Home » Four Recalls And Over 200,000 Cars: Jeep’s Massive Cherokee 4×4-System Debacle Gets Even Worse

Four Recalls And Over 200,000 Cars: Jeep’s Massive Cherokee 4×4-System Debacle Gets Even Worse

Jeep Cherokee 1 Copy

If you’ve spent any time in the Jeep Cherokee community, chances are you’ve heard of someone who’s dealt with a broken PTU or have dealt with one yourself. The PTU, or the power transfer unit, is a transfer case that transmits power from the transmission to all four wheels in KL-generation Cherokees. And from the start to the end of production, it’s been a huge headache for owners and Jeep. On Tuesday, Jeep issued a recall for faulty PTUs—the fourth such recall since the car went on sale.

Since Jeep began delivering Cherokees in 2013, owners have had to deal with PTUs, built by a supplier called American Axle (which currently goes by Dauch Corporation) that fail without warning, leaving drivers without motive power or the ability to put their cars in Park, sometimes leading to dangerous situations on the road.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Jeep tried to fix this issue with software before eventually replacing PTU units entirely. Despite knowing about the issue for years, the company has just issued another recall for PTUs built well after it first found out about the problem. And right now, there appears to be no clear, solid solution in sight for owners.

A Timeline Of Events

Let’s start at the beginning. The KL Cherokee first went on sale in 2013, but it wasn’t until 2020 that Jeep issued its first recall for the PTU, specifically part numbers 68090605AJ, 68090605AK, 68090605AL, 68282447AA, 68282447AB, 68282447AC, 68307403AA, and 68307403AB, citing no fewer than 839 warranty claims as the reason why the potential issue was flagged in the first place. It covered vehicles built from April 2014 to October 2016.

As far as safety recalls go, this one was pretty serious, as a failure meant that AWD-equipped Cherokees, which sent power only to the front wheels under normal driving conditions, could become fully undrivable. From that 2020 report:

Relative movement in the PTU between the differential input splines and the transmission output shaft may result in the teeth of the input splines wearing off, which may eventually cause a loss of engagement between the transmission and the differential inside the PTU. If this occurs, torque cannot be transferred between the front wheels and the transmission which results in a loss of motive power while the vehicle is in motion and a loss of the PARK function while stationary.

2019 Jeep® Cherokee Limited
The Jeep Cherokee may be based around a front-wheel-drive layout, but Jeep still offers a range of four-wheel-drive models that use the PTU to shift into low range. Source: Jeep

Rather than going through the costly and time-consuming task of installing new PTUs in the 67,248 potentially affected Cherokees, Jeep determined that a software update would be an apt remedy for the problem:

The remedy component will be a software flash that, if failure of the input splines occurs, causes a MIL to illuminate, rear axle engagement to prevent a loss of motive power, and electronic parking brake activation when the vehicle is in PARK to prevent a loss of PARK function.

While that sounds more like putting a tiny bandage on a deep, open wound than actually fixing the dilemma, it did solve the safety issue that prompted the NHTSA-mandated recall. At least with this software update, drivers wouldn’t be totally stranded should the PTU’s spline to the front wheels shear away.

Jeep issued an additional recall in 2023 targeting another population of Cherokees built between September 2015 and September 2016 that used a PTU with a “revised design” from earlier models. It involved 25,980 cars, cited the same internal spline problems, and used an identical software-based solution to mitigate the safety issue.

Snapringjeeppart X
Source: Jeep

Of course, the drama didn’t end there. In 2025, Jeep issued another recall for Cherokees equipped with faulty PTUs, for cars built from October 2016 to February 2019. Targeting another 63,082 potentially affected vehicles, the problem this time around could be traced to an “improperly seated input shaft snap ring” that allowed for “uncontrolled movement of the input shaft inward.” This allowed the original spline problem to rear its head again. From the 2025 recall report:

Uncontrolled movement leads to the potential for wear to the range shift sleeve, spline damage, and / or range fork damage which can cause an unexpected loss of motive power or loss of PARK function while stationary.

Snapringer163251 E1737638484605x
The snap ring that is likely the culprit can be had for around $30 from suppliers like MyMoparParts.

For the 2025 recall, at least, Jeep’s solution was to actually replace the PTU with a new unit if it arrived at the dealership already broken (it would get a software update otherwise, per instructions from Jeep listed by the NHTSA). In the remedy section of the recall report, Jeep also mentioned that it would reimburse owners who paid for a new PTU out of their pockets.

Now, in May 2026, Jeep has issued a fourth recall for yet another batch of potentially defective PTUs. This one covers 61,711 cars built from December 2018 to February 2023, when production of the KL-generation Cherokee ended.

The safety risks involved with this defect are the same—when the PTU fails, the car can lose all motive power, and the Park function may no longer work. But the recall document doesn’t list a description of the cause. A Jeep spokesperson told me only that the PTUs “could experience an internal failure.” One could only assume this recall is also spline-related, given the identical safety concerns. That’s just speculation at this point, though.

