Finally. Finally. After what feels like the longest and most contentious strip tease in automotive history, the Jaguar Type 01 has been revealed. Although I’ve been on my death bed with consumption or the vapors or some other equally glamorous ailment for the last couple of weeks, such is my dedication to you, the little people, that I managed to stay up until 1am last night, refreshing the Jaguar YouTube channel in anticipation of watching a glitzy, New York reveal.
And as my bedside clock ticked past the anointed hour, nothing happened. A quick Google revealed all the usual media outlets had posted their pre-prepared videos and stories, and as I was sick and grumpy, I looked at a few images and went to bed. Pouring over social media and the press images this morning, it all feels like a bit of an anticlimax. We already had a pretty good idea of what the new Jaguar was going to look like, because they had shown the Type 00 Concept over a year ago, and revealed the interior of the production version a few weeks back at Monterey Car Week. Whether this prolonged media strategy was planned or a result of the usual JLR asshattery doesn’t really matter. By the very nature of familiarity, the new Jaguar Type 01 exterior design cannot stun in the same way the concept did at Art Basel in Miami nearly two years ago.
I’m always saying that to truly understand a car you need to see it with your own eyes in the metal, and so it was when I finally saw the Type 00 Concept at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in 2025; I understood what Jaguar was trying to achieve. It was a car to make an impact. A wheeled cinder block chucked through the stained-glass window of automotive norms. The dreaded bold reimagining? Jaguar was burning the down the house and starting again in a completely different zip code. Amid all the brouhaha two years ago, I gathered my thoughts about why that was necessary here, but what is important to understand is Jaguar as a car company was fucked. In fact, they were turbo fucked with a capital F.

I highlighted in that piece that Jaguar’s problems went back decades. Although it was profitable in the mid-eighties, the company itself was a shambles with outdated working practices and ramshackle production facilities as a result of chronic under-investment by its founder, Sir William Lyons, and then latterly British Leyland. What I hadn’t realized at the time, but I have since learned because my current bedtime reading is a history of said British Leyland (it’s all rock and roll over here), is that Jaguar constantly blew it as early as the late sixties. Although labor disputes and gathering economic storms were beginning to affect the UK across all industries, Lyons’ ambivalence to his workforce and their unions, coupled with inconsistent government meddling, meant that although Jaguar had a world-beating product with the XJ, it could not be built fast enough or well enough. Waiting lists stretching to two years and cars rolling off the line with parts missing meant would-be XJ buyers soon got fed up and took their money to Mercedes with its outstanding new S-Class.

Basically, Ford massively overpaid for a pup and tried to recoup their losses by aiming for the Germans, a losing strategy that continued under Tata. If it wasn’t for the Land Rover side of the business keeping everything afloat, Jaguar would have been worm food years ago. Ian Callum has been doing the rehabilitation media rounds of late, lamenting what could have been, and talking about how much Jaguar spent on the suspension components of the XE in an attempt to ensure it drove better than a 3-series. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but customers can’t see suspension components. What they can see is interiors, which in the XE is where the money should have been spent. But all that is ancient history now, and we are where we are. So with regards to the Type 01, where exactly are we?
The truth is nobody knows. The EV market overall is softening, and OEMs who bet big on the transition like VAG are now neck-deep in shit. While there is undoubtedly a core market that is settling down for EVs in terms of everyday runabouts and crossovers for normal people, beyond that it’s chaos. Porsche, whose product mix strategy seems to be changing on a weekly basis, is watching Taycan sales fall off a cliff and has recently offloaded Rimac and Bugatti in an attempt to balance the ledger and re-focus the brand. Lucid, probably the closest analog to what Jaguar is trying in terms of price and volume, continues to flounder and undershoot sales estimates. Lotus and Rolls-Royce have seen their EV cars plod along steadily, but Ferrari has stated the controversial Luce has sold out through to 2027. So what’s going on in the high-end EV market? To quote the immortal Private Hudson: you tell me man, I only work here.

In the face of all that current uncertainty, Jaguar’s decision to go all in on a new luxury EV is a strange one. But it probably seemed like the right move five years ago when the Type 01 was signed off for production. I’ve heard that clay modelers were working under social distancing conditions when sculpting the production models. When JLR Design Development Director Andy Wheel (full disclosure, he was my line manager) is talking about maintaining Jaguar heritage, I don’t think he meant the decade-plus it took to get the XJ40 into showrooms. The EV version of the full-size Range Rover, which was designed while I still had a high security pass, was repeatedly kicked down the road and finally launched last week, about three years too late. It seems the ghost of British Leyland casts a long shadow over its children.

