Home » The New Electric Ferrari Luce: Magic Mouse, But Car

The New Electric Ferrari Luce: Magic Mouse, But Car

Ferrari Luce Right Front Three Quarters

I can’t help but get the sense that many enthusiasts don’t care about new Ferraris. They can make eleventy million horsepower and have laser beams for windscreen wipers and it still won’t matter. They’re too generic, too unobtanium, no longer objects of desire or even interest. The Ferrari Luce, on the other hand, is interesting. Not just because it’s electric, but because it’s an absolute freak. Welcome to the weirdest Ferrari since the Mondial, and possibly the weirdest Italian car since the Fiat Multipla.

Right, let’s get the specs out of the way first because they somehow aren’t the most interesting thing about the Luce. This EV has four motors kicking out a combined 1,035 horsepower, but don’t think they’re all identical. The front two motors combined can only generate 282 horsepower, which means the two rear motors are responsible for 835 ponies. That should make things lively in more ways than a claimed zero-to-62 mph in 2.5 seconds. A good clip behind the Lucid Air Sapphire and Porsche Taycan Turbo GT, but still seriously rapid. Speaking of pace, Ferrari claims zero-to-124 MPH in 6.8 seconds and a top speed of 193 MPH. What’s the curb weight, you ask? Well, it’s a claimed 4,982 pounds. Luce is Italian for ‘light’, but not that kind of light.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Feeding those motors is the responsibility of a 122 kWh battery pack, although that’s gross rather than net capacity, and don’t expect that gargantuan figure to result in serious range. Ferrari claims 330 miles on the WLTP cycle, about on par with a 2022 Kia EV6 long-range RWD which was rated at 310 miles on the EPA cycle. Expect a final figure around that ballpark for the Luce. In another weird similarity to the aforementioned Kia, the Luce also features an 800-volt architecture, except the Ferrari’s good to actually max out 350 kW DC fast chargers.

Screenshot 2026 05 25 At 5.30.50 pm
Photo credit: Ferrari

As you’d probably expect with something weighing nigh-on 5,000 pounds, Ferrari’s pulled out all the stops to make it go ’round corners. We’re talking active electrohydraulic suspension, four-motor torque vectoring, rear-wheel-steering with up to 2.15 degrees of angle, 265-section front and 315-section rear tires, and the latest version of Ferrari’s dynamics management software. Want to slow down? In addition to up to 500 kW of regenerative braking, the Luce sports 15.4-inch carbon ceramic discs up front and 14.6-inch units out back.

Ferrari Luce Steering Wheel
Photo credit: Ferrari

So then, what about engagement? While simulated V12 F1 car soundtracks would be neat, Ferrari’s gone in the complete opposite direction. Instead, the Luce processes actual sound from the rear drive motors, with various profiles and intensity depending on the drive mode. At the same time, paddle shifters aren’t just there for regenerative braking, the right paddle can adjust available torque, giving a kick in the backside with each pull. And we haven’t even reached the interesting part yet.

Ferrari Luce Profile 1
Photo credit: Ferrari

Designed by Apple veteran Jony Ive and “trustworthy and honest” public toilet designer Marc Newson, the Ferrari Luce is the first car from Maranello to carry the silhouette of a Magic Mouse. It has a dash-to-axle ratio of no, an enormous sweeping roofline, and a serious amount of wedge to the belt line. It’s certainly not objectively beautiful, but it’s also not immediately repulsive in the same way the new Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe is. Electrification has allowed for all sorts of new shapes of cars. This is one of them.

Ferrari Luce Left Front Three Quarters Yellow
Photo credit: Ferrari

You can really tell the Luce’s roots lie in tech design rather than automotive design because there’s just so little typical Ferrari DNA here. While surface tension and thick black trim tries to take some weight out of the bottoms of the doors, there’s still an enormous amount of unbroken metal down each flank. Huge black bezels around vents on the front doors make the Luce look stubbier than its 197.87-inch length suggests. The down-the-road graphic is virtually impossible to anthropomorphize, the rear end treatment looks like it’s nesting an entire other car within it, and this is all only at a macro level.

