Home » Everyone Is Wrong About The NC Miata But Me

Everyone Is Wrong About The NC Miata But Me

Nc Miata Take

It seems like every long-produced car has a generation that is detested by enthusiasts and owners alike. You have the 7th gen Civic with its rampant transmission issues, the C3 Corvette with its wimpy power figures, and the humble, horribly misunderstood NC Miata. I have never truly comprehended why the NC was so universally disliked online. I had one as a daily driver for years after buying it new in 2015. I started modifying it in 2019, and continued to daily drive it until I upscaled to my Mazda3 Hatchback in 2023. To this day, nothing I have owned has fully lived up to that happy little roadster.

The third generation, or NC MX-5 Miata, was produced by Mazda from 2006 until 2015. Prior to the ND, or 4th generation, its nine-year lifecycle was the longest production run of any generation of Miata since the nameplate’s creation in 1989.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

More notably, the NC was also the first generation of Miata to squeeze a 2.0-liter engine under the hood. They still didn’t make a significant amount of power–in the low 170s at best–but in a car as light as a Miata it’s really all you need. Also, if we’re going purely on technicality, the NC and ND are not “Miatas.” They are merely “MX-5s” as Mazda dropped the “Miata” name with the introduction of the NC (Sorry, Mercedes).

What’s In A Name?

A gridded image comparing the Mazda Ibuki Concept car to the production NC Miata
Top: The Mazda Ibuki Concept. Bottom: The 2006 Production NC Miata. Image Source: Mazda Newsroom

When the Mazda Ibuki Concept was shown at the 2003 Tokyo Auto Show, attendees and journalists alike immediately noted that it was most likely a sign of what’s to come for the world’s best-selling sports car–and they were partially right. The concept, as they often do, differed significantly from the production NC that was unveiled a couple of years later.

The Ibuki concept had a wheelbase that was nearly a foot shorter than the NB’s, made 10 more horsepower from a teeny 1.6L engine, and incorporated cool gadgets and gizmos like in-seat AC vents. With the production NC varying so heavily in such significant ways, like being noticeably larger and heavier with a disappointing lack of the aforementioned seat vents, you would imagine the press would have torn it apart, but they didn’t. They absolutely loved it.

Motorweek praised its “motorcycle-quick” steering. Edmunds praised its comfy interior dubbing it “an ideal companion for spontaneous adventures.” Car and Driver even called driving the 2006 NC Miata a “joyous experience that verges on religious.” Despite all of the initial praise the new Miata received, it was on the receiving end of a significant amount of hatred by passionate Miata and car enthusiasts alike online.

While the NC Miata is, generally speaking, more positively viewed in 2026, it’s still pretty widely disliked. As a resident automotive Facebook group lurker, I asked about 60,000 people across a handful of Miata-specific and general car interest groups to see what specifically the most common gripes were. To no surprise, the complaints could generally be broken down into three general points:

  • It’s too heavy and slow.
  • It’s ugly.
  • It’s a bad Miata.

‘It’s Too Heavy And Slow’

Nc Miata Red
Photo: Mazda

Despite this being the most common gripe towards NC Miatas, the nameplate is largely known for two things: being lightweight and low power. After all, the 1990 USDM Miata weighed just over 2,100 lbs and made a piddly 116 horsepower. This combination of qualities, along with its perfect 50/50 weight distribution and well-tuned factory suspension, meant that even at the absolute limit of power, any amateur driver with two brain cells to rub together could easily (and relatively safely) drive the car down a twisty road with no other emotion than absolute glee.

The NC weighs a minimum of 2,450 lbs depending on trim, which is the equivalent of an NA with a refrigerator (weighing 350 lbs) somehow strapped to it. That much of a weight difference might seem extreme, but over the same time period the Honda Civic Si bloated from about 2,300 lbs all the way up to almost 2,900 lbs for a 600-lb gain. The Ford Mustang went from 2,800 lbs to almost 3,400 lbs. Cars, in general, tend to get heavier as time crawls forward thanks to things like size preference and safety regulations, not because of laziness or poor skill on some poor chassis designer’s part.