The Type 01 was signed off in about 2021, and then the concept was reverse-engineered from that. This is an extraordinarily long development program, even for a completely new platform. Which makes it all the more surprising to me how compromised some parts of the Type 01 appear to be. For a start, it’s a big old bus at 5200mm (205”) long with a whopping 3200mm (126”) wheelbase. For comparison, the Cadillac Celestiq is 5517mm (217”) long with a 3308mm (130”). I was under the impression Jaguar was going to use this length, and the consequent expansive dash-to-axle ratio, to package the cells in front of the firewall. This would allow them to have a low roofline with no reduction in interior space. What they’ve actually done is kept the cells in the floor, removed some from the rear passenger footwell, and placed one cell pack and the battery management modules ahead of the firewall. And still kept the super low roofline. As a result, the Type 01 looks very cramped inside, making it a very large 2+2 GT. Exacerbating this are the pint-sized doors, meaning ingress and egress are a more awkward experience than it should be for a luxury car. The door openings themselves have extremely large radii, probably as a result of all-aluminum body construction. The amount of interior trim peeking out behind the frameless glazing is particularly noticeable on the front doors, which don’t benefit from a privacy tint. If this is Jaguar’s stiffest bodyshell ever, as they are claiming, why not do away with the B pillar and make it a two-door like the Rolls Royce Spectre, and have a fancy front seat tipping mechanism for access to the occasional rears?

That low roofline means the rear header rail is behind the passenger’s noggins, making a rear windshield an impossibility, so Jaguar have done a Polestar and not bothered, utilizing a rear-view camera instead. But the screen for this is centrally mounted on the cowl in the middle of the soundbar at the base of the windshield, where it appears to be partly obscured by the drivers display. Given the mildly interesting interior architecture with the central spine, I was hoping this would be used in an innovative way, but it’s just a fancy cupholder and storage console. The Allegro homage squared-off steering wheel does have haptic controls on the spokes and stalks, but everything else is via the touchscreen in front of the driver or the smaller one standing proud on that central spine. Again, this feels like a decision taken six years ago before we started pushing back against such nonsense.

I don’t want to give the impression that I don’t like the Type 01, or that I think this relaunch is a mistake. Jaguar had to do something different. I was playing around on the website this morning and selected black on black as my colorway. I immediately pictured myself pulling up outside Berghain on a rain-slicked Berlin night looking as sinister as all fuck, and it all sort of clicked. Slightly disappointingly though, all the other launch colors are variations of gnome laundry water. Jaguar has already pissed off the ruddy-faced traditionalists, so why not continue to give them the middle finger by offering the car in that Miami Pink? Really lean into the villain bit, which, lest we forget, is also a part of the Jaguar heritage.

I think this means we are seeing the beginnings of high-end car design moving beyond established norms of balance and good taste, toward something more targeted at particular cohorts of buyers. Some brands do this already; Lamborghini knows their customers are bored TikTok socialites and builds cars for them – and they sell every single one. The Luce isn’t meant for regular Ferrari customers; it’s for television housewives who can now say their new Ferrari was designed by the guy who did the iPhone. The Cybertruck might be a childish fever dream, but for its intended audience of techbros, it was exactly what they wanted. And this is where I think the Type 01 lands. To a certain type of customer who funds nebulous tech startups for a living and views regular people as an inconvenience on the way to the great tech utopia, the Type 01 is a perfectly brutal statement of hostility. Those sheer surfaces and extreme proportions will provoke onlookers, and once ensconced inside, the stripped-to-the-bone yet reassuringly digital interior will feel comforting and familiar.

We live in an age of flattened culture. The algorithm dictates aesthetics and taste. Coffee shops are all exposed bricks and string lights. You will drink a small-batch IPA. New consumer products invariably end up with rounded corners and come in various shades of griege. Human interactions have been replaced by apps with soft fonts and purple-to-orange gradient backgrounds. The flip side to this unthreatening bouba-slop norm is that it opens up space on the outside for hyper-targeted products aimed at very specific audiences. The splashy hyper-neon corporatism of Bungie’s Marathon is one of the most distinctive and original art styles seen in a computer game for decades, and like the Jaguar, it attracted eye-rolling amounts of outrage. But the people who love the game (myself included) really, really love it. By making the Type 01 exterior hostile to external audiences and the interior welcoming to LinkedIn AI thought leaders, Jaguar is undoubtedly counting on the buying power of Silicon Valley HNWIs to achieve the same result.
All images and top graphic image: Jaguar









