Home » Thrill To Four Dull Commercials For Dazzlingly Boring ’70s And ’80s Cars!

Thrill To Four Dull Commercials For Dazzlingly Boring ’70s And ’80s Cars!

Cs Cutlass Yawn

Wow! Who is ready to start their day with a big, frothy injection of Vitamin Ennui? Who feels like blasting their way into the morning on a rocket fueled by the potent hypergolic combination of tedium and tiresomeness? You do, that’s who, and I’m here to help you, by providing you with four commercials, all from the mid-to-late-’70s and early ’80s, that are for cars that you would need an electrified give-a-shit-o-matic just to even donate the tiniest of poops about.

Yes, these are boring commercials for, charitably, boring cars. Now, I’ve been in this business long enough to know that pretty much any car has a core group of fanatics that love them, and I think that’s positively delightful. I’m all but certain all of the cars represented here today have their adherents, and to those people I half-heartedly apologize in advance: I mean no harm. You can like what you like, always.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

That said, I don’t think there’s a real way around the fact that these are all pretty enthusiastically boring cars. Not bad cars, as such, and often quite successful ones, but just, you know, boring. Cars that just kind of disappear into the background of life, cars so nondescript that, were one to run you over, the only thing you could remember about it was that it had tires, most likely four of them.

You know, real sleeping pills. Like this first boring car, the 1978 Ford Fairmont:

Now, yes, I get that the Fairmont was the first car to use the legendary Fox platform, soon to be beloved by Mustang-people, but that doesn’t save the Fairmont from being a boxy and forgettable genericmobile. How would you describe a Fairmont other than “it looks like a car.” Like, the car in most NO PARKING signs.

And this commercial, damn, they weren’t stingy with the boring in this commercial at all. Sure, it starts exciting with those Fairmonts loudly crashing through that US map, and then lumbers into a bunch of parked Fairmonts talking about how much space you get per cubic dollar or some shit like that. And that kids grow up, not down. It’s all fine, but the virtues showcased in this commercial are so mild that they make a bowl of farina feel like a spicy trip to the Bahamas while on fire.

Ugh, these things were so dull. Even more dull than this dull car, the Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme:

Holy crap, that’s a boring commercial. A woman just talking to you while pacing around a parked ’76 Cutlass Supreme Broham as her silent partner, Jack, unloads luggage, tears of boredom welling up in his eyes as he wonders what the hell he’s doing with his life.

She’s pretty happy, perhaps due to some sort of head injury, as she calmly states some positive traits about the car, even describing the overstuffed and velour-slathered interior as “absolutely beautiful.” This whole commercial reads like a half-paid-attention-to conversation in the line to take care of some tedious paperwork at the DMV.

Here, delight at this legendarily boring car, the 1977 Dodge Diplomat, but this time there has been some attempt to mask the car’s inherent ignoribility by leveraging everyone’s favorite cocaine-addicted detective, Sherlock Holmes:

The crime-solving duo is working on a case attempting to find missing Ford and Chevy buyers who, I think we can assume, were willingly euthanized after getting lulled into a comatose state by the intensely forgettable qualities of the Diplomat.

Sure, Holmes seems impressed, but remember, that dude is probably high as a freaking kite.

Okay, one more! Let’s amp the stakes a bit with this remarkably and powerfully boring car, the Mercury Topaz, and couple that with some of the most bland and forgettable things one can broadcast on television: ordinary fucking people.

Would you look at that! Some guy is looking for a car that is “put together, real well!” And then a woman wants something “solid” and “quiet,” like a healthy bowel movement, followed by another woman dreaming of “workmanship.” The commercial even describes the development process of the Topaz as a “slow and frustrating process,” words that, if they fail to get you positively vibrating with excitement, I would suggest you have a doctor confirm you’re metabolizing.

Dear lord, what snooze festivals all these are. These all have beige auras, vivid, intense beiges with hints of putty and taupe. I’ve made myself so very sleepy now, thanks to these soporific wonders. Feel free to disagree with me in the comments and let me know how wrong I am, and how thrilling a Topaz or Diplomat actually was.

Until then, though, I need a nap.

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LongCoolLincoln
Member
LongCoolLincoln
1 month ago

Does the Diplomat commercial say “weirdly understated four-door”? I can’t imagine why they would describe a car like that, but I’ve listened to it like five times and that’s what I’m hearing.

