It seems like every long-produced car has a generation that is detested by enthusiasts and owners alike. You have the 7th gen Civic with its rampant transmission issues, the C3 Corvette with its wimpy power figures, and the humble, horribly misunderstood NC Miata. I have never truly comprehended why the NC was so universally disliked online. I had one as a daily driver for years after buying it new in 2015. I started modifying it in 2019, and continued to daily drive it until I upscaled to my Mazda3 Hatchback in 2023. To this day, nothing I have owned has fully lived up to that happy little roadster.
The third generation, or NC MX-5 Miata, was produced by Mazda from 2006 until 2015. Prior to the ND, or 4th generation, its nine-year lifecycle was the longest production run of any generation of Miata since the nameplate’s creation in 1989.
More notably, the NC was also the first generation of Miata to squeeze a 2.0-liter engine under the hood. They still didn’t make a significant amount of power–in the low 170s at best–but in a car as light as a Miata it’s really all you need. Also, if we’re going purely on technicality, the NC and ND are not “Miatas.” They are merely “MX-5s” as Mazda dropped the “Miata” name with the introduction of the NC (Sorry, Mercedes).
What’s In A Name?

When the Mazda Ibuki Concept was shown at the 2003 Tokyo Auto Show, attendees and journalists alike immediately noted that it was most likely a sign of what’s to come for the world’s best-selling sports car–and they were partially right. The concept, as they often do, differed significantly from the production NC that was unveiled a couple of years later.
The Ibuki concept had a wheelbase that was nearly a foot shorter than the NB’s, made 10 more horsepower from a teeny 1.6L engine, and incorporated cool gadgets and gizmos like in-seat AC vents. With the production NC varying so heavily in such significant ways, like being noticeably larger and heavier with a disappointing lack of the aforementioned seat vents, you would imagine the press would have torn it apart, but they didn’t. They absolutely loved it.
Motorweek praised its “motorcycle-quick” steering. Edmunds praised its comfy interior dubbing it “an ideal companion for spontaneous adventures.” Car and Driver even called driving the 2006 NC Miata a “joyous experience that verges on religious.” Despite all of the initial praise the new Miata received, it was on the receiving end of a significant amount of hatred by passionate Miata and car enthusiasts alike online.
While the NC Miata is, generally speaking, more positively viewed in 2026, it’s still pretty widely disliked. As a resident automotive Facebook group lurker, I asked about 60,000 people across a handful of Miata-specific and general car interest groups to see what specifically the most common gripes were. To no surprise, the complaints could generally be broken down into three general points:
- It’s too heavy and slow.
- It’s ugly.
- It’s a bad Miata.
‘It’s Too Heavy And Slow’

Despite this being the most common gripe towards NC Miatas, the nameplate is largely known for two things: being lightweight and low power. After all, the 1990 USDM Miata weighed just over 2,100 lbs and made a piddly 116 horsepower. This combination of qualities, along with its perfect 50/50 weight distribution and well-tuned factory suspension, meant that even at the absolute limit of power, any amateur driver with two brain cells to rub together could easily (and relatively safely) drive the car down a twisty road with no other emotion than absolute glee.
The NC weighs a minimum of 2,450 lbs depending on trim, which is the equivalent of an NA with a refrigerator (weighing 350 lbs) somehow strapped to it. That much of a weight difference might seem extreme, but over the same time period the Honda Civic Si bloated from about 2,300 lbs all the way up to almost 2,900 lbs for a 600-lb gain. The Ford Mustang went from 2,800 lbs to almost 3,400 lbs. Cars, in general, tend to get heavier as time crawls forward thanks to things like size preference and safety regulations, not because of laziness or poor skill on some poor chassis designer’s part.
Official spec sheets released by Mazda only state a 24-lb difference between the equivalent trims of the 2004 NB and 2006 NC, meaning the weight jump from NA to NB is far greater than the jump from NB to NC. The bare frame of the NC Miata is a whole 3.5 lbs lighter than its predecessor, all while increasing its torsional rigidity by an astounding 47%. The engine, despite being higher displacement, is a wonderful 42 lbs lighter than the standard, naturally aspirated engine in the NB. Even at its heaviest trims, the NC weighs 31 lbs less than the turbocharged 2004 Mazdaspeed Miata and makes only 8 fewer horsepower.
