The Corvette accounts for just a tiny fraction of Chevrolet’s overall sales volume, less than 1.4% in 2025. But like other halo models such as the Mustang at Ford, it accounts for a disproportionate amount of interest in the brand, both among enthusiasts and car buyers at large. People may come into a showroom and spend time looking at a Corvette, but then drive off in something completely different, often a new truck or SUV. Why is this important? Because consumers recognize that there is shared DNA between the Corvette and a Silverado in that small block V8 engine, and the 2027 model is getting a new sixth-generation version of that long-running powerplant and the return of the Grand Sport model.
Back in 1953, when the Corvette debuted, it was powered exclusively by Chevrolet’s 3.9-liter inline six-cylinder engine. It wasn’t until 1955 that it finally got the original small-block V8, and since then, every production Corvette built has had eight cylinders arranged in a V-pattern. Apart from the big-block V8s that were offered as an option in the 1960s and early 1970s, all the rest have had 4.4-inch bore spacing, including the current twin-cam LT6 and LT7 engines in the Z06, ZR1 and ZR1X.

For model year 2027, the Corvette will be the first vehicle to get the sixth-generation small-block, retaining that same bore spacing but now with more displacement, more power, and more torque. At some point after the Corvette launch, GM will also debut a new generation of full-size pickups and SUVs that use variants of this same engine, which GM has been developing at the same time that it made enormous investments in electric vehicles. While GM hasn’t been cancelling its EV programs, it has written down much of what it invested in battery plants and has been shuffling some of its production plans, including where it would build those engines. That included scaling back its plans to produce more electric motors at its Tonawanda, New York, propulsion plant so it could build more V8s for trucks.

But the first plant to produce these engines will actually be in Flint, Mich., not far from where the first Corvettes were produced. Flint will be producing the LS6 V8 that becomes the new standard powerplant for Corvette starting this fall. It will be used in the Stingray, the new Grand Sport, and the Grand Sport X.
What’s The 2027 LS6?

After transitioning to LT branding on Corvette engines since the launch of the C7 in 2014, the first sixth-gen V8 is reverting back to LS this year, starting with LS6 (for no discernible reason). The standard engine displacement for small-block Corvettes for more than 20 years has been 6.2 liters, but the LS6 bumps that up to 6.7 liters thanks to an 8 mm longer stroke than the outgoing LT2. The compression ratio is also bumped up to 13:1 from the previous 11.5:1, making it the highest ever in a series production small-block.

The engineers have also integrated a new tunnel ram air intake manifold with high-velocity ports for better breathing. Like many other newer engines, the LS6 has dual injectors for every cylinder, one in the intake port and one directly in the cylinder for cleaner emissions and better driveability under all conditions. The throttle body has been increased in diameter from 87 mm to 95 mm
Making more power over the long haul requires upgrading a lot of other components. Both the pistons and connecting rods are now forged rather than cast to better withstand the stresses of that compression ratio, and there is a two-barrel oil supply to the crankshaft. The coolant paths through the cylinder heads have also been redesigned to provide more targeted cooling around the combustion chambers for better durability.

Tri-Y exhaust manifolds that are claimed to improve the sound output of the LS6. While the standard exhaust setup for the LS6 will continue to be the corner-mounted dual outlets we’ve had on the C8 since it launched, an optional center exhaust will be available as an option for the first time with a small-block on this Corvette generation. Apart from the core dimensions of bore spacing and camshaft position, virtually no parts are carried over from the fifth-generation V8.
The LS6 in the 2027 Corvette will be rated at 535-horsepower and 520 lb-ft of torque, an increase of 45-hp and 55 lb-ft. The torque curve exceeds the LT2 across the board but really picks up steam from about 1,800 rpm and peaks at around 4,500 rpm. GM isn’t giving out any specific performance numbers yet, but since a C8 Stingray can hit 60 mph in the low three-second range, this should continue to be a true performance bargain.