Rich Mason
Rich Mason
1 month ago

I always dug the old Cougar commercials.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

Not sure where you are going here. That is just the way most commercials were done. A simple listing of popular features, similar to a game show where the car was given away. Perhaps show a commercial for a CV-2 of the same age to show us the way it should be done?
Just a heads up I can’t post them here but they really really really suck.

Lotsofchops
Member
Lotsofchops
1 month ago

“We’d love it even without the low price!…. but not as much” is a crazy quote to leave in a commercial. Good job Ford.

Last edited 1 month ago by Lotsofchops
Cloud Shouter
Cloud Shouter
1 month ago

Since the voting box is missing, I choose the Diplomat.

Dr Funkhole
Member
Dr Funkhole
1 month ago

My grandfather had a Diplomat coupe. My cousins and I dubbed it the the FSDD, for Fiendishly Seductive Dodge Diplomat. I, for one, was fiendishly seduced.

Pneumatic Tool
Pneumatic Tool
1 month ago

You can’t tell me that the couple from the Olds ad wasn’t heading to a key party.

Peter Spinale
Peter Spinale
1 month ago
Reply to  Pneumatic Tool

I was going to suggest serial killers.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago
Reply to  Peter Spinale

Perhaps killing Mr Smith? Decades ahead of its time good advertising work.

Beer-light Guidance
Member
Beer-light Guidance
1 month ago
Reply to  Pneumatic Tool

I was thinking that she was being checked into some sort of institution under the pretense of going on vacation.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
1 month ago

What amazes me is that my Mercedes-Benz has the same gas mileage ratings as that Olds with the standard 6.

Of course my Mercedes probably has about 2.5x as much power….

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

But weighs 10x as much so same speed

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
1 month ago

The Olds is about the same weight as my smaller Mercedes – but the aerodynamics are far better on my car.

SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
1 month ago

That Topaz ad sounds like a game of Buzzword Bingo at an 80’s business retreat.
Not how real people discuss their cars.

Last edited 1 month ago by SlowCarFast
Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
1 month ago

Now, yes, I get that the Fairmont was the first car to use the legendary Fox platform, soon to be beloved by Mustang-people,

I’m told that mustang-people have a lot of trouble with stairs.

Dodsworth
Member
Dodsworth
1 month ago

I remember when you couldn’t swing a dead cat without hitting a Cutlass Supreme. It’s what all the Camaro owners went to as they got older. I still like the cars but I’m a sucker for personal luxury coupes. I never knew there was a two door Diplomat. That’s news to me. My mother once rented a Fairmont. She said it was made out of cardboard and the horn didn’t work. Oh,the scowl on her face when I showed her the horn. Priceless!

Canopysaurus
Member
Canopysaurus
1 month ago

To quote Richard Nixon (or maybe Rich Little), “Let me say this about that, Zzzzzzzz …”

Nlpnt
Member
Nlpnt
1 month ago

Nothing about the ’78 Mercury Cougar?

Royal Deluxe II: SNL’s Hilarious Bris Commercial | TikTok

“Benjamin Cantor”, yeah, right. We all know that kid’s gotta be you, Torch.

Cletus8269
Cletus8269
1 month ago

i’ll say this much, you cant get more classy than those waterfall grilles.

Last edited 1 month ago by Cletus8269
Bill C
Member
Bill C
1 month ago
Reply to  Cletus8269

There’s a reason why people bought a gazillion Cutlass Supremes in the 70’s & 80’s. They were everywhere.

LTDScott
Member
LTDScott
1 month ago

As the owner of a ’79 Fairmont with the 200-6, any discussion of fuel economy goes out the door considering I have to floor it to merge on the freeway, go uphill, etc. and it’s not very happy above 70 MPH due to the 3 speed auto. Of course things were different in the 55 MPH Malaise Era.

Fredzy
Member
Fredzy
1 month ago

And then a woman wants something “solid” and “quiet,” like a healthy bowel movement,

This had me doing that futilely suppressed very-painful-due-to-recent-core-workout/sore abs laugh despite not having done any core workout recently.

Username, the Movie
Member
Username, the Movie
1 month ago

I agree with the boring-ness of all of these. I have a soft spot for Fairmonts since they are the ultimate sleeper, but that largely due to the fact that yes they are the most generic, boring seeming car ever. As you pointed out, they are on the fox chassis and can be easily modded to be absurdly fast, which makes me like them far more than the show-offs in their fox mustangs. Full disclosure, I had an 84 LTD LX which was basically a Fairmont that they attempted to add style to, but they succeeded only in making a slightly different, super generic car. I LS turbo swapped it and lived the sleep dream for years!

