Home » If You’re The Kind Of Person The Jaguar Type 01 Is Designed For, You Better Buy It

If You’re The Kind Of Person The Jaguar Type 01 Is Designed For, You Better Buy It

Jaguar 01 Adrian Ts

Finally. Finally. After what feels like the longest and most contentious strip tease in automotive history, the Jaguar Type 01 has been revealed. Although I’ve been on my death bed with consumption or the vapors or some other equally glamorous ailment for the last couple of weeks, such is my dedication to you, the little people, that I managed to stay up until 1am last night, refreshing the Jaguar YouTube channel in anticipation of watching a glitzy, New York reveal.

And as my bedside clock ticked past the anointed hour, nothing happened. A quick Google revealed all the usual media outlets had posted their pre-prepared videos and stories, and as I was sick and grumpy, I looked at a few images and went to bed. Pouring over social media and the press images this morning, it all feels like a bit of an anticlimax. We already had a pretty good idea of what the new Jaguar was going to look like, because they had shown the Type 00 Concept over a year ago, and revealed the interior of the production version a few weeks back at Monterey Car Week. Whether this prolonged media strategy was planned or a result of the usual JLR asshattery doesn’t really matter. By the very nature of familiarity, the new Jaguar Type 01 exterior design cannot stun in the same way the concept did at Art Basel in Miami nearly two years ago.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I’m always saying that to truly understand a car you need to see it with your own eyes in the metal, and so it was when I finally saw the Type 00 Concept at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in 2025; I understood what Jaguar was trying to achieve. It was a car to make an impact. A wheeled cinder block chucked through the stained-glass window of automotive norms. The dreaded bold reimagining? Jaguar was burning the down the house and starting again in a completely different zip code. Amid all the brouhaha two years ago, I gathered my thoughts about why that was necessary here, but what is important to understand is Jaguar as a car company was fucked. In fact, they were turbo fucked with a capital F.

Jagsplosion2 Top

I highlighted in that piece that Jaguar’s problems went back decades. Although it was profitable in the mid-eighties, the company itself was a shambles with outdated working practices and ramshackle production facilities as a result of chronic under-investment by its founder, Sir William Lyons, and then latterly British Leyland. What I hadn’t realized at the time, but I have since learned because my current bedtime reading is a history of said British Leyland (it’s all rock and roll over here), is that Jaguar constantly blew it as early as the late sixties. Although labor disputes and gathering economic storms were beginning to affect the UK across all industries, Lyons’ ambivalence to his workforce and their unions, coupled with inconsistent government meddling, meant that although Jaguar had a world-beating product with the XJ, it could not be built fast enough or well enough. Waiting lists stretching to two years and cars rolling off the line with parts missing meant would-be XJ buyers soon got fed up and took their money to Mercedes with its outstanding new S-Class.

Screenshot 2026 10 08 At 9.16.44 am

Basically, Ford massively overpaid for a pup and tried to recoup their losses by aiming for the Germans, a losing strategy that continued under Tata. If it wasn’t for the Land Rover side of the business keeping everything afloat, Jaguar would have been worm food years ago. Ian Callum has been doing the rehabilitation media rounds of late, lamenting what could have been, and talking about how much Jaguar spent on the suspension components of the XE in an attempt to ensure it drove better than a 3-series. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but customers can’t see suspension components. What they can see is interiors, which in the XE is where the money should have been spent. But all that is ancient history now, and we are where we are. So with regards to the Type 01, where exactly are we?

The truth is nobody knows. The EV market overall is softening, and OEMs who bet big on the transition like VAG are now neck-deep in shit. While there is undoubtedly a core market that is settling down for EVs in terms of everyday runabouts and crossovers for normal people, beyond that it’s chaos. Porsche, whose product mix strategy seems to be changing on a weekly basis, is watching Taycan sales fall off a cliff and has recently offloaded Rimac and Bugatti in an attempt to balance the ledger and re-focus the brand. Lucid, probably the closest analog to what Jaguar is trying in terms of price and volume, continues to flounder and undershoot sales estimates. Lotus and Rolls-Royce have seen their EV cars plod along steadily, but Ferrari has stated the controversial Luce has sold out through to 2027. So what’s going on in the high-end EV market? To quote the immortal Private Hudson: you tell me man, I only work here.