The LS6 will live in the Stingray, Grand Sport, and Grand Sport X, with the latter model effectively being a replacement for the e-Ray with its all-wheel-drive hybrid system. The Grand Sport X will produce 721-hp, a slightly larger performance gap from the base V8 than in the e-Ray.
Taking lessons learned from the development of the twin-turbocharged, hybrid ZR1X, the Corvette engineers are now using more of the available storage from the 1.9-kWh lithium-ion battery, which gives them more voltage to work with and thus more power. They also made changes to the case and bearings for the front-axle-mounted motor to withstand the increased torque loading to get an extra 26-horsepower.
With its extra weight, the GS-X might not necessarily be the best Corvette for track days, but with an extra 186-hp and all-wheel-drive, it might just be the best all-around Vette. You can even sneak back into your neighborhood late at night or leave early in the morning without annoying the neighbors by using the stealth mode that allows the GS-X to go up to 50 mph silently on the motor.
Bringing back the Grand Sport

Apart from the LS6, the base Stingray largely carries over from model year 2026, when it already got an updated interior. The fifth edition of the Grand Sport is new to the C8 lineup for 2027, and according to Corvette chief engineer Josh Holder, it represents the sweet spot in the lineup with a combination of approachable performance for most people. In this case, the Grand Sport features the wide-body layout of the Z06 and ZR1 but retains the more affordable small-block. Chevrolet isn’t talking pricing yet, but the 2026 Stingray starts at $72,495, so we’d expect the Grand Sport to come in at under $100,000. Not cheap, but considering the bang for the buck, it’s very hard to beat.

Apart from the wide-body layout, the GS comes standard with magnetic ride control, a touring suspension, and Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 tires. Those that want something more can get the Z52 performance package that swaps in Pilot Sport 4S summer tires, the higher-performance J56 iron brake package that is standard on the Z06, and a stiffer suspension setup. Those who plan to take their GS to track days on a regular basis can get the track pack, which substitutes a carbon ceramic brake package and Pilot Sport Cup 2R tires. The Track pack also adds a carbon fiber splitter, dive planes, rocker extensions, and a wing for maximum downforce.
The GS-X gets the carbon brakes and distinct chassis tuning as standard, much like the e-Ray. There is a performance package with the Pilot Sport 4S tires, but there’s no track pack for the hybrid.

Since this is a Grand Sport, it has to also feature the traditional dual hash marks that have been on every GS since 1964. However, since it’s the first example with the engine out back, the hash marks also sit on the rear fenders. The GS models also get unique 10-spoke, forged alloy wheels that will be offered in four different finishes.

The new GS marks the return of the dark admiral blue paint that has marked previous generations, along with Pitch, a dark grey that can be combined with a black over-body stripe and blue hash marks, plus a range of other colors. It’s 2027, which means that Chevrolet needs to offer a special launch edition of the ZR1, which features a Santorini blue interior with red seat belts and other accents. That blue is an awesome color to look at, but if you keep your GS for the long term, it might just be a bit much.

The 2027 Stingray and Grand Sport will hit dealers later this summer, with the Grand Sport X following a few months later. Chevrolet isn’t talking pricing yet, but it would be reasonable to expect it to climb a bit from current prices. Chevrolet does expect that these three LS6-powered models will account for about 70% of Corvette sales, and given the expected performance they’ll offer, that sounds like it might even be low. Now let’s see what GM can do with this new generation V8 in its trucks and SUVs.
Top graphic images: GM