Can’t unsee this now, thanks. That just made the car that much more ugly to me.
Considering it has frameless doors it’s just shit. My 16 year old Mini Clubman does it better.
I still love the Clubman, I’m a sucker for the rear doors.
It’s hopefully still got another couple of years left in it. I honestly don’t know how I’d replace it.
Every time someone complains about an interesting car looking interesting, another greyscale midsize SUV gets its plastic cladding.
Beyond all the issues with this car, why choose to make most of the launch images and test cars silver?? The paint colors available are stunning, and brighter colors, particularly the red, make the 01 into something genuinely striking.
In gray/silver it looks cold and already dated.
Where have you seen red? It’s not on the UK website.
Its 5:10 into the Autotrader utube review:
“Jaguar Type 01: They let me drive it”.
https://youtu.be/2xwwGcS4Bjs?si=HoRvSPkqbOyk6HOS
Interesting. That trunk is fucking tiny.
Right! And why take the potential NVH hit to make it a hatchback if the area is small and the seats don’t fold down?
I think the seats do fold? But I’m not sure.
Kid Stuff Cadillac Sixteen.
How dare you accuse me of drinking that swill!
And, based on the discussions I’ve heard about Bungie in the wake of Destiny’s end, Marathon is also a pretty spectacular commercial failure. So a perfect analog to the Jaguar, I guess.
Maybe I’m a little-off on the Beer trends but the small-batch IPAs are the trend >15+ years ago with NEIPAs proliferating afterwards, and, now, it feels like Sours are the hotness that’s just cooling off. (milkshake stouts were in there somewhere)
What’s next year’s trend?
Can we turn back the clock to a simple bitter, or low abv stouts?
Thank god, Pilsners and Lagers are making a strong comeback at least in the PNW. Whole bunch of breweries are making easy drinkers for reasonable prices (10 Barrel Pub Beer being the flagship, along with Ninkasi Gold). I’m quite happy to see the overly hopped, overly sugared IPAs of yesteryear dying out.
I really hope a “basic Pilsner” option catches on but it’s genuinely a hard beer to do well as it shows all the brewing faults.
But when done well, it’s wonderful.
I actually don’t drink any beer at all. I hate the taste, and based on how I feel after I drink it I suspect I might have a mild allergy to hops or something. As such, I would never go near an IPA of any kind.
Weirdly I’m just the opposite, besides a Guiness, I only want an IPA. Then again, I’d rather a 12 year old scotch.
We are in complete agreement on that. 🙂
Given the trend has been toward not drinking at all, I suppose lightly flavored seltzers are the new hotness even though La Croix “Once Met A Lime At A Party” has been around for a while now.
There’s been so much vitriol and nonsense spouted online about the game it’s absolutely incredible. I’ve never seen a hate campaign like it.
But they’ve season 3 has just begun, and they’ve published a roadmap for the future for developments into next year.
So I don’t think it’s a commercial failure.
I don’t know, hating on Bethesda and Starfield is pretty darn fashionable, still. And bets are already getting placed on how much hate there will be for Elder Scrolls VI when it finally comes out. Apparently, hate-posting on a hotly anticipated game on YouTube and TikTok is a fast track through the algorithm to influencer stardom.
I liked Starfield but there just wasn’t enough to it in terms of side quests. It felt like a small campaign in a massive game world, and there was really no compelling reason to build ships/a base and become a pirate/cargo hauler whatever.
But now it’s on PS and they’ve added an expansion and other stuff, I will give it another go.
Interesting take. I’d not thought of it in that kind of Gibsonesque way, but it absolutely is Blue Ant era corporate villain car isn’t it?
Very much so.
This just feels more like a modern slab sided Lincoln than a Jaguar.
Is that a bad thing now that Lincoln doesn’t make any more cars?
I honestly don’t know. I see a line in this from the Kennedy era Lincolns through the early ’70s Continentals. Problem is – Jaguar was the polar opposite. Voluptuous curves and restrained size. Sinister in a different form.
I get why they did it. The brand was dead. I don’t know if this will save them, but it’s not like they had anything to lose.
Adrian as always nailing it. This car isn’t for everybody, and it’s not for me, but he’s hit exactly on why it will probably work, and who the market is. Whether any of us agree with it or not is irrelevant – this writing is exemplary. I would love to see Adrian get behind the wheel of one and be able to give driving impressions.
Autopian is lucky to have him.
His articles are always a treat to read.
Unfortunately I’m too much of a media outcast to get any kind of press access. Some journalists have driven prototypes and development cars, and got access to the production car ahead of time.
Not one single print publication, or online outlet with any kind of decent audience would publish a piece like this, apart from this place (even if cleaned it up a bit and fancied up the language, like I used to at Hagerty).
Long live The Autopian.
Hagerty sucks.