Design Front 34

In the face of all that current uncertainty, Jaguar’s decision to go all in on a new luxury EV is a strange one. But it probably seemed like the right move five years ago when the Type 01 was signed off for production. I’ve heard that clay modelers were working under social distancing conditions when sculpting the production models. When JLR Design Development Director Andy Wheel (full disclosure, he was my line manager) is talking about maintaining Jaguar heritage, I don’t think he meant the decade-plus it took to get the XJ40 into showrooms. The EV version of the full-size Range Rover, which was designed while I still had a high security pass, was repeatedly kicked down the road and finally launched last week, about three years too late. It seems the ghost of British Leyland casts a long shadow over its children.

Design Rear 34

The Type 01 was signed off in about 2021, and then the concept was reverse-engineered from that. This is an extraordinarily long development program, even for a completely new platform. Which makes it all the more surprising to me how compromised some parts of the Type 01 appear to be. For a start, it’s a big old bus at 5200mm (205”) long with a whopping 3200mm (126”) wheelbase. For comparison, the Cadillac Celestiq is 5517mm (217”) long with a 3308mm (130”). I was under the impression Jaguar was going to use this length, and the consequent expansive dash-to-axle ratio, to package the cells in front of the firewall. This would allow them to have a low roofline with no reduction in interior space. What they’ve actually done is kept the cells in the floor, removed some from the rear passenger footwell, and placed one cell pack and the battery management modules ahead of the firewall. And still kept the super low roofline. As a result, the Type 01 looks very cramped inside, making it a very large 2+2 GT. Exacerbating this are the pint-sized doors, meaning ingress and egress are a more awkward experience than it should be for a luxury car. The door openings themselves have extremely large radii, probably as a result of all-aluminum body construction. The amount of interior trim peeking out behind the frameless glazing is particularly noticeable on the front doors, which don’t benefit from a privacy tint. If this is Jaguar’s stiffest bodyshell ever, as they are claiming, why not do away with the B pillar and make it a two-door like the Rolls Royce Spectre, and have a fancy front seat tipping mechanism for access to the occasional rears?

Type01 Tub

That low roofline means the rear header rail is behind the passenger’s noggins, making a rear windshield an impossibility, so Jaguar have done a Polestar and not bothered, utilizing a rear-view camera instead. But the screen for this is centrally mounted on the cowl in the middle of the soundbar at the base of the windshield, where it appears to be partly obscured by the drivers display. Given the mildly interesting interior architecture with the central spine, I was hoping this would be used in an innovative way, but it’s just a fancy cupholder and storage console. The Allegro homage squared-off steering wheel does have haptic controls on the spokes and stalks, but everything else is via the touchscreen in front of the driver or the smaller one standing proud on that central spine. Again, this feels like a decision taken six years ago before we started pushing back against such nonsense.

Passenger Row1 Detail 0

I don’t want to give the impression that I don’t like the Type 01, or that I think this relaunch is a mistake. Jaguar had to do something different. I was playing around on the website this morning and selected black on black as my colorway. I immediately pictured myself pulling up outside Berghain on a rain-slicked Berlin night looking as sinister as all fuck, and it all sort of clicked. Slightly disappointingly though, all the other launch colors are variations of gnome laundry water. Jaguar has already pissed off the ruddy-faced traditionalists, so why not continue to give them the middle finger by offering the car in that Miami Pink? Really lean into the villain bit, which, lest we forget, is also a part of the Jaguar heritage.

Silver Front 7 8

I think this means we are seeing the beginnings of high-end car design moving beyond established norms of balance and good taste, toward something more targeted at particular cohorts of buyers. Some brands do this already; Lamborghini knows their customers are bored TikTok socialites and builds cars for them – and they sell every single one. The Luce isn’t meant for regular Ferrari customers; it’s for television housewives who can now say their new Ferrari was designed by the guy who did the iPhone. The Cybertruck might be a childish fever dream, but for its intended audience of techbros, it was exactly what they wanted. And this is where I think the Type 01 lands. To a certain type of customer who funds nebulous tech startups for a living and views regular people as an inconvenience on the way to the great tech utopia, the Type 01 is a perfectly brutal statement of hostility. Those sheer surfaces and extreme proportions will provoke onlookers, and once ensconced inside, the stripped-to-the-bone yet reassuringly digital interior will feel comforting and familiar.

