Home » China Is The Reason Why You’re Not Paying More For Gasoline

China Is The Reason Why You’re Not Paying More For Gasoline

Tmd China Gas Ts

While gas prices have risen a lot since the beginning of the year, they haven’t reached the apocalyptic heights many were originally predicting. That’s the way the market has been lately. At the end of last year, some analysts were worried oil prices would fall to $50 a barrel. That didn’t happen, either. What’s going on?

The answer to why the cost of a barrel of oil has stayed within a reasonable bound is China. For reasons only known to itself, the country has been quietly keeping the price of oil stable. This is at the same time that the country is exporting cars and trying to keep control of precious metals.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Another mystery involving China is why Volvo is allowed to build more cars here while Polestar is getting the boot. I’ve got a theory I’ve espoused in The Morning Dump before, and there’s now a little more evidence in that direction. There’s no conspiracy theory needed to explain Toyota’s success as it continues to benefit from a weak yen.

Car Week is nigh, and Lamborghini is celebrating the Miura in a big way. Or, well, celebrating in a way.

China As The Stabilizer Of Global Oil Prices

Brent Oil Prices
Screenshot: Google Finance

Above is a chart of Brent Crude Oil Last Day Financial Futures, which is a good enough measure for where prices are for global oil. Also, when I say the “you” in this post, I’m referring to a global “you” and not a specifically American one because this is a global story (a chart of WTI Crude shows a similar pattern, if you’re curious). An American is a little more sheltered whereas, say, an Australian is way more at risk from fluctuations in global oil prices.

I’m not an expert in the economics of petroleum, but I was born in the shadow of refineries and grew up in Houston, which is close enough for this discussion. Like many people, I assumed fuel prices were going to get a lot worse than they did after the coordinated US-Israeli strike on Iran and the subsequent closing of the Strait of Hormuz. This was after a long period where it seemed like fuel prices could only go down.

Early on, I listened to a podcast wherein commodity market expert Rory Johnston talked about how the price of oil could surge above $200 a barrel. That didn’t happen, and he came back later to describe where everyone went wrong in making that assumption (link here if the video doesn’t load for you):

Here’s what he said:

We always knew that China had huge stockpiles of oil, but we didn’t know how they were going to react to this crisis. And what we’ve seen through this crisis is that Chinese oil imports, crude oil imports into China, the world’s largest crude oil importer, fell by upwards of five million barrels a day between the three month average prior to the war through to June. Now we’re not quite done this month, but that’s roughly where we’re trending for June so far. That five million barrels a day was upwards of half of the total spot market supply hit to Asia, and that allowed a lot of those other Asian importers to basically not have the competition that they would have had for the barrels they were importing.

When prices of oil dropped in 2025, China did oil-producing countries a solid by stockpiling millions and millions of barrels of oil. When prices shot up, China basically stopped competing for oil on the open market and allowed more desperate countries with smaller stockpiles to catch up at a more reasonable prices.

This is weird! China is super competitive in so many ways, so what’s going on? I’m not an oil expert, but Philip Verleger is, so let’s ask him:

China likely reacted to maintain higher prices in 2025, preserve its export markets to oil-exporting countries, and maintain competition in the oil market. The latter countries purchased $320 billion in goods and services from China in 2023, the most recent data available. Chinese officials likely worried that their Middle East export market would suffer if oil prices declined precipitously. Buying oil for its strategic reserves helped keep prices up.

In 2026, China has cut its oil consumption sharply and drawn from its reserves to hold prices lower. The Chinese government understands that the country’s exports could fall if oil prices shot up and global activity decreased, as the IMF predicted in April 2026.

Many will challenge the idea of China acting as buffer stock manager in the oil market to further its economic interests. However, the evidence shows that China is consistently aggressive when it comes to boosting its economy, particularly regarding commodity markets.

It’s good to be friends with China, and hard to be competitor. As Verleger points out, China was happy to dump products on the rare earth market to make it harder for others to compete, especially the United States. China, though, seems to want its partners in the Middle East to stay in business and its consumers in the rest of the world to have the funds to import what it exports.

The minerals thing is interesting, as the Trump Administration hoped to stockpile about $300 million in lithium carbonate reserves for strategic defense reasons. After extending the deadline multiple times the Department of Defense canceled the contract. That’s kind of weird, right?