The Mazdaspeed Miata (MSM) is lauded as being the best Miata for speed lovers. It produces 26 lb-ft more torque than the NC, making it feel punchy but still light on its feet. Upon its release in 2004, MotorTrend even called it “A Miata with Muscle.” However, the NC is still objectively faster, with the 2006 GT earning a 0.3 seconds faster 0-60mph time and quarter mile than the 2004 MSM, according to Zeroto60times.com.
The NC also sports a very slightly better power-to-weight ratio and higher redline of 6,700 rpm which gets even higher depending on model year and trim. My 2015 Club trim had a 7,200rpm redline–and trust me, I loved using every bit of it.
‘It’s Ugly’
Aesthetics are one of the most subjective things out there. People, now more than ever, build their entire personalities around their preferred aesthetic. From the quarter zip-loving finance bros and pink pilates princesses to the studded belt donning alt baddies and their Sylvia Plath loving, matcha-drinking “performative male” counterparts–the human species is one ultimately guided by things our eyes like looking at. Our cars are no exception.
Mazda is no stranger to making beautiful cars. The current elegance of its Kodo design era, all the way back to the striking lines of the 787B Group C race car, and the almost European simplicity of the NA Miata, gave the manufacturer a reputation of making cars that are effectively motorized pieces of art. However in the mid-2000s the company was in an awkward teenage phase, with their cars bearing big toothy grins, cat-eye-shaped headlights, and plenty of matte black plastic in their interiors. The NC Miata was not saved from this fate, with its first release being outfitted with a catfish mouth-shaped grille and blobby oval headlights. The first facelift gave the NC2 its signature goofy grin.

The styling decisions that led to the NC1 looking… like that are unknown, but the car still was undoubtedly in line with Mazda’s overarching design language at the time. Cars of the early 2000s, in general, were becoming more organically shaped, with smooth curved lines and rounder motifs that are in stark contrast to the modern taste of automotive designers adding body creases in places just seemingly for the hell of it.
These rounder lines did, sadly, seem to visually emphasize the NC Miata’s relative largess compared to its predecessor. It was half an inch higher off the ground, an inch taller and wider, and had almost two inches added to its wheelbase and length. That may not seem like a lot, but when the car is basically the size of a shoebox those small increases are immediately noticeable. The last facelift of the NC, the NC3, is widely regarded as the best looking and the most aggressively styled. The entire aesthetic of the car was sharpened just enough to be distinguishable to the trained eye from the NC2, and in my opinion, enough to make its otherwise blobby profile look less like a benign growth and a lot more intentional.
I’m not going to sit here and try and pitch the NC Miata as one of the best looking cars on the planet because frankly–it isn’t. But it’s very, very far from the worst looking and I think we as a collective need to be more accepting of things that simply look average.
‘It’s A Bad Miata’

If I were being a pedant, I would say “Correct! It’s technically not a Miata, it’s an MX-5.” But the mere technicality of what’s on the nameplate doesn’t detract from the fact that many of the words journalists used to describe the very first Miata back in 1989 (via pre-release drives) were used to describe the NC when it was the new kid on the block. An original Car And Driver review of the 1990 Miata complimented its open, roomy cockpit, simple gauge cluster, shockingly high redline, its artfully crafted suspension and direct, analog driving feel.
When I test drove the NC that I eventually purchased in 2015, all of those sentiments carried over. In fact, I was only purchasing an NC because my NA sadly had to be laid to rest after developing a gnarly crack in its engine block. I test drove an ND since they had the 2016s on the lot at the time, and it felt almost robotic in comparison to the NA that I so deeply loved. It was closer in size than the NC, sure, but it felt too modernized. Its throttle felt oddly detached from its engine response, and the fully electronic power steering was almost arcade-like when
I compared it to the NC’s hybrid electronic-hydraulic power steering. The current and third iteration of ND has solved these issues, but back in 2015 they were too glaring to ignore. When it came down to it I ultimately picked what felt most like the NA Miata that I limped over to my local Mazda dealership that day–and that was the NC.
Driving dynamics aside, many of the complaints about the NC being a “bad Miata” are tied to its weight and size, but as I’ve outlined earlier in this rambling of a madwoman masquerading as a thought piece, they’re exaggerated. In my aforementioned polling of some groups on Facebook, a very common sentiment was that people hated NC Miatas and thought they were the worst of the now four generations until they drove one, whether in a stock or modified form. As soon as they got behind the wheel, the friendly little NC became a favorite.