Official spec sheets released by Mazda only state a 24-lb difference between the equivalent trims of the 2004 NB and 2006 NC, meaning the weight jump from NA to NB is far greater than the jump from NB to NC. The bare frame of the NC Miata is a whole 3.5 lbs lighter than its predecessor, all while increasing its torsional rigidity by an astounding 47%. The engine, despite being higher displacement, is a wonderful 42 lbs lighter than the standard, naturally aspirated engine in the NB. Even at its heaviest trims, the NC weighs 31 lbs less than the turbocharged 2004 Mazdaspeed Miata and makes only 8 fewer horsepower.

The Mazdaspeed Miata (MSM) is lauded as being the best Miata for speed lovers. It produces 26 lb-ft more torque than the NC, making it feel punchy but still light on its feet. Upon its release in 2004, MotorTrend even called it “A Miata with Muscle.” However, the NC is still objectively faster, with the 2006 GT earning a 0.3 seconds faster 0-60mph time and quarter mile than the 2004 MSM, according to Zeroto60times.com.

The NC also sports a very slightly better power-to-weight ratio and higher redline of 6,700 rpm which gets even higher depending on model year and trim. My 2015 Club trim had a 7,200rpm redline–and trust me, I loved using every bit of it.

‘It’s Ugly’

Aesthetics are one of the most subjective things out there. People, now more than ever, build their entire personalities around their preferred aesthetic. From the quarter zip-loving finance bros and pink pilates princesses to the studded belt donning alt baddies and their Sylvia Plath loving, matcha-drinking “performative male” counterparts–the human species is one ultimately guided by things our eyes like looking at. Our cars are no exception.

Mazda is no stranger to making beautiful cars. The current elegance of its Kodo design era, all the way back to the striking lines of the 787B Group C race car, and the almost European simplicity of the NA Miata, gave the manufacturer a reputation of making cars that are effectively motorized pieces of art. However in the mid-2000s the company was in an awkward teenage phase, with their cars bearing big toothy grins, cat-eye-shaped headlights, and plenty of matte black plastic in their interiors. The NC Miata was not saved from this fate, with its first release being outfitted with a catfish mouth-shaped grille and blobby oval headlights. The first facelift gave the NC2 its signature goofy grin.

A graphic comparing each sub generation of NC Miatas

The styling decisions that led to the NC1 looking… like that are unknown, but the car still was undoubtedly in line with Mazda’s overarching design language at the time. Cars of the early 2000s, in general, were becoming more organically shaped, with smooth curved lines and rounder motifs that are in stark contrast to the modern taste of automotive designers adding body creases in places just seemingly for the hell of it.

These rounder lines did, sadly, seem to visually emphasize the NC Miata’s relative largess compared to its predecessor. It was half an inch higher off the ground, an inch taller and wider, and had almost two inches added to its wheelbase and length. That may not seem like a lot, but when the car is basically the size of a shoebox those small increases are immediately noticeable. The last facelift of the NC, the NC3, is widely regarded as the best looking and the most aggressively styled. The entire aesthetic of the car was sharpened just enough to be distinguishable to the trained eye from the NC2, and in my opinion, enough to make its otherwise blobby profile look less like a benign growth and a lot more intentional.

I’m not going to sit here and try and pitch the NC Miata as one of the best looking cars on the planet because frankly–it isn’t. But it’s very, very far from the worst looking and I think we as a collective need to be more accepting of things that simply look average.

‘It’s A Bad Miata’

Mazda Mx 5 Gt Race Car Large
Photo: Mazda

If I were being a pedant, I would say “Correct! It’s technically not a Miata, it’s an MX-5.” But the mere technicality of what’s on the nameplate doesn’t detract from the fact that many of the words journalists used to describe the very first Miata back in 1989 (via pre-release drives) were used to describe the NC when it was the new kid on the block. An original Car And Driver review of the 1990 Miata complimented its open, roomy cockpit, simple gauge cluster, shockingly high redline, its artfully crafted suspension and direct, analog driving feel.