Volvo Will Make More XC60s In South Carolina

Volvo South Carolina Plant
Photo: Volvo

The United States effectively banned Polestar, the Chinese-owned automaker, from selling any cars after MY 2026. What it didn’t do, though, was ban Volvo, even though Volvo has essentially the same ownership structure and sells many of the same vehicles.

In fact, the new Volvo EX60 looks a lot like a Polestar 3, and there are similarities between various Geely, Polestar, Zeekr, and Polestar products. These cars do have some differences when it comes to telematics, infotainment, et cetera, and it seems like Volvo may have convinced regulators that the company’s American offerings were safe enough from the kind of surveillance and interference at the center of this whole issue.

So why couldn’t Polestar do the same? I had a theory, and it went like this:

Polestar makes a fraction of the cars that Volvo does. Given the difficulties Polestar has had in the market and other changes, it feels entirely possible that Geely could have made a deal at the top to fully utilize the South Carolina facility (thus pleasing the President and Republican politicians), resulting in a game of musical chairs where Polestar was left without a seat.

Oh, hey, here’s an update from Automotive News:

Production of the XC60, slated to begin in January, initially will boost output by more than two-thirds at the troubled Ridgeville assembly plant near Charleston.

“We are producing around 30,000 cars and [XC60] will bring at least another 20,000 to start with,” Volvo Cars Americas President Luis Rezende told Automotive News.

“It’s going to be at least a full shift, and it’s a fantastic preparation for what is coming next. Charleston will be very, very busy.”

The one thing that the Charleston plant has never been is very, very busy. It has been, per the article, operating at about 15% or so lately as it builds the Polestar 3 and Volvo Ex90. Making a bunch of XC60s there is sensible, as the model is a popular offering and has seen sales rise so far this year in the United States. Having more production in South Carolina will likely allow the company to take the XC60 and be more competitive on price.

However, the timing does feel like it supports my conspiracy theory that this is all a plan to save Volvo by bringing more jobs to South Carolina.

Toyota Is Banking On That Cheap Yen

Akio Toyoda Honored 600x391
Photo: Toyota

In my article on currency last week, I said you could look at The Fast and the Furious as a movie about the strength of the US Dollar or, inversely, as a movie about the weakness of the Japanese yen.

Guess what? The yen is weak again, and this is good news for Toyota, aNikkei Asia reports:

Toyota also raised its net revenue forecast by 3 trillion yen and its operating profit outlook by 400 billion yen. It now expects net revenue of 54 trillion yen, up 6.5% from the previous fiscal year, and operating profit of 3.4 trillion yen, down 9.7%.

[…]

Toyota cited revised foreign exchange assumptions in the current fiscal year as among factors contributing to the upward revision of 480 billion yen ($3 billion) to its operating profit forecast.

It amended its expectation for the Japanese currency in relation to the dollar to a rate of 160 yen per greenback from the previous 150 yen made at the start of the fiscal year. Regarding the euro, it now assumes a rate of 181 yen to the single currency from the previous 180 yen. For Toyota, a one-yen depreciation against the dollar lifts operating profit by 50 billion yen, while a similar weakening against the euro leads to an increase of 10 billion yen.

Not that everything is perfect at Toyota. There are still large fundamental issues with Chinese demand and supply issues related to the Middle East it has to work out. At the same time, the company is still recovering from a massive earthquake in Japan. Japan’s currency, though, is at least one factor breaking Toyota’s way.

What Do We Think Of The Lamborghini Revuelto Miura 60° Homage?

Lamborghini Revuelto Miura 60° Homage
Photo: Lamborghini

I truly adore the Lamborghini Miura and the 60th anniversary of the model’s debut is Lamborghini’s excuse to bring a bunch of them to Car Week next week. That’ll be incredible. I can’t wait.

While I haven’t driven the new Lamborghini Revuelto I’m sure it’s great, and people I know who have had the chance say great things about it. Lamborghini is taking the Revuelto and giving it a Miura-like tribute, which includes:

The exterior configuration of the Revuelto Miura 60° Homage features two dedicated liveries, inspired by classic styling characteristics found on many historic Miuras: lower body sections finished in a contrasting color to the main bodywork. Customers can choose between the Oro Elios livery paired with Altanero Shiny Gold wheels, or the Grigio Nimbus livery combined with Altanero Matt Titanium Diamond wheels. Both configurations celebrate color combinations that helped establish the Miura as an automotive icon.