Has anyone mentioned that ALL THIS MAKES LS ENGINE PARTS HARDER TO GET?! They keep doing this crap, it’s not that hard to make a new engine code!
I don’t understand why Chevy felt the need to make the Corvette so tragically ugly.
I usually come around to Corvette styling by the time the Grand Sport comes out, but the C8 still really isn’t doing it for me. Messy, busy detailing and awkward proportions.
So is this the engine for the new Cadillac CT5 Blackwing?
Do they have a manual that can mate up to this engine when in a front-engined sedan?!
If GM were smary, this would be the CT4 Blackwing engine and the high revving DOHC LT6 would go in the CT5 Blackwing
It’s an LS, it’s going to be the new engine for everything.
For good reason.
I’m happy this has been released. Nice power and torque upgrades vs the prior gen.
I hope they manage to increase the reliability for track use.
I also wish they released a manual version. Yeah it’s slower but for sure I won’t buy this without one.
but where can you drive a super car? thick traffic. police. jag off drivers EVERYWHERE. it would be a constant state of frustration. I ll stick with the GTI
Where everyone else drives their Corvette: To Cars & Coffee on Saturday morning.
Many years ago, I had an aftermarket-equipped supercharged Mustang that had been dyno’ed at just over 400 hp, back in the 90’s when that was a lot of hp. It was just frustrating to drive because of everything you mentioned. Now I have a <200 hp Mini Cooper and it’s the most enjoyable car I’ve ever driven. Although I occasionally get stuck behind someone in a 600 hp BMW or Porsche that refuses to go 1 mph over the limit.
There are other letters in the alphabet assholes. Stop reusing the same two.
I mean, they can’t really keep up with tradition. They started with LS, took all those years to go to LT, then it should’ve gone LU, LV, LW, LX, LY, LZ. Now, all but LX have been used for literally anything and everything.
PLus, at this point, would anything really sound any better? GM doesn’t really have a Coyote or Hemi like name to use.
LX6 could be a kinda sweet way to name a new generation of V8’s, IMO.
“The standard engine displacement for small-block Corvettes for more than 20 years has been 6.2 liters” Huh? The 6.2L has been standard since MY2008
I was gonna say, isn’t the LS1 a 5.7?
Correct and then the LS2 was a 6.0 from 2005 through 2007…
Crazy enough, that almost is 20 years now.
Now just make them non-ugly and so you can see out of them again.
exactly. rather have a 917
This Corvette is Best Corvette (actually its not, Best Corvette is 2004 C5 Z06 in PMY)
Will these last longer than the truck 6.2 LTs?
IIRC, only displacement on demand/cylinder deactivation 6.2s had the issue? Which Vettes don’t have.
Benefit of the DCT, it can jump gears for mileage faster than the 10spd auto, and it won’t piss off the driver as much.
The trucks get L87 engines, not LT2. They share a displacement and probably some other parts, but they’re not the same. I haven’t heard any reports that the L87 defects affect LT2s.
CORRRRRRRRRRVETTEEEEEEEEEEEEE
sorry some evil spirits took over my body and compelled me to come over to this post
“The LS6 will live in the Stingray, Grand Sport, and Grand Sport X, with the latter model effectively being a replacement for the e-Ray with its all-wheel-drive hybrid system.”
Hatway? Onay oremay E-Ray? Hatay akesmay emay eryvay adsay.
I find it sadly hilarious that they are killing the E-ray just when there’s a gas price spike. Now it’s true that the Corvette is bought by people who don’t care as much about gas prices, but the fact that this has/is spread/ing throughout the GM lineup is sad.
Someone in reddit just put up a post that the Brightdrop van is now 4-7 times cheaper to operate that the equivalent diesel in many areas of the country.
They are not really killing the E-ray, its just being called the GrandSport X now. Still a widebody with base engine and electric front axle that allows for some amount of EV only mode at low speeds.
so just a rebrand… oh the lulz
Yea basically. At least it gets the newer base engine and newer electric axle to bump power a bit. But yea GM gonna muddy the trims levels and branding, its kinda their thing
People think e-ray is an EV so they need to change the name.
But by killing the E-Ray name, I won’t have an excuse anymore to speak pig latin!
Itsay isay ayay ervay adsay ayday!
The main thing that killed the E-Ray as a stand alone model is the sales numbers (they’re abysmal).
The GS-X is basically the E-Ray + new engine.
Americans can be stubborn. To me at least the E-Ray was a cool option.
so there are going to be lots of “early” 20-26 C8 vettes for sale on the used market next year when their owners trade in for more power?
This engine would be an excellent swap for a base model C6 with a manual transmission. It would get good fuel economy thanks to the aerodynamics of the C6, and in a straight line, blow the doors off of the current bloated pig being sold thanks to losing about 700 lbs.
The Grand Sport is the perfect formula. All the good handling bits from the Z06, but a more tame drivetrain. When I buy a Corvette in a couple of decades, it will be a boomer kept Grand Sport.