When I test drove the NC that I eventually purchased in 2015, all of those sentiments carried over. In fact, I was only purchasing an NC because my NA sadly had to be laid to rest after developing a gnarly crack in its engine block. I test drove an ND since they had the 2016s on the lot at the time, and it felt almost robotic in comparison to the NA that I so deeply loved. It was closer in size than the NC, sure, but it felt too modernized. Its throttle felt oddly detached from its engine response, and the fully electronic power steering was almost arcade-like when

I compared it to the NC’s hybrid electronic-hydraulic power steering. The current and third iteration of ND has solved these issues, but back in 2015 they were too glaring to ignore. When it came down to it I ultimately picked what felt most like the NA Miata that I limped over to my local Mazda dealership that day–and that was the NC.

Driving dynamics aside, many of the complaints about the NC being a “bad Miata” are tied to its weight and size, but as I’ve outlined earlier in this rambling of a madwoman masquerading as a thought piece, they’re exaggerated. In my aforementioned polling of some groups on Facebook, a very common sentiment was that people hated NC Miatas and thought they were the worst of the now four generations until they drove one, whether in a stock or modified form. As soon as they got behind the wheel, the friendly little NC became a favorite.

The Reality of NC Ownership

Outside of being vastly underrated for its driving experience and looks, the NC Miata is generally speaking a fantastic option for a daily driver, weekend car, autocross build, track car, or really any other purpose you can dream up. It also has the most cargo room out of any of the other 3 generations of Miata, so you could even take one to Costco for your monthly large scale impulse buys and paper towel restocks. They Say M.I.A.T.A (Miata Is Always The Answer) for a reason, and the NC is no exception.

Its near lifelong stint being the most universally hated Miata generation has largely saved it from the “Miata Tax” that has caused NA and NB values to skyrocket in recent years. For the same cost as a relatively stock or tastefully modified, well maintained NA you can get a car that’s 20 years newer with a nicer interior, more trunk space, more power, and is more reliable with less effort. The price ranges for recently sold NA & NC Miatas are very close to one another, so if you have $15,000 to spend on a Miata you have a pretty wide range of options.

Two graphs depicting historical sales data of NC (top) and NA (bottom) Miatas on BringATrailer.com
Historical sales data of NC and NA Miatas on BringATrailer.com

Personalizing your bargain sports car will prove to not be an issue either–as their popularity in track driving communities means NCs have incredible aftermarket support. They were also in production for almost a decade, so sourcing OEM parts for them is incredibly easy and if you want to shell out the cash, Mazda will even still sell you a pretty good chunk of their original parts catalog. And if you feel like being crafty, they were built on what is essentially a shortened RX-8 chassis platform, so a lot of RX-8 parts serve as OEM+ functional upgrades for NCs.

My personal favorite upgrades were RX-8 sway bars, which offered about a 25% increase in thickness to the NC’s stock sways, and the intermittent windshield wiper switch. If you’re feeling especially chaotic, there is even wide aftermarket support for swapping in a Duratec 2.5L engine that can output close to 300 horsepower with a tune and turbo added.

I think, collectively, the car community owes the NC Miata an apology. For years it was ruthlessly ridiculed for being bloated, ugly, slow, and just generally bad–but it has always been just incredibly misunderstood. Recently the tides have started to shift, as more and more people get their hands on them in the affordable used market and realize how amazing they really are. Sure, an increase in desirability may make prices jump up eventually, but until then, NCs will be the comfortable, affordable, smiling underdog of the Miata family.

Top photo: Author

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shifty McShifterson
Shifty McShifterson
3 days ago

I too rise in defense of the NC. My brother has a deep red hardtop manual, and it makes him happy as a clam.