The exterior design is completed by the dedicated Miura 60 logo, positioned above the Revuelto script on the side sill near the rear wheel arch, together with a gloss black Lamborghini rear logo, recalling one of the distinctive styling details of the original Miura. Complementing this color scheme, the Revuelto Miura 60° Homage features gloss black brake calipers and matte black exhaust tailpipes.

Neat, I guess? Is that enough to count as a tribute? Is there anything else the company could have done? I guess I’ll have to wait until I see it.

What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD

I’ve been listening to The Lonely Island and Seth Meyers Podcast, and they made an interesting point in an episode recently about the “I’m on a Boat” song. They made the point that the joke works as a song, but once you see the video it’s just that much funnier. It’s true. You gotta see the shorts.

The Big Question

What’s the best tribute car? What’s the worst?

Top graphic images: DepositPhotos.com

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
Member
Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
6 minutes ago

Best tribute car? It’s gotta be the 2005 Ford GT right?

Live2ski
Member
Live2ski
23 minutes ago

Do you know what came out before “I’m on a Boat’. maybe the inspiration??

Step Brother’s Prestige World Wide: Boats & Hoes video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzw7xHrZbak

Sackofcheese
Sackofcheese
2 minutes ago
Reply to  Live2ski

Accidently sang that in the office the other day when my coworkers were trying to figure out Columbus’s 3rd boat name. Got a laugh from the interns.

Datanerd
Datanerd
23 minutes ago

At some point the Peoples Liberation Army will start to get antsy about the depletion of reserves and insist that China start buying. Quite frankly, I expect that in late August or September.

Roofless
Member
Roofless
24 minutes ago

China’s grown to the point where the stability of the world economy overall is valuable to them and they’ve also got the size and capacity to actually act to ensure it. That used to be us.

My bet on this is they’ll keep oil prices sufficiently high to continue to drive investment in renewables, because that’s where their actual long term bet is, but not so high as to cause a proper recession, because that’s bad for business and the CCP doesn’t like chaos. As a person, this is better for me than whatever the fuck the US gov’t is trying to do; as an American, boy, that’s pretty much the game wrapped up for us, isn’t it?

Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
Member
Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
2 minutes ago
Reply to  Roofless

as an American, boy, that’s pretty much the game wrapped up for us, isn’t it?

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. If China is the one stabilizing and tempering the world economy from the US and its shaved orangutan for a president, that’s a huge paradigm shift.

Mighty Bagel
Member
Mighty Bagel
27 minutes ago

Worst: Nissan Rouge: Rogue One Edition
Runner Up: Hyundai Tucson: Walking Dead Edition

Sackofcheese
Sackofcheese
4 minutes ago
Reply to  Mighty Bagel

Second Runner Ups: Jeep Call of Duty Editions

Toecutter
Member
Toecutter
36 minutes ago

Reserves will only last for so long. If the shut down in the straight continues long enough, the oil prices will become “apocalyptic”. Another 6 months should do the trick. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve in the USA is already low. Get yourself an EV while you still can. For many, even an ebike will do. The availability of liquid fuels is not something that should be taken for granted when madman have been at the helm of world affairs for multiple generations.

Stockpiling food would also be a good idea to help offset the price increase we will be seeing soon, which will be the result of fewer crops planted this year due to fertilizer not reaching farmers in time due to the shuit down of the Straight of Hormuz. If things get truly apocalpyitic, there may not be any food to buy at any price. The Petrodollar has been on borrowed time after all, much like most of the world’s fiat currencies which have nothing backing them other than the faith that they have value.

Angry Bob
Member
Angry Bob
32 minutes ago
Reply to  Toecutter

The U.S. overproduces food, in part so there’s a buffer for things like this. Nobody is going to starve.

Toecutter
Member
Toecutter
26 minutes ago
Reply to  Angry Bob

Plenty of working people going hungry in this country already, skipping meals out of financial necessity. Further, a large percentage of it is wasted(nevermind that most of the food here isn’t actually food). And even then, grocery stores lock their dumpsters to prevent the less fortunate or even just the frugal from getting anything for free.

Alexk98
Member
Alexk98
21 seconds ago
Reply to  Toecutter

I think it’s important to differentiate between a lack of affordability of food and lack of availability of food to be purchased. Food waste is very much a real thing in the US, but dumpsters being locked has several valid reasons, both for food safety/public health and for employee and customer safety. Many grocery stores and restaurants do have donation programs for unsellable but not unsafe to consume foods.

Roofless
Member
Roofless
28 minutes ago
Reply to  Toecutter

A fun fact about the US strategic petroleum reserve is that if it dips below 250M barrels, we begin doing actual damage to the infrastructure that holds it.

RidesBicyclesButLovesCars
Member
RidesBicyclesButLovesCars
4 minutes ago
Reply to  Roofless

I have seen estimates ranging from 70M to 300M barrels before the structural damage starts to happen.

The bottom line is that the SPR is a collection of salt caverns that have been operated as a market buffer for economic and political reasons instead of the “break in case of emergency” scenario it was designed for. We have been using the SPR outside of it’s design intent for decades and no one really knows what damage that has caused and when things start to fail.

I’m sure there are oil guys who are making plans on how to continue to extract oil once structural failure does happen. However, the withdrawal rate will be much slower if they figure something out.

RidesBicyclesButLovesCars
Member
RidesBicyclesButLovesCars
22 minutes ago
Reply to  Toecutter

I doubt we get nationwide fuel shortages in the USA/Canada. The higher prices that are inevitable will reduce demand enough that we will be OK. I think we do run the risk of short-term, regional shortages because our refineries are running near their max capacity. One little hiccup (or Gulf of Mexico hurricane) that disrupts a refinery will have an immediate impact once we run our buffer inventories down to the minimum operational levels.

JDE
JDE
47 minutes ago

Lambo is less Miura than say a new Corvette to me. but I would still probably drive it.

James McHenry
Member
James McHenry
47 minutes ago

TBQ: best? Hm. In terms of tape and stripe packages, the 30th anniversary Camaro SS with the white and orange always looked good. Going all in? ’05-’06 Ford GT.

Worst, at least on the going all in front, is probably the retro Thunderbird, but there’s probably way worse and more lazy when it comes to the paint/stripes.

Logan
Logan
52 minutes ago

wait I thought we were fighting for energy independence

V10omous
Member
V10omous
54 minutes ago

For reasons only known to itself, the country has been quietly keeping the price of oil stable.

The problem with this of course is that China now holds the world economy hostage as much or more than Iran does. What they do with that leverage is uncertain but unlikely to be good.

Dalton
Member
Dalton
20 minutes ago
Reply to  V10omous

Sinophobia is so normalized people just type this shit out and don’t think they look like a crazy person.

Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
Member
Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
11 minutes ago
Reply to  Dalton

No one alive has been in a world where the US and Western Europe aren’t the main economic and cultural superpowers. It’s clear that China is emerging as the stable and strongest world superpower especially with current Western leadership.

Uncertainty is the root of fear. This fear is unfortunately going to get worse before it gets better

Last edited 10 minutes ago by Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
SNL-LOL Jr
Member
SNL-LOL Jr
7 minutes ago
Reply to  Dalton

When the building in Manhattan had two columns start buckling, my mother-in-law almost, by reflex, blamed it on Chinese steel.

She is quite well educated but she has little knowledge on material properties, metallurgy, and structural engineering.

That said, a building from 1960 likely was not built with Chinese steel. (Source: we are familiar with the building but are not involved in the conversion.)

It shall be no surprise that she also, with zero evidence, blamed Chinese rebars shortly after the Surfside collapse.

Last edited 5 minutes ago by SNL-LOL Jr
Alexk98
Member
Alexk98
6 minutes ago
Reply to  Dalton

There are myriad valid reasons to be concerned, skeptical, and aware of the things the CCP is doing to gain influence on the world stage. It is not at all unfair to criticize China for it’s lax stance on Intellectual property, human rights, and the countries it chooses for allies such as Russia and North Korea, not to mention it’s territorial disputes with neighbor states and it’s encroachment on Taiwan’s sovereignty.

My Other Car is a Tetanus Shot
Member
My Other Car is a Tetanus Shot
6 minutes ago
Reply to  V10omous

Geopolitics 101: Every country acts in its own perceived interests. Especially so for superpowers. This seems fairly obvious, no?

The world we inhabit is a function of a particular design of a superpower in the post-WWII era. I’m happy to be on the winning side certainly, but I’m well aware of the why and for whose benefit this occurred.

If the decision-making at the top echelon of this global order is becoming more erratic, strategically positioning oneself as an alternative stable and rational operator (whether actual or perceived) in an increasingly non-Western world would seem to be a strategically wise decision.

I expect the People’s Republic of China is attempting to set up itself strategically going further into the 21st century.

Perhaps the Western world should heed the warning.

24
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x