Ferrari Luce Front
Photo credit: Ferrari

Zoom in on the Luce and you start to notice some outrageous details. While the rear coach doors are precedented by the Purosangue SUV, they barely scratch the surface of the oddities dotted about the exterior. Each windscreen wiper’s resting position is completely vertical, like two Tesla Cybertrucks welded together longitudinally. This is because the Luce has no conventional wiper cowl, and each wiper arm simply sprouts out of an enormous windscreen with a big frit band to meet a giant recessed black hood insert.

Ferrari Luce Rear
Photo credit: Ferrari

Around back, a band of tinted plastic hides four circular inner elements, melding a touch of F355 Berlinetta with a touch of facelift Jaguar XJS. Oh, and while you’d expect the Luce to feature a lineup of wheels all more visually complicated than webs woven by spiders on LSD, you can tick an option box for the cleanest set of five-spoke alloys from Ferrari in decades.

Ferrari Luce Interior
Photo credit: Ferrari

If that isn’t enough visual whiplash for you, just take a look at the interior of the Luce. If you were expecting the dashboard to be a holodeck, you’d be mistaken. Instead, you get loads of leather and aluminum, real buttons and toggle switches, and an uncharacteristically pretty steering wheel reminiscent of the classics. Granted, this shouldn’t be much of a surprise. Metallic finishes are a hallmark of Ive’s Apple tenure, and elements on the OLED infotainment screen and digital instrument cluster bristle with his influence.

Ferrari Luce Rear Three Quarters
Photo credit: Ferrari

Add it all up and the Ferrari Luce is an extremely Marmite proposition. It doesn’t evoke emotion, it evokes a skeptical sort of studiousness, something you don’t normally get from something with a Prancing Horse on the front. At the same time, a €550,000 electric Ferrari was always going to have a buyer pool the size of a shot glass, so why not get bizarre with it? Some might call it a crime, but when the 849 Testarossa looks the way it does and a Ferrari SUV is something you can actually buy, any connotations of sacredness died a long time ago. As long as every future Ferrari doesn’t look like the Luce, I’m okay with it. At least it’ll make the 2075 Pebble Beach lawn more interesting.

Top graphic credit: Ferrari

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
254 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pisco Sour
Pisco Sour
14 days ago

The Jeep Compass of Ferraris. Technically it has the badges and logos but…

Mars
Mars
14 days ago

I do understand I have no shot of being noticed, but the two meanings of “light” in English get separate words in Italian – “luce” being the one for the noun and “legger*” being the one for the adjective.

*In Italian all words are gendered, and consequently all adjectives are also gendered according to the word they refer to (e.g. “un SUV leggero” vs. “una coupé leggera“). This, besides being a great way to spot hacks who looked up a word on Google Translate (e.g. people referring to a car as “bellissimo!”), is obviously a great obstacle to gender neutral language, so a proposed solution is to replace the final vowel with an asterisk as I did above.

So hey, while you’ve had to see the Luce and I’m sorry for that, at least now you got some Italian knowledge to show for it.

Pierre Drescher
Member
Pierre Drescher
14 days ago
Reply to  Mars

You have been noticed!

Mars
Mars
14 days ago

Hooray! Shows what I know

GirchyGirchy
Member
GirchyGirchy
13 days ago
Reply to  Mars

Thank you for this – it was a little annoying to see the misuse on an automotive site, considering the “Superleggera” construction method and branding on Carrozzeria Touring cars beginning in the ’30s. They were behind some of the most beautiful cars made between the ’30s and ’60s. The name continues today with the Carrozzeria Touring Superleggera company today.

Mars
Mars
13 days ago
Reply to  GirchyGirchy

Relevant fun fact: the opposite of “Superleggera” is “Superpesante”, which is actually one of the gender neutral adjectives! (Still changes in plural form, though, to “superpesanti“.)

Evo_CS
Evo_CS
14 days ago

When it come to cars that “think differently” I am not sure Ferrari is what one imagines. I appreciate some of the unusual executions here (the windshield diving to and underneath the front end is distinctive) but I’m missing so much passion. Bizarre? For sure, and sometimes bizarre can create some drama, but everything here is presented in a design that doesn’t stir any passion. To me, that’s a pretty big crime of omission here.