Zipn Zipn
Member
Zipn Zipn
3 days ago

I’ve had NAs both stock and with a Jackson Racing super-charger/go-fast bits, NBs both NA stock, and factory turbo (Mazda-Speed Miata) with and with extra go-fast bits added (thanks Flyin’Miata!), and a couple of years ago I picked up a MINT 2010 NC PRHT GT (Power-Retractable Hard Top). The NC was great stock, but after a test drive in a Fab-9 turbo’d NC I just had to get one. Took a few weekends to install, but my 2010 NC was wicked fast with the Garret turbo added (kudo’s to Fab-9 for an excellent after-market kit). I’ve driven most every one of the 7 I’ve had on a track at some point and learned what worked and what needed a little help.

Hands-Down the 2010 NC Power Retractable Hard Top NC GT with the sweet as ever 6-speed was a fantastic Miata. Worth noting the 2010s+ have stronger internals, and though the suspension feels like it’s soft compared to NAs and NB, it adds to the fun when thrashing the car around the track. Stock or with the extra 100hp turbo kit it is plenty quick.

Of Note: The NCs were the first generation to get side air bags (something to think about if you ever get t-boned!) – and the ONLY generation with the trick power retractable hard top. Quite frankly, it’s fantastic and it was a real let down when they went to the new design for the NDs. I much prefer the NC’s top if you need/want the security of the power hard top.

It wasn’t perfect, but close enough (no spare came standard, though easy to find one to squeeze into the surprising large trunk). The stock BOSE stereo was pretty pathetic too and certainly not up-to-date.

The NC’s overall extra size fit well and is a plus, not a bad thing (After getting one of my NAs, when I asked her how she liked driving it, my daughter coined the phrase “You don’t drive a Miata; you WEAR it!” making me a very proud Daddy!

The NC may not be a better Miata, but it’s a better car!

If my stable was large enough I’d still have all 7 of my Miatas . I miss them but I still have my 91 NA BRG SE (5 spd) under cover waiting for me. Make the hole big enough you can bury me in it.

Last edited 3 days ago by Zipn Zipn
3WiperB
Member
3WiperB
3 days ago

I have the “worst of the worst” Miata. A 2006 NC1. And yet, it’s the car that makes me drive to the office when I could be working from home. It’s the car that, after about 2 months of being stored for the winter, I crave to drive like I need a fix. Most people who hate on the NC haven’t ever driven one.

We have an ND1 too and it’s great, but I would pick the NC every time. It’s bigger and more comfortable on the inside, the steering feel is perfect, and it’s just a little rougher around the edges than the ND in a way that makes it more engaging. It’s also just a dependable, reliable car. Just like the MGB, you can have a ton of fun without breaking laws, but the Miata starts every time and doesn’t give me any trouble.

Ppnw
Member
Ppnw
3 days ago

You hit on all the points that make the NC great. It’s the 996 of the Miata world. The people who don’t like it have never driven it.

A late NC3 Club with the right wheels/offset and more aggressive suspension is an epic looking car. The RX-8 style wheel arches really make the design come alive with the right stance.

Since we’re being pedantic, “Miata” name returned with the ND. It doesn’t say Miata anywhere on the car, but at least in the US, it gets marketed as “MX-5 Miata” in all materials and on the website. For the US market, the NC is the only Miata that wasn’t a Miata.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
3 days ago

Lets rank MX-5s the way others rank Bond/007 movies – Worst to best – Shall we?

  • ND RF (the current Retactable Fastback)
  • NC PRHT (previous gen Power Retractable Hardtop)
  • ND
  • Fiat 124 Spider
  • NB
  • NC
  • Abarth 124 Spider
  • NB Mazdaspeed
  • NA
Ppnw
Member
Ppnw
3 days ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Your ranking could be reversed and I’d agree with it more. Is this really worst to best?

The Fiat is an ugly duckling and doesn’t deserve to be included in any Miata ranking, IMO.