Also, I hope that using the X suffix to denote AWD means that the Zora is still coming. The Zora name is too good not to use.
The X suffix is because everyone thought the E-Ray was an EV, instead of hybrid.
I’m referring to the ZR1 getting the E-Ray front axle, resulting in the ZR1X rather than the long-rumored Zora. Now that the X has spread to other Vette models, I’m hoping that means there’s still room for an even crazier Zora model.
Considering the ZR1X has been tuned well north of 1300hp already, it’s entirely possible. It’ll be a few years before something would get released above the ZR1X though to prevent sales cannibalization.
Chevy has done a really good job keeping the C8 fresh. The base C8 was world-breaking, then, as soon as it began to cool, the Z06 was released. Then the ZR1, then ZR1X, and now the Grand Sport. It’s never felt stagnant or old; it still feels like a new product despite having been announced in 2019.
That’s the norm with Halo cars, and the Vette is the only thing GM really cares about beyond the profit margin.
It makes perfect sense if you look at the C8 as a platform instead of a single car.
The problem is, if previous interations of Grand Sports are any indication, the C8 Grand Sport will depreciate less than the regular car and the car above it and eventually basically just cost the same as the car that has the handling bits *and* the hot engine.
This is the best Corvette trim and as an added bonus it replaces the E-ray in its Grand Sport X trim. I loved the E-ray except for its stupid name so this is an absolute win.
The reason is nostalgia.
The original LS6 – i.e. the one that was available in the Chevelle in 1970 – was a monster (in a good way). It was the V-8 that most Chevy performance fans wanted but relatively few could get.
It was also a 454, while this new “LS6” is a 409*. Chevy did make a 409 in the 1960s (the Beach Boys did a song about it) but this bears no real resemblance to that.
* (6.7 liters x 61cid/liter = 408.7 cubic inches)
Are you telling me that song isn’t just about my favorite kitchen and bathroom cleaner?!?!?!
I thought the cleaner was about the song….
Now I’m wondering if all are named for the Toronto expressway….
I know a song named for the Toronto airport so I don’t see whywhyzed not
Gonna be hard for them to pull that off without Neal Peart
They’re trying
Hooray for dual injection. It’s about time.
It was only a matter of time once they figured it out on the ZR1.
The LT5 had it first, but that was pretty niche.
Yes, truly. Also, thank god they didn’t just go for direct injection.
Because muh LS. Not that different to Dodge’s Hemi branding despite the name being almost meaningless as an actual differentiator. Also they’re not even true hemispheres for awhile now, just marketing to boomers.
Also, that red interior is RED. Not my taste per se but always happy to see a manufacturer go all-in like that.
GM seems to alternate between LS and LT designations for their small block v8s, the “LS” engine isn’t even the first LS engine from GM
The LS1 was the first gen3 small block, unless both my memory and wikipedia are wrong.
GM made an LS5 and LS6, the LS6 was the big block 454 that was used in the Chevelle, I had to look it up, so not a small block but it isn’t the first time they have dusted off old engine codes.
Ahh so you were talking explicitly about LS6 as an engine code, not block generations or engine families. Gotcha.
This is the correct answer. LT1 was used in 1970 for a 350 small block. As mentioned, LS5, LS6 were also used in 1970 (low power 454 LS5, high power 454 LS6). the LS and LT is just the internal numbering for Chevy/GM engines. A few years ago you could get the LTG which is was 2.0L Turbo 4 cylinder. I do believe the Chief Engineer (Or someone above them) gets some say in which engine code gets used on a new engine, but basically its just randomly spit out from the GM computers with simple rules like “engine codes start with L”, cant use one that has been used in x number of years…
Don’t forget Cadillac sedans!
As a fellow V8 Cadillac sedan owner, I concur!
By my deeds I honor him, V8
But no MT?
*side eyes tremec*
Someone needs to ask Tremec what the hell they were showing since the GM guy said it was “fake”. I want answers dammit.
I can’t find a place to buy one, so I’m guessing it was a “Hey GM we can totally build one!! You should buy it!!!” exercise.
I wonder if showing the transmission was a play to convince GM to pay for the development. The lack of high torque manual trans-axles kinda makes me think that is would require a really big check to move that development along…
They claimed in the press release that it was developed and ready to go. That’s what I’m assuming is the lie.
It’s probably CAD modeled and that’s about it.