The Reality of NC Ownership
Outside of being vastly underrated for its driving experience and looks, the NC Miata is generally speaking a fantastic option for a daily driver, weekend car, autocross build, track car, or really any other purpose you can dream up. It also has the most cargo room out of any of the other 3 generations of Miata, so you could even take one to Costco for your monthly large scale impulse buys and paper towel restocks. They Say M.I.A.T.A (Miata Is Always The Answer) for a reason, and the NC is no exception.
Its near lifelong stint being the most universally hated Miata generation has largely saved it from the “Miata Tax” that has caused NA and NB values to skyrocket in recent years. For the same cost as a relatively stock or tastefully modified, well maintained NA you can get a car that’s 20 years newer with a nicer interior, more trunk space, more power, and is more reliable with less effort. The price ranges for recently sold NA & NC Miatas are very close to one another, so if you have $15,000 to spend on a Miata you have a pretty wide range of options.

Personalizing your bargain sports car will prove to not be an issue either–as their popularity in track driving communities means NCs have incredible aftermarket support. They were also in production for almost a decade, so sourcing OEM parts for them is incredibly easy and if you want to shell out the cash, Mazda will even still sell you a pretty good chunk of their original parts catalog. And if you feel like being crafty, they were built on what is essentially a shortened RX-8 chassis platform, so a lot of RX-8 parts serve as OEM+ functional upgrades for NCs.
My personal favorite upgrades were RX-8 sway bars, which offered about a 25% increase in thickness to the NC’s stock sways, and the intermittent windshield wiper switch. If you’re feeling especially chaotic, there is even wide aftermarket support for swapping in a Duratec 2.5L engine that can output close to 300 horsepower with a tune and turbo added.
I think, collectively, the car community owes the NC Miata an apology. For years it was ruthlessly ridiculed for being bloated, ugly, slow, and just generally bad–but it has always been just incredibly misunderstood. Recently the tides have started to shift, as more and more people get their hands on them in the affordable used market and realize how amazing they really are. Sure, an increase in desirability may make prices jump up eventually, but until then, NCs will be the comfortable, affordable, smiling underdog of the Miata family.
Top photo: Author









I have some seat time in all generations of Miatas and I most recently drove an NC (with a turbocharged 2.5 and good suspension) about 24 hours ago. I’m in a building right now with about a dozen Miatas of all generations scattered about.
My theory about why the NC was disliked from the start was the suspension tuning, specifically the shock valving in the Bilsteins found in the Sport model*. The 2006 I drove first was losing the plot whilst driving down the straight business loop near my office, flopping all over the place. A new set of shocks and it was a much better car.
Mazda finally fixed that shock tuning in 2013 with the NC3, but by then the damage had been done. The biggest NC enthusiasts are all ones with NC3s, it seems, and this is no coincidence. Had the NC3 been introduced in 2005 – and there’s no technical reason it couldn’t have been – the world would have a different opinion of the model.
I think another strike against the car is the fact that the NA and NB feel faster than they are, but an NC is faster than it feels. That’s great on the racetrack, but if your only goal is driving pleasure it’s actually a bit of a problem.
Personally I prefer the ND over the NC because it has more joy in the way it dances, but that’s a personal preference.
*Mazda has valved Miata Bilsteins poorly far more often than they’ve valved them well. 1994-05, not great. 2006-12, awful. 2016-17 soft tops, over damped. The current ones are quite good though.
Great insight as always Keith. You ‘da man!
I always thought the stock NC2 on the track was a little out of whack. Not saying it wasn’t fun, but the boat moniker seemed to fit it as it wallowed around a bit.
My NA never scared me once. My NC scared me all the time. I was so confident I could never really get into too much trouble in the NA.
It’s a fantastic car. It just doesn’t compare well against the other generations of Miata.
I want an NC so I can put this on it:
https://bbrgti.com/products/bbr-mx-5-nc-super-225
ITBs!