Centre Screen Detail 0

We live in an age of flattened culture. The algorithm dictates aesthetics and taste. Coffee shops are all exposed bricks and string lights. You will drink a small-batch IPA. New consumer products invariably end up with rounded corners and come in various shades of griege. Human interactions have been replaced by apps with soft fonts and purple-to-orange gradient backgrounds. The flip side to this unthreatening bouba-slop norm is that it opens up space on the outside for hyper-targeted products aimed at very specific audiences. The splashy hyper-neon corporatism of Bungie’s Marathon is one of the most distinctive and original art styles seen in a computer game for decades, and like the Jaguar, it attracted eye-rolling amounts of outrage. But the people who love the game (myself included) really, really love it. By making the Type 01 exterior hostile to external audiences and the interior welcoming to LinkedIn AI thought leaders, Jaguar is undoubtedly counting on the buying power of Silicon Valley HNWIs to achieve the same result.

All images and top graphic image: Jaguar

 

 

Follow us on:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
189 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John B Patson
John B Patson
1 hour ago

At least with those wheels it could be used as a tractor, just need Ag tyres on them.
Low roof means ideal for orchard work.
That is what they meant with all the guff about a green future.
See in the UK there is great amusement because it does not fit in standard parking places.
Means it is no good for bank robber getaways…

George A Mueller
George A Mueller
2 hours ago

It’s Poring over social media…. NOT POURING

Richard Truett
Member
Richard Truett
2 hours ago

“This is an extraordinarily long development program, even for a completely new platform.”
But…
It’s more than just a new platform.
It’s a new electrical system, new powertrain new suspension, new batteries, new manufacturing plant, etc. It’s all new from the wheels up, no carryover parts.
And this is Jaguar.
So, if it took longer to ensure quality — and there is NO room for error here — I am OK with that.
Having seen the production-intent car at Gaydon some weeks ago, I can tell you Adrian nails it on the interior and ingress and egress issues. That low roof has even normal size people twisting and contorting to get in and out. There is not much room in the rear seats.
It’s important to note that Jaguar isn’t counting on the Type 01 to be a money spinner. That’s the job of the next one. The Type 01 is to relaunch the brand’s new look and mission and be very exclusive. That’s it.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
6 hours ago

Sir William is whirling in his grave faster than the engine of a D-type at the end of the Mulsanne straight.

I hope I NEVER see one of these in person. It is an afront to my very nature.

Jaguar should have been allowed to gracefully die eons ago.

Sofonda Wagons
Member
Sofonda Wagons
8 hours ago

Transfer the funds into my account and it is a done deal! I want that steel blue color, BTW.

Last edited 8 hours ago by Sofonda Wagons
Preston Shelton
Member
Preston Shelton
10 hours ago

I did not like the concept when it came out, but seeing the production version, especially as the concept debuted long enough ago to allow the design to “simmer”, I think it’s what Jag needed. It’s a villainous design that screams cyberpunk elitist. I mean this in the best way possible, it exudes a sinister presence that most jags have had. If the Kray twins were alive in this era, I could easily see them pulling up in one. Jaguar has always been an emotional vs logical choice in comparison to the Germans, and the Type 01 fits this. It’s not the logical choice, but it’s exactly what I would choose to drive if I wanted to be noticed arriving somewhere. It’s what I would drive on my way to a hostile takeover meeting. I could see Cruella Deville or Miranda Priestly in one of these.

It’s not a pretty vehicle but traditional standards, but I can’t help but appreciate its design. My biggest qualm is the fact that I, a 6’8” individual, will definitely not have enough headroom in it.

ADDvanced
ADDvanced
11 hours ago

Speaking of Daniel Simon the other day, the concept and this sedan both remind me of his concepts, in terms of proportions. That’s what so many ‘new’ cars have, utter shit proportions! The amount of sheet metal above the rear wheel on so many Lexus sedans is extremely huge and it makes the rear wheels look small, so the current trend in hte industry is to just put a bunch of creases and bends and tortured surfacing all over the place to HIDE those shit proportions.

Meanwhile, this Jag concept is making me think of Simon’s work like this:

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/4f3b23bed09a935e9c63a41b/1362451684215-PR25NI3X60DFCMEEWK7X/CosmicMotors_Galaxion_04.jpg

HUGE wheels, impossibly long, impossibly low, just total GANGSTER proportions.

I love this design and I hope it works well for them. The front and rear ends still need tweaking imho but the side profile is just menacing.

LBJsPNS
Member
LBJsPNS
15 hours ago

RIP Jaguar.

986istheanswer
Member
986istheanswer
17 hours ago

I think Jaguar told Elon Musk to hold their beer and watch this.

Lost on the Nürburgring
Lost on the Nürburgring
18 hours ago

I interpreted the parenthetical for the headline “If You’re The Kind Of Person The Jaguar Type 01 Is Designed For, You Better Buy It” to be “because Jaguar is a dead man walking and they just pushed all their chips in on this cinderblock of a car that no one will buy…”

Methinks ”jaGuar” is toast.

Last edited 18 hours ago by Lost on the Nürburgring
Ppnw
Member
Ppnw
19 hours ago

I can’t wait to buy one of these in 8 years for $15k and roll around Los Angeles in it.

Beached Wail
Member
Beached Wail
20 hours ago

The product brief for the Type 01 must have been “a sarcophagus for influencers narcissists who hate to drive.” The entire point will be to soothe those who crave constant attention and validation.

As far as any pretense at utility, who cares? Visibility, passenger space, cargo capacity? Pfffft! The point isn’t to drive it, it’s to be seen driving it.

No buyer will keep one beyond the warranty period (5 years or 500 Insta posts), at which point they’ll migrate to a FSD Tesla or whatever’s out there requiring zero driver interaction. Wonder what service will be like a decade from now for the 4th owner who picks one up at the local Buy Here Pay Here lot?

Jd Jd
Jd Jd
20 hours ago

Honestly if it was an Audi and a convertible I’d probably love it.

Noahwayout
Member
Noahwayout
20 hours ago

EVs were supposed to save us from the worst effects of global warming. Instead they’ve come to represent the excesses of society, driving us ever closer to the brink, one 6,000lb fever dream at a times

Space
Space
13 hours ago
Reply to  Noahwayout

I feel like it was originally way for people to pretend they were doing something to help, all the while not making changes that actually mattered.

986istheanswer
Member
986istheanswer
13 hours ago
Reply to  Space

100% political posturing and virtue signaling at its finest.

D4-D
D4-D
12 hours ago
Reply to  Noahwayout

There have always been excessive cars. Expecting of luxury car makers to save the world is a bit naive. If you wanna save the world take the bus. Arguably though it’s better as an EV than something with a V8.

Zykotec
Zykotec
21 hours ago

Like most of us, I don’t really think my opinion on the design is all that important, as I’m not rich enough and don’t hate buttons and manual door handles enough to consider buying it new.
But I do like the looks of it. Even more than I thought I would, even if there are some details I dislike or don’t quite understand.
I can agree that it looks like a Jaguar, and it looks absolutely evil. The stance and proportions seem uncompromised in a way other production cars never really do.

And compared to the Polestar 5 that is finally showing up on actual roads the Jag can be had in a whole plethora of actual colours.

If only the grille had a big cat instead of just the minimalist label . And if the top rib of the grille wasn’t above the line, And if the number of ribs on the front grille matched the rear grille. And why are the charging ports so much more rounded than everything else? And why did they still make the impossible quarter panels when they knew they were impossible ? (I guess that was aerodynamics, but still)

I prefer the coupe ‘concept’ tbh. Especially the rear end with its narrower grill. But I haven’t seen any of them in real life, and wouldn’t(couldn’t?) buy any of them anyway.

Slow Joe Crow
Slow Joe Crow
21 hours ago

Thanks for putting this in perspective as the automotive equivalent to a Vertu cell phone. I suppose it could also be likened to an upscale Cybertruck, similar blocky F off proles exterior and the same minimalist tech bro interior. For the Silicon Valley types who cashed in their IPO options.
I wouldn’t bother with this even if I had millions since the only Indian vehicles that interest me are from Royal Enfield

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
1 hour ago
Reply to  Slow Joe Crow

A Cybertruck for people for whom the Cybertruck is too inexpensive and too abundant.

Tbird
Member
Tbird
21 hours ago

It looks like the Batmobile from the 1990 animated series. Not a bad thing in and of itself, problem is Jaguar. It should look like it would be driven by Catwoman, not The Thing.

It would not raise an eyebrow were it a Rolls, Bentley, or Lincoln.

Last edited 21 hours ago by Tbird
Zykotec
Zykotec
21 hours ago
Reply to  Tbird

It really does.

UnseenCat
UnseenCat
15 hours ago
Reply to  Zykotec

I’m trying to remember if the 90’s animated Batman series ever showed the Batmobile’s interior or dashboard. If it did, it was probably some retro-futuristic mashup of screens plus physical controls. Unfortunately, Jaguar missed the memo on that bit.