Agreed. This whole manual into a C8 thing is a lot like the v8 into a Wrangler thing. While an aftermarket outfit can hack and slice to get it to fit and work, in order for GM to have it actually pass all the regs it would require a ton of work. They must have saw the writing on the wall back in 2015-2018 (when they were developing the C8) that manuals were just not selling and ran the cost analysis of putting in a manual into a small number of cars and just deemed it not viable. It then allowed the base C8 to be a little cheaper overall. I still wish that had gone through with it though It took decades for Jeep to redesign the Wrangler enough for a v8.
The unfortunate truth is enthusiast vehicles are a dying breed specifically because of us, enthusiast car buyers.
The general public by-and-large wants automatic crossovers that cost nothing to drive, looks fancier than than their neighbor’s vehicle, and removes as much actual driving as possible so they can go back to doom scrolling on their favorite social media app.
The farther you get away from that recipe, the worse it will sell generally speaking. The actual utility of a specific vehicle is about 30% needs and 70% wants, provided the monthly payment is low enough the buyer can technically afford it.
They should take a hint from Porsche and offer a manual version for $10k more and you get big graphics on the side that say “MT”.
But that doesn’t help me because I can’t afford that in a new car, and the manual ones would be the most sought after used vettes out there so they’d still be $110k in 5 years after GM kills it off after 2 model years.
Make them “Stingray GT” and “Z06 GT” to designate the manual trim and charge $25k more and they’d sell every last one
This. Would work.
You’re so very right, and now i’m sad.
I doubt $10k per car would cover the engineering expenses*, given the take rate on manuals**.
*You’d probably have to triple or quadruple that in order to make the bean counters happy.
**It’s one thing to say “I want a manual for my driving pleasure”, and it’s another to say “yep, I’m going to live with fighting that clutch spring that keeps the clutch engaged when 500+ lb ft of torque are going through it.”
**So add a power assist. Problem solved.
Fair point, although while they’re at it they’d probably add in automated rev matching (to save on warranty claims).
At that point is it truly a manual transmission? The mechanical simplicity is gone, and the machine is doing half of the work for you.
But hey I guess you’d still get to shift it yourself, albeit with less efficiency and performance than the automatic would be giving you…
At these horsepower and torque levels, when you insist on a manual, you’re letting ego trump technological advantages. Guess I just don’t see the point.
It’d be a manual transmission as much as human controlled power steering is steering and human controlled power brakes are brakes.
FWIW, the take rate on manuals in certain cars is higher in the US than Europe. IIRC, both Porsche and BMW have said that they have the manual transmission in large part due to the US market.
Given our propensity to do things like voting against our own self interests, that tracks.
I think the V10 M5 was a car that was SMG-only in Europe but they made a manual version specifically for North America.
It changing over time, but for a lot of Brits in their 30’s or older, automatic transmissions are seen as the expensive, slow, ‘lazy person’ option, because that’s what they used to be. Added to the Full vs auto-only driving license issue.
And I agree with them!
I don’t think there were many complaints about a heavy clutch pedal on the ZL1 and Blackwing models with 650+lb/ft. I had an SS with “just” 455 lb/ft and the clutch pedal feel was great. I’m pretty sure they’re all dual disc setups.
They’ll never learn. Always compromising the halo car to sell volume, even though it never sells volume. If you give it a manual, the free airtime from journalists and youtubers doubles or triples, uninterrupted by “if only it had a manual” lamentations, and you get to be the “cool” company for as long as it’s in production. But the product planners absolutely can’t conceptualize a halo product.
All 17 buyers that won’t buy a 2 pedal Vette will be pissed, but from everything I can find there’s zero plans for a 3 pedal. GM has what, 3 vehicles total in USDM available with a stick?
After the two Blackwings, what’s the third car?
Those are it; the Camaro was the third until it went away.
*pours one out*
RIP Camaro
It’ll get brought back as a 4 door EV probably. Just to squeeze every nostalgia dollar out of the name possible.
Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely love my Equinox EV but I don’t want a Camaro EV. There’s other names to bring back that would do the job nicely
Absolutely. There’s a ton of nameplates that would be way better, but they’re all nameplates older than the entire marketing division. Camaro is the only nameplate with any draw to sub 50 year olds. Same reason and methodology behind the Mustang Mockery I mean Mach-E.
Watch them name it the CamEro and think they’re being clever.
Oh God, it’s definitely going to be called the CamEro
Buick Electra was RIGHT THERE.
You’re right, there’s only 2. My mistake. Just proves my point further: that it ain’t gonna happen.
The Tremec 6spd transaxle is out there if someone wanted a 3 pedal C8 bad enough. I still haven’t seen one actually get built.
From another article: