This will come as no surprise to regular readers, but I don’t really like newer cars very much. I never thought I’d be one of those people whose taste in cars (and music and movies) essentially froze in my thirties, but here I am in my fifties pretending anything made after 2005 doesn’t exist. This week, however, I’m going to try to explore the newer car market. I’m going to try to stick to cars no more than fifteen years old, starting with these two little runabouts.
Friday was an experiment: What happens if I show you two obviously overpriced cars, and give you an escape hatch in the poll? Well, what happens is most of you take it. Fully seventy-five percent of you noped out. So that’s enough of that. We’re now back to our usual “you must choose” rules.
If I throw out the “none” votes, the winner on Friday was the black Colt GT, which is my favorite of the two. Putting a wood-rimmed Nardi steering wheel in a basic economy car is my kind of silly, and while I still think they’re both overpriced, if forced to choose, I’ll take the less expensive option.

Gas prices right now, to put it plainly, suck. It’s almost never worth it to think about trading in a car to get better mileage, but I can’t say that I don’t look at the small cars on the road with some envy, as our Hemi- and LS-powered cars gulp down unleaded like a rock star on a bender. You never want to see $100 on the pump total. And with the two little cars we’re going to look at today, you never will – unless prices really went crazy. Let’s check them out.
2013 Chevrolet Spark – $3,900

Engine/drivetrain: 1.2-liter DOHC inline 4, four-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Chicago, IL
Odometer reading: 171,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Chevy’s history of tiny captive imports dates all the way back to 1985, when the Suzuki-built Chevy Sprint was introduced. The Sprint gave way to the legendary Geo Metro, which stuck around for more than a decade before being replaced by the Daewoo-built Chevy Aveo. And in 2013, the Spark, also based on a Daewoo design, replaced the Aveo. Now, of course, you can’t get any small cars at all at a Chevy dealership, which feels like a mistake to me, but what do I know?

The Spark is powered by a tiny 1.2-liter four cylinder making just 84 horsepower. But it’s a lightweight car, especially by modern standards, so it’s enough. This first-year Spark has a traditional four-speed torque-converter-type automatic; later Sparks had the dreaded Jatco CVT. This transmission is said to be less efficient, but a lot more reliable. You could spec a five-speed manual as well, but few buyers did. This Spark has covered 171,000 miles, but the seller says it runs and drives like new.

The condition of the interior at that mileage shows that someone has taken care of this car. The tree air freshener is a little worrying, but I know some people actually like the smell of those stupid things, so I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt. The seller says everything works as it should.

Sparks came in a whole rainbow of colors, as a small economy car should. This pale rosy pink, called “Techno Pink” by Chevy, is actually one of the more subtle options. It’s in good condition outside, but it almost looks like some body panels don’t quite match. I’ve noticed that on other cars as well, and I can never tell if it’s a trick of the light in the photo, or if the paint fades more on the plastic parts than on the sheetmetal, or what.
2014 Fiat 500 Sport – $3,999

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 1.4-liter OHC inline 4, six-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Plainfield, IL
Odometer reading: 75,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
You can pretty much blame Volkswagen for this car. VW’s Concept One show car in 1994 was a big hit, and became the New Beetle in 1998. BMW, after acquiring the Rover Group and with it the Mini brand, saw the Beetle and thought, “Hey, we can do that, too!” Fiat, not to be left out, introduced its own modern version of the iconic 500 in 2007, and brought it to the US in 2012. It isn’t quite the pared-down people’s car that the old 500 was, but then, the modern Mini and Beetle weren’t exactly bare-bones cars either.

This is the Sport model of the 500, with a turbocharger on its 1.4-liter MultiAir four cylinder. It drives the front wheels through a six-speed Aisin automatic, which is a bit of a letdown, but maybe the extra horsepower makes up for it. It’s a one-owner car with only 75,000 miles on it, and the seller says it runs and drives well.

I’ve always liked the interior treatment of these 500s. The body-colored dash panel, the cream-colored accents, and the overall stylishness of it is a nice change from the bland gray plastic appointments of most small cars. It’s in really good condition, as you would hope with the low mileage.

This one is a good color as well; you don’t see many brown cars these days. It’s also in really good condition. Personally, I think Fiat did a better job modernizing the 500 than BMW did the Mini. These are good-looking little cars.
It may not be worth trading in your gas guzzler on one of these, but if you’re looking for a car anyway, one glance at the numbers on the gas station sign could have you thinking small. Your choices for today are a simple no-nonsense hatchback from a domestic brand, though it’s built in Korea, or a stylish Italian mini built in Mexico. These things are from everywhere. Which one could find a home in your driveway?