It’s like Hollywood wants to do a modern day remake of “The Great Gatsby,” and said to Jag – ‘make a present-day Duesenberg inspired by the styling cues of an Audi and the size of a ‘72 Fleetwood coupled with the interior space and outward visibility of one those discontinued Camaros.’
Found myself parked next to a ’74 or so Eldorado converitible yesterday. It was big and cheesy and I loved it!
Magnificent machines. I’ll take mine in black.
It was light blue metallic with white interior. Magnificent
Center console looks more like someone tried to stuff a surfboard in.
This being shallow, paranoid, misanthropy on wheels, it surely reflects the times and the anticipated customers. This is for people who have a lot of stuff, but still live petty, consumptive, control-seeking lives not worth living. They may be heavy into tech, but they are innately primitive. Smart—that’s a big market.
Design like all creative endeavours, reflects the society of the times.
It’s basically every dreadful automotive trend Tesla foisted upon us without our consent cranked up to 11 and, as uncle Adrian so eloquently put, wrapped up in the most hostile packaging possible for a small subset of nihilistic, dystopian, ultra wealthy techno feudalist overlords. In that way I guess I sort of see what they’re going for, but I don’t see why they’re going for it in 2026 because if the more civil ways of telling this class of cretin to fuck all the way off don’t work the less civil ones will have to come into play…and I don’t think rolling around in a brutalist aluminum codpiece is going to be a great idea when that happens.
I’m buying up shares in guillotine companies as we speak.
Short cake companies.
Yes to both call and response here. A tech-bro acquaintance is a step or two down the food chain from being the target market for this; at his level, he parrots talking points from Elon et al, breezily moves on to brazen new BS when the prior brazen BS burns in the dumpster, …and owns no car. But if he weren’t a digital nomad– and if you could buy the 01 with crypto– it might speak to him. Per Adrian’s point (edge?), I will not be surprised if this fellow’s response to the growing backlash will be an investment in ‘uploading his consciousness’ so that it can be sent to an orbiting data center– the EA/tech fever dream of galaxy-colonizing immortality thus obviating concern over what the mob would do to the overrated husk we clueless folk call his body.
I have had an idea for small, fold down guillotines mounted on either small boat or utility trailers, available for rent at all U-Haul locations. Cleaning fee is mandatory prepaid.
I think you may possibly be reading a bit too much into it. It’s just a car. People have various tastes. Someone with money may not want to be driving just another leased S class or 7 series, and find these proportions and overall impression of the car really striking.
How is it different than an Aston Lagonda or an LM002 or even a Countach. The difference is old cars are perceived charming, even though as a concept and aesthetic not that different from that Jag. I think it looks amazing, part of car design is pushing boundaries and bringing cars that look like concepts into production. There’s nothing that aggressive about it, the graphics are all very static and tidy. There’s no ostentatious lit up grille or weird slashes in random places.
It’s not any more brutalist and dystopian than a whole bunch of 70s and 80s cars that many people now love. The cybertruck is just a shit low budget movie prop, the Jag has some actual refined and automotive design into it.
Feels like people have gotten conditioned to shit proportions and they get taken aback when confronted with how a car is supposed to look like if exterior design took the place of utmost importance.
To me it seems as though they are deliberately trying to avoid any semblance of their heritage. People always seemed to want (of Jag wanted to deliver) a “new E-Type” and they made Jags that looked like older Jags exclusively for a very long time. Then they made some nice but “this could be any brand” sedans.
This is bold. It is distinctive. It says “we’re not relying on past glories.” All of those for good or bad.
And — dammit — I am starting to get used to the design.
I’m of two minds on the design. The proportions are wild and from some angles (that rear 3/4, especially) I really like it. But then you realize that because of that design there’s no rear window. And the passenger compartment is tiny and difficult to access. And it would be impossible to see out of and probably a nightmare to park. There’s a reason why production cars usually don’t look exactly like the concepts that spawn them and this car is a rolling demonstration of why this is the case.
Again, it’s all for good or bad.
I am looking at it purely esthetically. Any car with no rear window is clearly not based around practicality.
“a certain type of customer who funds nebulous tech startups for a living and views regular people as an inconvenience on the way to the great tech utopia”.
It might have been quicker to just say ‘wankers’.
Yes but I have to pad out the word count.
Unless the MSRP has three figures this thing ain’t for me.
I’m not sure how much you’d have to pay me to drive one of these, but it’s greater than 3 figures.
Would you charge less if you could wear a bag over your head?
