Roughly three million semi-tractors make up a significant portion of America’s logistics backbone. When you’re working, sleeping, or playing, truckers from sea to shining sea are driving to keep America moving. If you’ve ever found enough time to spare at one of these rigs in traffic, you’ve probably noticed some interesting modification choices. Many trucks are rolling around America with big chrome-plated spikes poking out of their wheels. Why do these exist? What would happen if your car contacted these spikes? Something like this? The answer is thankfully better than you’d probably expect.
The subject of trucks with spikes came up in a recent Autopian staff meeting, and I was somewhat surprised to learn that my car enthusiast colleagues didn’t know why trucks are running around with spikes, and my colleagues write about cars for a living. I can only imagine how many other drivers have wondered about this, too.
There are some myths and legends about truck spikes out there. If you take what you see on the internet at face value, you might think that these spikes would absolutely screw up any car they came into contact with. The good news is that these spikes don’t turn semis into death rigs, but they also are a little bit less useful than is sometimes claimed.

Nut Caps Have Been Around Forever
The spikes that you see hanging off truck wheels are not weird, super-long lug nuts. Instead, they’re just a variation of an old idea, the lug nut cover.
The earliest mention of a nut cover that I could find in patent literature was a 1902 design by inventor Frank Lambert. He notes that the exposure of nuts, bolts, and studs is a big deal because these parts can corrode. Lambert said that there was an existing solution to this problem in a single-piece “cap-nut,” also known today as an acorn nut, that mated a protective cover to a nut.

Lambert’s idea was to separate the cap from the nut for ease of manufacture and cost savings. From the patent:
When exposed to the atmosphere or water, bolts with cap-nuts are preferable to open nuts, as corrosion along the thread between the bolt and the nut is prevented. Open nuts are easily manufactured; but cap-nuts in one piece are more expensive, as they require more costly operations, and much material is wasted in their manufacture. Where bolt nuts are used in places exposed to the atmosphere or water, the effect is that the ‘few threads of the bolt that may project out beyond the nut soon become corroded, which renders the removal of the nut very difficult, if not impossible. Cap-nuts are more ornamental and permit of the machine being kept clean more easily. When open nuts are used and some of the threads of the bolt project out beyond the nut, these threads catch the dust and oil, which is difficultly removed. Another advantage of the use of cap-nuts is that the length of the bolt does not need to be so closely calculated-that is, to make the bolt end come flush with the nut since when a cap-nut is screwed down it hides the end of the bolt, and it does not make any difference whether the bolt is a couple of threads longer or shorter.
By my present invention I take a common open nut, form a groove in its top surrounding the opening, and insert in the groove an independent cap, thereby producing an efficient cap-nut at a low cost. While nuts are generally made of metal such as brass, steel, or iron-according to my invention the caps can be of different material than the nut, according to the use to which the nut is to be applied. For cheapness an iron cap can be used, and for fancy nuts, where appearance is a matter of concern, a cap (or covering for the cap) of brass, celluloid, hard rubber, or other material can be used equally as well.
This patent would suggest that the acorn nut has been around since the early 1900s at the very least. Sadly, I could not locate who invented them, though I did find a patent from 1852 that described a decorative cap that would go on top of wood screws. Really, it looks to me like people have been trying to cover up fasteners for at least two centuries, either for decorative or anti-corrosive reasons.

Now, in theory, Lambert’s invention could have been used on an early car. The earliest mention that I could find for lug nut caps is a patent application filed in 1962 and granted in 1964. That cap, which was invented by Leonard H Johnston Jr. and Vernor W. Strom, was designed to keep dirt and the outside environment away from nuts and threads, therefore keeping them free from corrosion.
Patent records show countless more lug nut cap variations after 1964. It would seem to me that if you have a car or truck that has caps covering its lug nuts or lug bolts, its lineage probably traces back to these early inventions. Sadly, I haven’t been able to ascertain when truckers started slapping them onto their lug nuts.
Very ‘Heavy Metal’ But Not Actually Heavy Metal

From what I’ve been able to find, it seems that wheel spikes became a large enough trend for people to start noticing back in the 2010s. As one might expect, many drivers were and are at a minimum curious and often downright concerned about what appear to be solid steel spikes doubling as lug nuts on semis. They also wondered, again, pretty reasonably, about what would happen if their cars made contact with those spikes.
Of course, the spikes are not solid, but merely covers for the actual lug nuts, and effectively no different than any other nut or bolt cover. They’re there for aesthetics and to keep gunk off the wheel’s fasteners. Some news publications and law firms have claimed that the spikes are also there for visibility. The idea is that, if you somehow did not see the semi-truck and its trailer as you drove next to it, maybe you’d see the spinning spikes and know to keep away.

According to WFLA News, some trucking companies banned the use of wheel spikes for the opposite reason, saying that spikes are actually distracting to drivers, not a real safety benefit. So there’s a debate about how effective the spikes even are.
I haven’t found any solid research one way or another about the efficacy of spikes in getting drivers’ attention, but I do find the safety angle at least a little suspect. I would think that if a driver misses an entire 80,000-pound 18-wheeler, they probably won’t see the spikes until it’s too late, anyway. It’s not like trucks just sneak up on you.