Hangover Grenade
Hangover Grenade
14 days ago

The rear of this thing is violently and aggressively ugly. It’s like a little baby car inside a big void.

RW
RW
14 days ago

This would have made so much more sense as a Maserati or an Alfa. I guess they needed to get the horsey on it to be able to afford those designers. I predict this will go down like the Lamborghini LM002.

Surely they will sell some, but why would you want this over a Lucid or even a Rolls Spectre?

Scotticus
Member
Scotticus
14 days ago

Objectively I don’t mind this thing. It’s just not a Ferrari.

EricTheViking
EricTheViking
14 days ago

Each windscreen wiper’s resting position is completely vertical…

SEAT León (second generation, 1P) has windscreen wipers mounted vertically, giving the windscreen clean look.

Last edited 14 days ago by EricTheViking
Horizontally Opposed
Member
Horizontally Opposed
14 days ago

You compared it to the AMG GT, lol. And I love the adjective chosen overall: “bizarre” which implies agency and originality, while I think this is an anonymous blob of Design Hubrisium. This new material has definitely been making the rounds in the last few years BTW!

It can go sit in the same air-conditioned warehouse collection of failed odd ducks next to the Type 01 and Cybertruck, as far as I am concerned.

JP15
Member
JP15
14 days ago

It looks like a refresh of the Jaguar i-Pace. It’s really weird, but I’m not even remotely the target demographic for this kind of thing, so I’m unbothered one way or the other.

The interior looks great though.

Strangek
Member
Strangek
14 days ago

Bleh. Why does it look like that?

67 Oldsmobile
Member
67 Oldsmobile
14 days ago

You are right on,it does look like a mix between a Apple phone and a public toilet. How did Ferrari sign off this thing? Does Ferrari and Mercedes have the same design chief?

Gilbert Wham
Gilbert Wham
14 days ago
Reply to  67 Oldsmobile

I mean, I hate it, but it’s nowhere near as tasteless as a new Mercedes.

OrigamiSensei
Member
OrigamiSensei
14 days ago

It’s not entirely unattractive, but there’s not a single thing about it that says “Ferrari”.

I am especially unconcerned about dash-to-axle, as I find a number of cab-forward designs to be attractive as well as practical.

The front, front 3/4, and side profile are fine; that rear end is “woof”.

Those simple five-spoke wheels look very good.

I also applaud Ferrari for resisting the more and bigger screens temptation.

I would be concerned about the vertical wiper blades if any of these were ever going to see snow or even debris like leaves. The point of starting low is to push unwanted materials up and away on the initial stroke. Sweeping down on the initial stroke pushes unwanted things down into the cowl area, making it more difficult to either remove materials or later let airflow blow it away.

Nonetheless, I’ll still take a pre-CA smog 365 GT4 2+2 with a V-12 and manual.

MikeInTheWoods
Member
MikeInTheWoods
14 days ago

Was the vehicle designed by the animators of Wall-E? It looks like the movie cast of robots is missing Luce.
Great movie on social commentary of humans and capitalism, terrible Ferrari.

Buddybears
Buddybears
14 days ago

This looks like it could come from a company called Xiwangli and made by a vacuum cleaner company in China.

Fruit Snack
Fruit Snack
14 days ago

The designers did everything right, but for the wrong company.

Goblin
Goblin
14 days ago

A tragic mistake occurred during the PR packaging, the actual model name to use is the Temurario.

As pictures are still not a thing on this board, we’ll have to link up:

The Temurario

Last edited 14 days ago by Goblin
Horizontally Opposed
Member
Horizontally Opposed
14 days ago
Reply to  Goblin

Ouch, kinda on point although I feel a knockoff woulda been a bit closer to the Ferrari spirit because they wanted the brand pull.

Stryker_T
Member
Stryker_T
14 days ago

oh dude, that 3/4 rear view really shows off how bad that back end is.

Hotdoughnutsnow
Hotdoughnutsnow
14 days ago
Reply to  Stryker_T

Maybe because of the color, but it looks like cover art for the pending LEGO version.

Stryker_T
Member
Stryker_T
14 days ago

that is the same simple background, back quarter angle, that Lego likes to use for the back of their boxes for car sets.