Now I’m thinking I might do it if they gave it to me in black and included a full Darth Vader costume. At least it would be fun around Halloween. 🙂
So basically it’s a car for the nouveau riche AI bros who think spending too much money on something is the same thing as having taste.
So we’ve got this, the Audi Concept C, and the Bentley EXP 15, that all look like a similar block (to me at least). Guess this means Jaguar isn’t a one off, and this is more of a trend?
That Bentley concept has been quietly shuffled to the back of a forgotten warehouse at Crewe.
We asked the Bentley people at FoS why it wasn’t there and got a load of mealy mouthed nonsense about a change of plans.
They didn’t want to show it because it had already gotten a negative reaction.
The Type 01 and Concept C were both designed by Massimo Frascella, so not sure if it’s a trend or just one designers vision.
Not quite Berlin in black, but similar sentiment.
When I saw it I though rap video. Many options, the black, bright color, even in a brown and white spat shoe style. Brutalist statement piece 1000%.
This is something I noticed when watching CarWow’s video, especially inside. It’s like it’s all padding. You know when you’re designing a website and everything feels like thick and far apart? This car is that. The trunk is surprisingly shallow and narrow, there’s like a foot of carpet on the sides. The headliner is the same way, the window trim on each door and Matt Watson even mentioned that the windows are not even made of acoustic glass.
Like you said, the car feels extremely cramped inside, with a belt line that’s way worse than a Camaro, no rear window and all that padding it gave me claustrophobia and I’m not claustrophobic.
I hate the exterior but I thought there would be something interesting about the interior, but I’ve seen new Chinese cars with better executed interiors and way more efficient use of space.
That’s the disappointing part. I really hoped the interior was hiding something interesting but no, not really. It feels incredibly compromised for no good reason.
The interior reminds me of the interiors of the cars in the film “Equilibrium”. It seems to fit the exterior of the car, thematically.
That last sentence also describes the exterior, no?
At least the Cadillac Sixteen had an interior to back up the exterior styling. This new Jag goes from an outside that shouts brutal machine power to an interior that’s just… Empty. Anticlimactic.
It’s like a totally ripped dude with a premature ejaculation problem.
But like I said elsewhere, it’s for techbros who are compensating for something. Just like the Cybertruck.
Oh, now I see it: 4 headlights and a big square snout is the 1968 XJ!
And the exaturrated distance between bulkhead and front axle, with “things” is the 1961 E-type. I had that already.
I would also have put vertical batteries in the centre console, to kind of use it for something other than just a gimmick. The EV1, of all cars, actually did that.
But I still hate the camera pod on the roof! Just looks so cheap, compared to the rest. They could have hidden them behind a rear window. Fukc it if you can’t see out of it, it would just have looked better!
Sure looks quite evil, with the big wheels and the small windows, like the Chrysler 300 before it. Only even more.
Thanks for your article! They are always so well written.
It’s just Borderlands without cell shading to me, but sure, call it original.
Oh please, really? Have you seen the Art Station concept art dumps?
I have not, actually. I only saw screen grabs from in-game and a couple trailers before saying “I’ll stick to the original from the ’90s”. So maybe I’m not giving it a fair shake.
Go watch the launch cinematic on YouTube.
I love it. It reminds me of 72’ Imperial. If they could have just done something other than slap some screens in the interior it would have looked so much better. This has to be black on black it’s the only way it is making sense to me. Unfortunately I can’t afford the depreciation on it new but I would definitely buy one if its value wasn’t going to fall off a cliff as soon as I bought it. Maybe if the leases are decent.
I can’t imagine buyers in this price bracket are leasing.
In the US, a huge percentage of the sales will be leases. It’s the same way for all cars in that price bracket – largely due to tax advantages. In addition to the taxes, especially with this car, most buyers don’t want to take the chance of dealing with them after the first 2-3 years. To compare, a lot of Range Rovers, S-Classes, etc are leased. You can always find lease deals on them.
I have to say I really like the villainous look of this car. And the Cadillac Celestiq and the Imperial. It has presence.
I actually think this works a lot better than the Celestiq.
Its architectural brutalism in automotive dress. I dislike brutalism for buildings and I hate it in this automotive form.
I love Brutalism. It soothes me.
What would be the musical equivalent of Brutalism, in your opinion?
I think Perturbator’s “In the Void” could be representative.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k6hUmLYLO0
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmo7nEPoCak&list=RDTmo7nEPoCak&start_radio=1
Banger.
That whole playlist is. Especially Years of Denial.
congrats on likely being a statistical outlier.
Gaguar.
COTD, and I’m disappointed in myself for not coming up with that.