There have also been claims that these spikes have caused heavy damage to vehicles. You can see one of those vehicles in the WFLA News video (click the image, or here, for the video). You can also see claims and photos of purported wheel spike damage on Reddit and forums.
These spikes are generally made out of plastic, flexible rubber, or aluminum that’s barely thicker than a soda can, and then are painted to look like actual chrome. These spikes are held on entirely by friction. It’s unlikely that these spikes will gouge up a car as you see in some photos online. Instead, what’s more likely is that the spikes fall off and your car gets mauled by the wheel’s actual lug nuts and studs, which are a much harder metal. There’s a popular Reddit thread where a mechanic claims that a car was destroyed by wheel spikes, but in the comments, the vehicle’s actual owner chimed in to say that spikes weren’t even involved.

Granted, I’m sure there are exceptions to this, and I would be unsurprised to learn that someone has made these spikes out of heavy metal. But if your car finds itself interfacing with the wheel of a semi, it seems your greater concern will be the truck’s actual lug nuts and, well, the truck itself.
Are Spikes Legal?

Sadly, those spikes, even the plastic ones, do pose a real danger to bicyclists, motorcyclists, and pedestrians. According to the National Law Review, nearly half of the cyclists and about a quarter of the pedestrians killed by trucks are struck by the side of the truck first. In theory, this means if the truck has spikes, there’s a chance the person can get caught up in them.
The legality of these spikes varies. The state of Hawai’i bans spikes that stick out further than four inches. The state of Washington banned them more fully, stating in its statutes:
“No vehicle shall be equipped with wheel nuts, hub caps or wheel discs extending outside the body of the vehicle when viewed from directly above which: (a) incorporate winged projections; or (b) constitute a hazard to pedestrians and cyclists.”

Florida appears to allow spikes so long as they don’t make the vehicle’s overall width greater than 102 inches. Texas also appears to have a width-based restriction. Gadgets that protrude from wheels without being covered by a fender or other guard are illegal in Australia, and truckers have been fined for running them, Sgt. Jesse Grabow of the Minnesota State Patrol wrote in 2022 that Minnesota, like many states, doesn’t regulate these spikes, and neither does the federal government. However, several trucking companies do ban them.
Earlier, I called these spikes a little bit less useful than is sometimes claimed. There are wheel nut covers that you can buy that are nearly flush with the nut, or are rounded out and do not stick inches out. So, if a trucker is buying the spikes just for the protection angle, there are better options. Alcoa, a prominent aluminum wheel maker, also makes smaller nut covers! I also wonder about the effectiveness of these spikes if moisture does make it in.

But they do make a statement about style. It seems people either adore semi-truck spikes or hate them, not really any different than the feelings about wheel spikes on pickup trucks or the wild swangas wheels on big American sedans. The effects of these types of modifications on collisions involving pedestrians and cyclists are concerning, for sure. So, I see why trucking companies and some jurisdictions want to rein them in.
But now know why the truck you recently saw was sporting spikes. If you take anything away from this story, it’s that the plastic, rubber, or thin aluminum spikes on most of these trucks are unlikely to seriously screw up your car. But if you’re a motorcyclist, bicyclist, or pedestrian, keep your head on a swivel and watch out for drivers who might not be looking out for you. If you’re behind the wheel of any vehicle, look for and be friendly to cyclists and pedestrians! Everyone can benefit from safer travel.
Topshot graphic image: Raney’s Truck Parts









“The idea is that, if you somehow did not see the semi-truck and its trailer as you drove next to it, maybe you’d see the spinning spikes and know to keep away.”
Ha. Its a stupid intimidating thing. If they arent solid, maybe i’ll swing a hammer at a parked truck to find out. Maybe not.
Look at the trucks they are on. Not corporate!
I’d always heard these were designed to subconsciously nudge other drivers toward the middle of their own lanes (“OMG spikes Karen…can’t risk the Chrysler!”) to promote (marginally) better visibility of them from the trucker’s pov. Appreciate the unpacking Mercedes!
The first time I saw a wheel attachment that nasty looking was in a movie about some guy who ends up in a chariot race.
Purpose? To take out Greased Lightning.
When I was in Germany on the Autobahn last year I noted that all large trucks have discs that are flush with the lug nut so the protruding part of the wheel is basically a flat surface with lug nut holes in it. I wondered why that isn’t a thing in the US and then immediately realized that in the land of spiked lug nut covers to look cool, likely nobody cares about the safety aspect here.
I was going to say, I’m surprised we didn’t sell any of these to our trucker customers, who would put the STUPIDEST shit on their company owned trucks, but then I saw the bit about them being illegal in Washington.
See plenty of them and I don’t know how this stupid shit is still legal.
They have a purpose? I thought it was a spike dog collar type of thing for the bulldog mascott.
Except that spiked dog collars did have a purpose back when they were used in dog fights.
Dog fights are inhumane. I was thinking more of 80’s fashion.
The most paper thin purpose! Though I suppose you could also say they are damage multipliers in pedestrian incidents.
I wouldn’t mind seeing a person who received personal or property damage that was increased by the spikes using the presence of the spikes as evidence of intent in their lawsuit.
I agree.