I never disliked the NC. I think it looks fine, especially the trim around the wheel wells… it’s clean and sharp looking… still very much a Miata. I’ve yet to own one myself (I had a NB as my first Miata, and currently have a NA as pictured below, with a small Bosch dishwasher crammed into its rump) but would happily do so (I want to have a ND too eventually). I think people just like to ‘pile on’ when it comes the h8ing the NC.
https://imgur.com/a/zvfXd3d
Yeah most real “NC haters” online have never driven one, a lot have never driven any Miata. I quite like the NC, not least of all because I’m tall and fit best in them. But let’s not use this article as an excuse to raise values though cause I’m trying to buy one in the next 6 months or so, hah! Also, the best looking NC front is the Mazdaspeed bumper for the NC1, it’s significantly better than any other in my opinion.
One correction, they dropped the Miata name for the NC, but brought it back for the ND. Mazda’s site and ND titles will call it an MX-5 Miata. So now it’s both.
You all may know my position on the NC1 already from my profile in Member’s rides https://www.theautopian.com/sedan-van-and-miata-what-more-could-you-want-members-rides/ NC1 GT in green with the saddle brown leather and brown soft top.
One quick point for anyone considering an NC – It has an Achille’s heel. The coolant overflow tank is made of plastic and it’s actually pressurized. They are a weak spot and known to fail rather dramatically bringing you into head-gasket hell.
There are aftermarket metal ones. It’s the first mod you need to do when you get an NC. Change out the time-bomb tank.
I convinced my mom to buy an MC3 a couple months ago, and will be doing this for her this summer when I go visit.
Sigh.
*unzips FB Marketplace*
It’s OK, plenty of people will join you in your opinion. Everyone knows the last REAL <insert enthusiast automobile here> is the one that they own, and the ND’s been out plenty long enough for a lot of folks to own NCs.
I’ve really enjoyed the NCs I’ve driven until the top goes up– somehow they made them larger on the inside and yet, my long torso fits much better in my NA. I understand that you can re-hang the seat-pan in the NC to get an inch or so more clearance, so it’s a problem I can fix, and I do kinda need a new daily driver… Hmmmm.
We can’t allow pieces like his to get published, because I already wanted to buy the cheapest/least-loved Miata! Now people will get wise and prices will go up…
Aren’t the NC’s the ones that can take the 2.5 from a Ford giving it the sameish horsepower and like an extra 30-40 ft-lbs right in the mid range? And aren’t the NC’s the years when the cockpit got wider and longer? I always liked Miatas or MX5’s or whatever you want to call them. I just remember having to crawl out onto the ground to get out of the one I tried sitting in. I think it was a 1st or 2nd gen car.
Yep, that’s the one. In theory, it’s a bolt-in swap plus some re-programming the ECU to know what to do with the extra half a liter.
I guess I need to try sitting in one of these.
I currently have an NB1 which I’ve had for about 6 years now and dearly love. I consider it one of the best purchases I’ve ever made. It’s a fantastic little car for going out for a cruise after work or on a sunny weekend. I don’t daily it (company truck does that duty) but I’ve still managed to put 35k on the car in 6 years which I think is fair for what is basically a toy.
But I won’t deny that I’ve been considering a NC PRHT for some time now. The NB is wonderful on the backroads, but absolutely miserable on a log highway drive and I’m a bit of a roadtripper. The slightly larger size, quieter interior (with the hardtop) and more importantly, higher final drive ratio of the NC is starting to look pretty appealing. the 4k rpm at highways speed of the NB wears the nerves pretty fast. The noise is absolutely relentless.
I’m not a huge fan of the looks of the NC but I may make the swap anyway.
You won’t be sorry. It makes a great budget GT. I think the hard top, when up, actually looks quite good – sort of a ZO6 vibe.
My father has an NC. Fun to drive and reliable but for me the seat is torture after about 25 minutes. It’s not the only vehicle that my back doesn’t agree with but I find the seat in my NA to be very comfortable.
I am thinking about selling my Honda Insight Gen 1 to add a Miata NC stock, that way my NB supercharged has some company. This is how I ended with two dogs, our little demon yorkie wants all the attention now lol
I have an interest in gen 1 insights
I read the bell jar around the time these came out. The bloated styling and those stupid wheel arches killed these for me.
That said I don’t physically fit in the NDs. Every time I see a clean NC with hardtop at a car lot now, I stop and sit in them to see if I can live with it. This year may be the year of the boat.
I love my NC2. Being the largest MX-5 is an advantage to me as it’s roomy and comfy enough to daily drive or road trip. The added comfort and security of the PRHT adds to its daily driving ease and the Mazda suspension package fits me as the perfect compromise between comfort and sporting pretentions. Did I say some form of “comfort” a lot? Being 50-something, I make no apologies for that nor do I have anything to prove to anyone.