Ben
Member
Ben
14 days ago
Reply to  Stryker_T

Came to the comments to say the same thing. It looks like Ferrari took a normal car and draped…whatever this is…over top of it.

Peter Andruskiewicz
Member
Peter Andruskiewicz
14 days ago
Reply to  Stryker_T

The taillights scream “mid-2000’s Chevy Impala” too… not really the reference you want your Ferrari to be associated with

Really No Regrets
Member
Really No Regrets
14 days ago

The design is fine. It’s cohesive, if plain. It’s not an SUV.
It doesn’t say “Ferrari” to me, though I’m not the target audience. Seems they didn’t show it in the typical red to emphasize that it’s something new, different. I wonder what the Luce will do to the brand loyalty of those who pine for scoops and separated wings and sharp angles, etc. Maybe Ferrari wants more youthful buyers, who have new money…

I wonder if The Bishop will have time to graft on a long roof for more utility. I’d really like to see that. It doesn’t need to be brown.

BlownGP
BlownGP
14 days ago

No way this can be a Ferrari. This is horrible.

Ottomottopean
Member
Ottomottopean
14 days ago

I’m going to buck the trend in the comments and say I kinda like this. It just doesn’t feel like a Ferrari.

And maybe it’s the color options shown in the photos but I’m strongly reminded of the Tron light cycles here. In a good way!

I could never see paying over a half million for one but I think the design is strong and I appreciate they did something different with the packaging that an EV affords without being weird for the sake of being “futuristic.” All the lines seem well thought out and the proportions are nice.

Still doesn’t look like a Ferrari but that might be why I like it.

TDI_FTW
Member
TDI_FTW
14 days ago

That is certainly a car that exists. But should not.

Mayor McZombie
Mayor McZombie
14 days ago

This is an awful misfire.

John Fischer
John Fischer
14 days ago

Those exposed wipers are just awful.

Gubbin
Member
Gubbin
14 days ago

OK, but do you have to turn it over on its back to plug in the charge cable?

A Tangle of Kraken
Member
A Tangle of Kraken
14 days ago
Reply to  Gubbin

USB-A only

77 SR5 LIftback
Member
77 SR5 LIftback
14 days ago

If your design position is engineering the best electric car possible…then make it a Ferrari…then this is a successful design effort.

Breaking this down. Tesla (VW and MB) set very similar engineering requirements using their own technology/experience. Once they reached an optimized aerodynamic form…they then backed off and added “brand” identity.

Since the optimized aerodynamics is nearly identical for all manufacturers who want a 4 door electric car with usable trunk/frunk spaces…the end game will collapse around one typical generic shape.

As much as this thing looks like a Tesla (or Prius) …its simply because Tesla engineers were permitted to stick to the slipperiest shape without needing to reference any historical brand identity.

Ivy’s genius aside…the engineering took control of this project and what resulted is an Ivy interior with some exterior cosmetics sufficiently interesting to allow them to drop yellow prancing horse badges on all 4 sides.

The stinker is that Tesla can extract $50k from its consumers for this package and Ferrari gets $500k. Is the Ferrari 10x better than a Tesla M3? While the cars are generically similar…the target market are no where near each other…so why even compare.

This is the “Get me to work cheap” Tesla crowd vs. the “Look at me, I have surplus income” crowd. Nether one has any desire to hang out in the other’s dealership and comparison shop.

Last edited 14 days ago by 77 SR5 LIftback
Gubbin
Member
Gubbin
14 days ago

Yeah, the tyranny of aerodynamics has always pointed to fish-shaped EV/hybrid sedans and limpet-shaped supercars. It’s funny to me to think of Teslas as “cheap” but that’s how Sterling’s Viridian thinking works: introduce green/electric technologies as premium goods, sell the convenience and smoothness and silence, and then move down the market as production costs drop and demand grows.

CR-V Oswald
Member
CR-V Oswald
13 days ago

What is that genius you speak of when referring to Jony Ive?

77 SR5 LIftback
Member
77 SR5 LIftback
12 days ago
Reply to  CR-V Oswald

Jony Ive single handedly focused Apple’s design aesthetic for more than 30 years. Ferrari effort aside…anyone with a passing understanding of industrial design and human factors would consider his portfolio the definition of an Industrial Design Genius.

254
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x