The Fiat for me. As I own a Rosso 500 Abarth (car turned 14 years old this month) they are fun to drive as well as being fuel efficient.
Missed this vote, but I would’ve gone for the espresso colored Fiat. Then I’d figure out how to transplant an espresso maker in it. The automatic would be fine, because I couldn’t shift gears and pour coffee easily. Nice wheels, too. Maybe I need to consider one of these for a city driver?
These both came as extraordinarily efficient and quite fun EV versions too, which is where you’d really see a savings. There are a couple of Spark EVs in the family and they are fantastic little cars.
500 for me.
One of my friends asked me to help with the sale of his Spark. Same year as this but it was blue and with the 5 spd. I kept the car for a couple weeks while he was out of town and ended up making the deal with its new owner.
A Geo Metro felt more substantial than the 1st gen Spark despite the age difference. And it really struggled on the hwy. The 500 feels way more confident, it’s much nicer, and has more pep with or without the turbo.
You never want to see $100 on the pump total ?
Europeans : laughing… and crying
Either would be fine as “an car” but if I had to drive one of those, I’m team Fiat, all the way. I’ve never owned a French car and here’s my chance! Both seem like a fair price in today’s crazy market.
I like the Spark better on the outside but the winner to me is newer, lower mileage, nice interior with a turbo Fiat
The 100k-mile delta sort of skews this competition. If both cars had the same mileage, I might put my money on the Chevy. I’ve driven those 500s, and they are fun but seemingly always about to break in one way or another. The fact that Chevy sold so many Sparks without the nostalgia baiting speaks to… something.
This is exactly why I chose the Chevy. Even if the Fiat is 100k miles “newer,” I’m willing to bet it will still breakdown far more often than the Chevy. And I buy cars to drive them, not to have them sit in my driveway waiting to be repaired.
My thought as well. 3 miles on the Chevy is likely equivalent to 1 on the Fiat.
I picked the 500. The fact that my 500 Abarth is soon to appear on Cars & Bids? Not a coincidence.
Fiat, some multi air issues are a small price to pay to not be in a pink Daewoo with 171k mi. Plus fiat alot more go kart like. Also $3,900 for a spark with 171k mi is absolutely crack pot. You could buy those for under $10k new. Fiat pricing is realistic.
Chocolate coloured Fiat with a white steering wheel? Yes thank you.
Granny hair coloured Daewoo? Not really.
I voted Fiat, although I prefer the humble 500 Pop with the NA 1.4 Multi-Air. We have a 2013 500 Pop and it’s entertaining and economical (27mpg local, 47mpg highway). A Spark with a manual might be interesting but a slushbox makes it a penalty box
I’ve always had a certain respect for the Spark. It’s a decent no-b.s. car for what it is. I’ve seen GM Daewoo’s endure unspeakable abuse and keep going. It’s more miles than I’d want, but WTF? The color is not my top choice, but put on some rally wheels and some lights up front and just go with it. I’d imagine with good tires it would be a superb “winter car” for those that need such things, or just a handy hatchback/ runabout/ spare car. (I like the later, facelifted version even better, in the “ACTIV” trim and a 5-spd, but those would be near impossible to find)
I almost voted for the Spark because (1) I like both the shape and the color, and (b) at least one Chicagoland craigslist reader agrees with 83-ish percent of poll respondents, because it’s gone daddy, gone. But with a lot fewer miles and what appears to be a suburban location (so those miles were probably easier than the Spark’s), the Fiat had
practicallypracticality on its side along with emotion. While it lasted, anyway.Ive driven these sparks before and not that bad, but gawd it yearns for a stick.
Better the devil i know as an auto gm than the random ever faults of the italians
As a Fiat 500 owner and wrenches, I can these are actually reliable and have only minor faults. My car had the usual bad thermostat, bad trunk release and bad Bluetooth module draining the battery. The thermostat is a minor PITA but cheap, the trunk handle is fixable with a modified Dodge Caravan part, and the Bluetooth module can be excised with simple tools and AlfaOBD.
Most of the ones from people i know, were nearly never ending money pits, but they did enjoy flogging em good.
I really dig the styling on em over the spark though.
I had a Spark like this one as a rental and was surprised at how well it drove, even on the freeway. The last Fiat I drove was a friend’s 124 back in college. I detest the 500’s styling inside and out. And that brown reminds me of a BMW Bavaria that nearly bankrupted me back in the ’80s. I appear to be in the not so vast minority here and chose the Spark.
“Fully seventy-five percent of you noped out.”
@Mark Sanfilippo Tucker You gave us a non-choice between two overpriced examples of the same pile of crap and were then surprised that the rejection rate was that high? Come on.
If you had given us that choice on the Firebird vs Probe day, I bet the nope-out rate would have been pretty low.
Fix It Again Tony! I’ve never liked Fiat 500’s but gotta go w/ that because that Spark is just such an awful design. I would hate owning it and would never look back at it after parking. At least the 500 has low miles and I have heard at least a few good things about them among all the bad. At least it’s kinda tossable too
“The tree air freshener”
“There’s one in every car…you’ll see”
I’m biased as I daily a manual turbo Fiat 500 in olive green and it is the highest fun-to-cost ratio of any car that I’ve ever owned. My only mod so far was swapping the original radio for an Xtrons with CarPlay. I recently drove it 1,200 miles round trip to Canada to pick my son up from university. It was a blast and I got 38 mpg.
I get the same fuel economy on long trips in my ’17 Accord V6 but I’m sure you have more fun with the manual Turbo 500.
I’ve owned many Fiats over the years and the only thig that would make the 500 better is if it had a manual. I’ve driven a 500 with a manual on windy roads and it’s a fun car.
I’ve long been FIAT (Fix It Again Tony) curious. Gotta go Fiat 500. Also, can’t resist a turbo! The style is excellent. Brown? Like a little turd – definitely an Autopian car.
The Fiat all day every day. The rear doors on the Spark are pointless, as no actual adults can fit back there (I’m 6′, and I literally had to tilt my head sideways as there’s no headroom whatsoever). The ride is atrociously bad even for an economy car, and the interior fabrics and plastics are so cheap that Dollar Tree looks like Gucci by comparison.
I had a 500 as a rental car for a few months while my Subaru was in the body shop, and I loved it. Interior plastics aren’t stellar in the 500 either, but at least they tried to blend some styling in there, and it drove great for what it was.