I had an NC about ten years ago.
I think the only negative things can be seen in comparison with the other gen MX5’s.
But at that time, the NC had better rust proofing and was a more modern and comfy daily. While at the same time coming very close to the fun of the older roadsters on empty twisties.
And as a car, I just want to put out that I paid about 250 euro in 2018 for a major service, including distribution belt. That alone will make sure this car will last forever.
I just bought an NC, and for me the main reason for picking it over an NA or NB was that it’s Euro 6 compliant, so I can drive it into the city without paying ULEZ charges.
I’ve never driven any other MX-5, so personally I’m not missing out on anything.
(Buying one just as petrol prices go through the roof wasn’t a great idea though).
You could be burning a lot more fuel than what your MX-5 burns.
QUIT TRYING TO SAVE THE NC! People will see you are right and the cheap generation will get pricy.
Everyone in my local canyon community absolutely glazes the NC, so not sure on the initial premise, lol. Good car tho.
I’m not a big Miata guy overall, but I appreciate what it is – a back to basics roadster. So I’m glad it exists.
So from all the generations, I agree with the masses (who haven’t driven one and might not even fit in one) that the NC is the worst generation.
It’s not just that it’s ugly, it also makes the fatal mistake of being too cute. For a car that is already a little iffy on the testosterone scale, most enthusiasts, who lets face it are typically male, don’t usually want something cute. We put up with ugly, if it looks mean or angry, but ugly and cute steps too far into Pokemon territory for the mid 20 to 40 year old dudes who traded their last Pokemon cards years ago.
I had an NC-1 after my Evolution VIII MR got hit, until I moved onto Porsches.
It was cheaper to insure than a Toyota Corolla, and never needed anything other than consumables in the 8 years I drove the nuts off of it. Aside from the times I can count on one hand I rented something due to weather or needing to haul, it did everything I needed it to. Plus it lost less than 40% of its value, from new, over 8 years.
I was reminded not having a roof is like +100HP, because you feel everything.
When I did have to commute for a while, it was nice to wind it out on every single shift, foot to the floor, using every scrap of it. I loved to harass things like 335is and S4s as I could just neatly zig between traffic, where they couldn’t. On backroads I learned to ultimately drive everything much harder, because the NC taught me to be neat, tidy, and smooth so I kept cornering speeds and corner exit speeds high. Plus I could just huck it into a corner, and keep my foot in it for clean little drifts.
NC-2s are better to wring out and not fish-faced like the NC-1. NC-3 Clubs are big smiles per dollar. They don’t depreciate. The MZR engine and the cost-optimized RX-8 transaxle are bullet proof. Parts that do wear out are cheap. Tires and brakes are cheap. Insurance is as cheap or cheaper than economy cars. It has everything you need and nothing you don’t, but can still do everything you need it to do.
Legit one of the best cars I ever owned, without question. ZERO regrets.
I had your MR on a poster on my wall as a kid, in the dark gunmetal color. Sorry to hear yours got taken out!
Mine was Graphite Gray! I still have the binder I made for the car.
Though the US “Graphite Gray” was different than the paint available outside the US market. The US version was cheaper, whereas in other markets it was much more of a chroma-flare like paint that really shifted color under street lamps and such.
What I still say about that Evo (and especially IX MR) despite now being in Porsche RS cars, is TO THIS DAY you cannot buy ANY other car that was AS peaky and boosty outside of like… a Porsche 996 GT2. That’s the next car that feels like Evo VIII – IX’s did. Though the lack of refinement in the Mitsubishis — similar to Miatas — is also what makes them really fun.
Nice! My poster was an RHD MR, so most likely that “better” one. For some reason, tween me thought those vortex generators were the shiz lol.
I have ridden in a modified X many times, and also had a Stage 2 LGT for several years so I can imagine(ish) what you’re talking about. They don’t make them like that anymore!
Ill admit I was a little nonplussed about the nc1 looks. It along with the first gen rx8, looked a bit lost compared to the outgoing rx7 and mazda 3.
But I was absolutely on board when the big dumb smile showed up.
The whole lineup had a wonderful cohesion that most brands would end up overdoing.
If I wasnt so smitten elsewhere for my convertible needs, I would be the 4th NC owner i personally know.