Zipn Zipn
Member
Zipn Zipn
2 days ago
Reply to  Ppnw

Everyone calls the Mazda/Fiat 124 Spider the Fiata. I think MaFia is a better choice 🙂

Joke #119!
Joke #119!
3 days ago

This seems more like an Insta post than a The Autopian post.
Or, maybe a “Stop picking on Britney!” post. (I will, when she stops getting DUI’s.)

Anonymous Person
Anonymous Person
3 days ago

Everyone Is Wrong About The NC Miata But Me
I can’t be wrong about it. I didn’t even know Mazda made a North Carolina Miata.

Oh wait, it’s not a North Carolina Miata?

I guess I was wrong. But for a different reason.

Rad Barchetta
Member
Rad Barchetta
3 days ago

My first Miata was an NC2. I didn’t like the grin when it was unveiled, but when I test drove that car for the time, I no longer cared. It was love at first drive. Eventually, I learned to appreciate the grin as a reflection of the expression on the driver’s face. We had so many adventures together. Track, autocross, TotD, Route 66 with Dad…

I’m on my fourth Miata now, an ND2 RF. But I still miss that NC.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
3 days ago

I bought my 2001 NB in 2007. I did not love the looks of the NC, plus they were still new (and more $). People were still talking trash about the NBs back then so the prices were low.

In the end, there is no bad Miata. I wanted the NB because I was going to use it as a road trip car, and did. It has done a couple of Boston – Miami round trips and I drove it to Boston from LA when I bought it. I’ve taken it on several 500+ mile day trips along the way.

The common forum talk back then was that the NB was a better car, but the NA was the better Miata.

Buy whatever Miata suits your budget. There is no wrong choice.

Ppnw
Member
Ppnw
3 days ago
Reply to  Anoos

Exactly right – and it’s kind of amazing that this statement holds true over 35 years for a company like Mazda.

Each generation has its own set of compromises driven by whatever situation Mazda was in at the time. But crucially, Mazda always got the compromises right. Every Miata feels like a Miata, and they have all been brilliant.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
2 days ago
Reply to  Ppnw

I agree entirely. I was worried that the NC was a sign of things to come, but Mazda came back with the ND.

I was surprised to see that the weight jump from the NA to NB is larger than the jump from NB to NC. The NC looks heavier than it is (kind of Audi TT-ish).

JCat
Member
JCat
3 days ago

I passed an NC on my commute today, and I felt an immense amount of desire to start doomscrolling marketplace for one. They’re my favorite Miata by far.

Zipn Zipn
Member
Zipn Zipn
3 days ago
Reply to  JCat

Whatever you do, don’t go to Autotempest.com.

You’ll find yourself FINDING the exact car you want. It’s the most dangerous site on the web for car enthusiast
…. (Search all the cars for sale that match a a 2010 – 2016 Mazda MX-5 manual transmission + power hard top with less than 60,000 miles under $18,000 within 300 miles of zip code)…

1 hour later:
“Honey, want to take a road trip???”

Phuzz
Member
Phuzz
3 days ago
Reply to  JCat

A couple of months ago, when Mercedes posted about buying her wife’s Miata, I thought “hmm, I wonder how affordable they are”, and within five minutes of looking on ebay, I found an NC, with the power hardtop, at that point sitting at less than £2k, and it was not far away from me.
I needed to replace my current daily, and I was planning to get something sensible but I ended up with a bright red MX-5 and couldn’t be happier.
(Actually, I’d be happier if I could afford to put petrol in it rn, but the car is great)

tl/dr start doomscrolling now, and you’ll have a fun car ready for the summer before you know it 😉

Rod Millington
Rod Millington
3 days ago

I had no real issues with the NC MX5 beyond all the ones I saw that had the retracting hard top and an automatic. They seemed to be missing the point.

The current ND3 is the best MX5.

Michael Fortenbery
Michael Fortenbery
3 days ago
Reply to  Rod Millington

We have a NC2 PRHT Auto(!) in Copper Red Mica, which is probably far down the list of best Miatas, but it’s still really engaging to drive. There’s really no BAD Miata. Everybody should own a Miata at some point.