LTDScott
Member
LTDScott
1 month ago

As the owner of a ’79 Fairmont and an ’85 LTD LX I can say the LTD feels much more solid and better put together. The 6 extra years of development paid off.

Username, the Movie
Member
Username, the Movie
1 month ago
Reply to  LTDScott

True, I did always enjoy being in the LTD. It was a solid car and was comfortable. Much more comfortable than the newer SN95/New Edge mustangs that were also based on the fox chassis, and I have not spent much time in a Fairmont. My LTD had automatic headlights, which actually functioned!

Argentine Utop
Member
Argentine Utop
1 month ago

The “real people” in the Topaz ad looks like taken from The Simpsons. All of them.
That makes the ad (at least) ironically cool. Not the Topaz. It still is unironically boring.

Red865
Member
Red865
1 month ago
Reply to  Argentine Utop

At least you could get a Topaz with a V6 and 5spd to spice things up a bit! One of my roommates had one of these. More rare was AWD version.

Nlpnt
Member
Nlpnt
1 month ago
Reply to  Red865

V6 wasn’t avaiable at launch, not until several years later. I think the AWD option had come and gone before it (and was auto only).

I had an ’84 Topaz with a 4 speed manual, I sincerely hope that I was (at least at that time in my life) a lot less boring than the people who bought one new a decade before.

Griznant
Member
Griznant
1 month ago

Thanks a pantload Jason.

My family owned three of the four, two of which are the exact same year featured and one the exact color!

’76 Olds Cutlass Supreme, two door, silver; Check
’78 Fairmont, wagon flavor, beige; Check
’90 Mercury Topaz (the refreshed *good* looking one); Check

No Diplomat though, thank God.

Tbird
Member
Tbird
1 month ago
Reply to  Griznant

We had a ’77 Cutlass Supreme followed by an ’81 Fairmont.

Last edited 1 month ago by Tbird
Bill C
Member
Bill C
1 month ago
Reply to  Griznant

We were close!
We had a Regal. Dad liked Mk2 Granada wagons, but we didn’t have one. We had a Tempo, not a Topaz. And we didn’t have a Diplomat, but the one-time Mopar was a Lebaron GTS, turbo of course.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago

“Sure, Holmes seems impressed, but remember, that dude is probably high as a freaking kite.”

Is that not Ricardo Montalbán?

Jay Vette
Member
Jay Vette
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

He said nothing about soft Corinthian leather, so probably not

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  Jay Vette

I’m sure he would have if the car had it.

Spikersaurusrex
Member
Spikersaurusrex
1 month ago

I love that the lady in the Fairmont ad would still like the car if it cost more, just not as much. I guess it was fine… for the price.

Jack Trade
Member
Jack Trade
1 month ago

In fairness, these aren’t that different than the ads for today’s crossovers (Dodge’s inadvertently hilarious over the top ones aside). Most of those pretty overtly purport to sell you something else – peace of mind, the outdoors, that your friends might think you’re cool – than the car itself. It’s getting rare for ads to even mention anything technical about the vehicle itself.

Joe User
Member
Joe User
1 month ago
Reply to  Jack Trade

For real. Say what you will about these cars, at least they aren’t crossovers. And none of these ads appear to be selling a ‘lifestyle’.

Flyingstitch
Flyingstitch
1 month ago

I’m not sure if Topax is an accidental typo, but it sounds like a sedative, so I’ll allow it.

Ford Fairmont…for reasons. OK, they slipped in “lots of,” but still, the desperation…

Olds lady truly sounds like she needs deprogramming.

These are all way funnier than they have any right to be, even before Jason’s commentary.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  Flyingstitch

“Olds lady truly sounds like she needs deprogramming.”

Pretty typical for those 1970s Stepford Wives. The new ones are much better.

Last edited 1 month ago by Cheap Bastard
Kevin B
Kevin B
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

I have no empirical evidence, just casual observation, but why do women’s purses get bigger as they get older? Look at hers, she’s at least 15 years ahead of herself. In another 10 years it will look like carry-on luggage.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  Kevin B

Diaper bag training?

Rich Mason
Rich Mason
1 month ago
Reply to  Kevin B

I once weighed my wife’s purse.
24 lbs plus the 3 lb weight of purse itself.
BTW she weighed less than 100 lbs.

Yes, she could definitely drag a ton of shit around with her.
That’s when I finally figured out why she was so damn strong for her size.

Last edited 1 month ago by Rich Mason
42
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x