Guillaume Maurice
Guillaume Maurice
21 hours ago

Well, “It’s a Jaaaaaaag!”

(sadly Jaguar does not make tractors… otherwise I think we would have seen a Jaaaaaaaaag tractor in a well known UK farm)

Pinto Panopticon
Member
Pinto Panopticon
21 hours ago

If America’s wealth was a pie, the top 20% would have 9 out of 10 pieces. That’s why this car makes sense. This car is for rich ass holes who go to the Land Rover dealership and will see that they don’t have to get an S-Class for their other car–they can get this.

As someone who has sold thousands and thousands of luxury cars, I can vouch that people buy based on pricing points, even when wealthy. This car doesn’t have a lot of competitors in the $130,000 range, and especially that ooze style like this thing does.

An S-Class is pretty blasé, if we’re honest with ourselves. It looks like a big fat C-Class, which is kind of what it is.

Additionally, a large contingent of large sedan buyers haven’t been tempted to change brands because cars in that class rarely change and are always an evolution.

Lastly, the ONLY non-German big sedan left was the LS 500 and it was replaced by the ES 500e all-electric, which isn’t going that well for it.

Evo_CS
Evo_CS
22 hours ago

I remember your excellent write up of the initial concept, especially the information about the design proclivities of Gerry McGovern and his attachment to modernism. This car seems to be stepping into the realm of brutalism. More artfully so than the Cyber Truck, as there is some compelling sculpture on parts of the Type 01. I wish there were even more contrast between inside and out. I could envision some even softer forms (not bulbous mind you) and more warmth inside as a counterpoint to the monolith.

Slow Joe Crow
Slow Joe Crow
12 hours ago
Reply to  Evo_CS

I think you’re doing Brutalism a disservice. Good Brutalist architecture can be surprisingly warm, and uses the texture of the wood concrete forms for a natural effect. The false cognate of brutal and brut and the prevalence of bad Brutalist buildings in authoritarian regimes gives it a bad reputation. The,Jaguar type 01 and the Cybertruck represent a sort of tech bro esthetic that favors aggressive in your face styling, like a brodozer with an artistic manifesto.

Evo_CS
Evo_CS
2 minutes ago
Reply to  Slow Joe Crow

That’s why I slowed my roll into calling it full on “brutalist”. The type of person described by Adrian seemed to be wanting something akin to the authoritarian style of brutalist, which, to me, is the imperious, massive hulking aesthetic that this car resembles.

Protodite
Protodite
22 hours ago

A great write up for a questionable vehicle. I think the side profile is much better than the concept car, but the front continues to just be so lacking. I do think the most shocking part is the interior. I am not sure how inserting a credit card reader POS system in your center console reads as luxurious at all, but it doesn’t seem like I’m the intended audience either. I’d argue it looks like a reflection of the furniture design industry, and the gallery model that’s gripped furniture for the past few years – it’s increasingly worse products meant solely to signal versus actual use, which is why Design Miami was such an apt place to show it off first.

However, being in that space I’m seeing the backlash from designers, and hearing more and more how it’s all smoke and (really expensive) mirrors. There may be some clientele, but not enough to sustain the industry it pretends to be, and I could also see that coming for Jaguar with this. Yes, it’s splashy and will play well with attention and press, but best of luck getting that to translate into the sales that it needs to exist…

At the same time I can applaud trying something different! It’s really fun to see cars that absolutely swing for the fences, but you’d like to see they get a few more things right on the way there.

Argentine Utop
Member
Argentine Utop
22 hours ago

I come from the future.
Madonna will buy the 3rd unit sent to the US, because it’s not a Tesla, and then a cadre of woke celebrities will follow.
Sillicon Valley villains will reject the association, and the car altogether, and just renew their Teslas.
Normal people will keep buying Audis and Mercedes.

Argentine Utop
Member
Argentine Utop
22 hours ago

I’m not a football player, pop musician or russian oligarch, hence this is not a car for me. (also, I’m poor as fuck, I guess that, too).

Great piece, Adrian, thanks!

LMCorvairFan
Member
LMCorvairFan
23 hours ago

I think it looks a little like a cross between a Cadillac Sixteen and an Jag XF. Watched a couple of YT vids on it yesterday. Claustrophobic interior and zero storage space was a bit of a surprise given the size if the thing. Given the target audience and likely use, that shouldn’t matter. It’s a statement bauble.

LMCorvairFan
Member
LMCorvairFan
23 hours ago

Great read as always Adrian.

189
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x