Cerberus
Member
Cerberus
3 days ago

I’m not a Miata person, but the NC1 is probably the one I’d want. I hate the Joker smile, even more so with the stupid half-blank “bumper beam” in the grille of the NC3, like teenage Joker wearing braces. I think I might like Lexus’ terrible spindle grille more than what Mazda adopted (and seeing how they dropped it rather quickly, I’d say I wasn’t the only one who hated it). ND is OK, but it has squinty headlights that don’t quite seem to fit, like the car was made by a boutique company that had to use someone else’s lighting and their first choice became unavailable after the design had been finalized. Then there’s the F-Type wannabe tail lights that look too large and contrived for the small visual weight of its clenched-ass-that’s-holding-in-a-turd rear. NA is too Lotus Elan and the NB is bland and generic absent-minded-scribblings-in-a-margin (much like the Pontiac Solstice).

Yngve
Member
Yngve
3 days ago

“The styling decisions that led to the NC1 looking… like that are unknown”

Contemporary motoring press (and my eye) upon the NC’s release noted that it was an attempted callback to the NA’s styling – headlights mimicking the NA turn signal/parking lights, oval grill mimicking the NA’s…oval grill.

As a former NA owner, of the three iterations of the NC, I prefer the NC1 by a country mile.

Last edited 3 days ago by Yngve
Rad Barchetta
Member
Rad Barchetta
3 days ago
Reply to  Yngve

When I owned my NC2, your opinion was the prevailing one. Now the winds seem to shifting toward the NC2/3. No idea why.

Mark Tucker
Mark Tucker
3 days ago

There’s no such thing as a “bad Miata,” unless it has an automatic transmission or has been modified in stupid ways. The reason people thought the NC was a letdown was just that the NA was so very, very good. The NB got a lot of the same reaction when it came out. Sequels are always measured against the original, and the NA was an impossible act to follow.

(Really missing mine these days; I never should have sold it.)

Rich Mason
Rich Mason
3 days ago
Reply to  Mark Tucker

Been wanting one for years. 69 year old knees can’t shift. Will live with an auto gladly, at least till knee replacements are done with…YMMV of course.

M SV
M SV
3 days ago

The NC has grown on me like so many mid 2000s vehicles. You get just about everything modern but not all the tech that breaks and feels old. The era it was born into might be it’s greatest strength. I still think the ND is a better looking but might have too much tech for what it is. How those systems age is anyone’s guess but I suspect they will feel dated and cause issues down the line.
NC have been saved from the nutcases because of their reputation and I suppose the “uncool” factor. You get some people trying to make them better like with the duratecs but don’t really see terrible things done to them like you do with na and nbs. Stanced and static suspensions being some of the most heinous crimes against Miata.

Mercedes Streeter
Mercedes Streeter
3 days ago

Now that I’ve become a member of the “Miata Is Always The Answer” club, I feel like I need one of every generation. I keep eyeballing NCs because their prices seem to stay reasonable, unlike clean NAs and NBs.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
3 days ago

Ho w much do ‘dirty’ NBs trade for? I could be talked out of mine.

Ppnw
Member
Ppnw
3 days ago

As someone who just got out of a 25 year old NB, I don’t think they’re worth it. I loved that car more than any I’ve ever owned but you’re getting 95% of the NB experience in your ND, in a much better/more modern package.

The NC would be an interesting comparison to your Sky. The Solstice/Sky were heavily marketed as Miata-killers at the time and it never really materialized that way.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
2 days ago
Reply to  Ppnw

I believe GM lost a fair bit of money on each Sky / Solstice sold. The process for forming the chassis (or part of it) was quite expensive.

Widgetsltd
Member
Widgetsltd
3 days ago

I have occasionally thought about building up an NC Miata for endurance road racing, to replace my team’s current and rather old car. These thoughts started when we were soundly beaten by an NC at Willow Springs a few years ago. I think that they were even sandbagging a bit…

AnscoflexII
Member
AnscoflexII
3 days ago
Reply to  Widgetsltd

So the NC is related to the RX-8, which is a very solid platform, and I’ve read that the NC is a great platform for an LS swap. It’s a solid chassis. I have daily driven a ‘14 Club for a decade, and it is far more solid than my NA was at the same age. Like, I wouldn’t have really wanted to drive my NA from Chicago to the Twin Cities at this age, but I’d do it right now in my Club. I’ll probably do it in a couple of weeks!

they’re a really good platform, is what I’m saying.

Data
Data
3 days ago

To date, the only Miata to offer a retractable hard top. The RF is really just a targa top. On the other hand, the hard top tends to amplify interior noise rather than quell it.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
3 days ago
Reply to  Data

I hate driving my NB with the top up. The soft top makes the thing a noisy place to be even if you can deal with being that confined. I’d imagine a non-deadened hard top could be worse.

Phuzz
Member
Phuzz
3 days ago
Reply to  Data

I have the power hard top, and yeah, it’s pretty loud at motorway speeds.

Username Loading....
Member
Username Loading....
3 days ago

But if I, a real Miata owner (nb), don’t hate on the NC, how will I feel validated in my choice of Miata??

Canopysaurus
Member
Canopysaurus
3 days ago

That validation comes from the shit-eating grin on your face every time you wring out a backroad.

H4llelujah
H4llelujah
3 days ago

Just give it a little time. The hardcore Jeep community experienced something similar when the 2007 JK model came out. V6 is garbage! It’s too wide! It’s too long! Too many electronics!

Now that the oldest JK is nigh on 20 years old and decent examples can be picked up for 7-8 grand, the Jk is having a moment.

Was it as “pure” a Jeep as the TJ? Maybe not, but for the money it costs to get into one, you’re hard pressed to find a more fun and capable vehicle. Same story with this MX-5.

Martin Witkosky
Member
Martin Witkosky
3 days ago

Was the NC the first Miata to have those individual rollover hoops? I quickly looked at pictures of the NB and didn’t recall seeing them. To me, they’re ugly as hell.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
3 days ago

No prior Miata had any kind of roll hoops / bars from the factory.

Rich Mason
Rich Mason
3 days ago

Could be ugly, but preferable to a broken need in my assumption. YMMV

Zipn Zipn
Member
Zipn Zipn
3 days ago

They’re not exactly roll-over hoops. They’re pretty sturdy and way better than style bars, but not as sturdy as proper roll bars. Still better to have them then nothing at all.

Trust Doesn't Rust
Member
Trust Doesn't Rust
3 days ago

I will admit to at one time being an NC cynic, mainly due to its exterior design. However, as time has passed, I realized that it’s actually a pretty good looking car adorned with a face that’s not bad…but it’s not great either.

Rich Mason
Rich Mason
3 days ago

an aftermarket grill and front would make me happier.

Squirrelmaster
Member
Squirrelmaster
3 days ago

I’m in complete agreement with this. I understand the love of the NA and NB, but I don’t get the hate of the NC. Unlike the NA and NB, I can actually fit in the NC. Also, the NC still handles great, isn’t as sparing in creature comforts (not that it is in any way a luxury car), and still has good aftermarket support. I’ve more than once considered picking up an NC, but I need the NC3s to depreciate a bit more (I agree the NC1 isn’t the best looking).

Rich Mason
Rich Mason
3 days ago
Reply to  Squirrelmaster

same

Hotdoughnutsnow
Hotdoughnutsnow
3 days ago

Well, now you’ve pointed out the front end to me, and I can’t unsee that. No Sir, I don’t like it.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
3 days ago

The NC1 is the coolest looking face out of the NC 🙂

Also, the NC has 4 cupholders for 2 people, which makes it awesome

3WiperB
Member
3WiperB
3 days ago
Reply to  Dogisbadob

But all 4 cupholder are in the worst spots. I always use the one in the passenger door.

NC1 is also the only one that gets Winning Blue, but only for 2006.

1 2 3
83
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x