These Poor Owners

Ptu Issues Jeep
Source: Cherokee Forum

As The Autopian noted in our article on the snap ring issue last year, there is no shortage of Cherokee owners complaining about their PTU failures online, either through Reddit or on KL Cherokee forums:

Ultimately, you don’t have to go far to find owners frustrated with this situation. Reddit is full of stories of failed PTUs, with one owner complaining they had the part fail three times after repeat replacements. Similarly, over on Cherokee Forumowners have shared tales of sudden and shocking failures. “My 2019 Cherokee Trailhawk’s PTU failed and we lost power while driving in the fast lane of a major freeway,” stated user Ngates in May last year. “My boys and I fortunately made it to a narrow shoulder where we were stranded for awhile before a dangerous exit when the tow truck arrived.” The upshot of their case was a long wait for repairs due to backordered parts, suggesting a significant demand on the supply of new PTUs.

Reddit Jeep Fails
Source: Reddit

It’s not like things have gotten better since that post was written. Another Reddit thread on the KLCherkoee Subreddit, published a few months ago, contains nearly a dozen more owners who claim they’re on their second or third PTU, voicing the same concerns about turnaround times and parts availability. Meanwhile, there are dozens of PTU failure-related threads on the JeepCherokeeClub.com forum stretching back years.

Why Does This Keep Happening?

When I reached out to Jeep asking how these recalls, which seemingly involve the same or similar failures, keep happening, the company didn’t give me an answer. Instead, a spokesperson provided me with a blanket statement reaffirming the latest recall information without touching on any of the previous recalls (emphasis theirs):

FCA US LLC is voluntarily recalling an estimated 61,711 U.S.-market vehicles to address a potential issue involving certain two-speed power transfer units (PTUs).

An internal investigation identified that some model-year 2019-2023 Jeep® Cherokee vehicles may be equipped with PTUs that could experience an internal failure. In rare circumstances, this condition could result in a loss of propulsion at any speed or allow a vehicle to roll while in PARK.

If the condition occurs, drivers may notice a “Service 4WD” message on the vehicle’s instrument cluster, unusual driveline noise, vibration or a change in drive quality.

The remedy is currently under development. Affected customers will be notified when service becomes available and will be advised on next steps at that time. Until then, customers are reminded to use their parking brakes, as recommended in their owners’ manuals. In the unlikely event of a loss of propulsion, drivers can maintain steering and braking control and bring the vehicle to a controlled stop.

This response leaves me with two questions: Why does this keep happening, and what will be Jeep’s latest solution? The most I can do is speculate based on the information already out there.

Jeep Cherokee Blue
Source: Jeep

If I had to guess, Jeep attempted to remedy the problem with software and updates to the PTU during production, but those updates weren’t enough to fix the underlying issue. The failure points remained in place until Cherokee production ended, and now that the newest versions are a few years old, they’re accumulating enough mileage to show signs of PTU failure, unmasking a problem Jeep thought it had fixed.

The most logical solution would be for Jeep to replace the faulty PTUs (as it did for the 2025 recall) with revised units. Whether Jeep will go that extra mile is anyone’s guess. The company’s approach thus far has been to add software to make sure the cars wouldn’t be stranded, but didn’t actually replace the faulty part with something that wouldn’t break a second time around. It feels like Jeep has done the bare minimum to satisfy NHTSA’s safety requirements, and, unless a significantly revised PTU is installed into these vehicles, it’s possible the vehicles could need a replacement down the line.

Top graphic image: Jeep

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Zipn Zipn
Member
Zipn Zipn
6 minutes ago

Jeep… doing their best to make FORD’s recallapalooza look less crappy.

Data
Data
21 minutes ago

Thank you sir, may I have another!
It’s a Jeep thing, you wouldn’t understand.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
25 minutes ago

We’ll just put this one by the other Jeeps that keep catching on fire and the problem will sort itself out.

UmbraTitan
UmbraTitan
27 minutes ago

Sure, you’re in danger, but we have software than can remind you to use a parking brake! Ugh, the US/French/Italian auto industry deserves to have it’s lunch stolen by China when they weasel out of stuff like this.

Pat Rich
Pat Rich
51 minutes ago

It’s a damn shame, because that AAM drive system (Ecotrac, Ecotrac II, and Ecotrac Lock) were extremely unique and gave the KL a capability that still doesn’t exist anywhere else on a similar architecture. That being said, No other OE picked up on the Ecotrac line and I would guess they saw the wisdom in letting another manufacture be the beta tester first. Sadly we wont likely ever get to see a Gen 2 of this system that irons out the many bugs because no one else thought it was worth it. The KL could have been so good, but it was so rushed. Jeep doing Jeep things.

Nlpnt
Member
Nlpnt
53 minutes ago

Is there a reason why the “RWD and electronic parking brake when park is selected” failure mode software WASN’T included from the factory after the first recall?

UmbraTitan
UmbraTitan
31 minutes ago
Reply to  Nlpnt

That would have cost monies that weren’t mandated by the recall. And Stellantis sucks worse than Scooty Puff Junior.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
54 minutes ago

Something something, Jeep Engineers, Something, “good enough”, Something….

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
25 minutes ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

good enough” – Jeep, probably.

Eggsalad
Member
Eggsalad
57 minutes ago

It doesn’t matter. Jeepers gonna Jeep. It doesn’t matter what crap Stellantis (or FCA, or Daimler-Chrysler) puts out, Jeep buyers will keep buying.

Wuffles Cookie
Wuffles Cookie
22 minutes ago
Reply to  Eggsalad

Yeah, I long since stopped having any sympathy for Jeep owners. You knew what you were getting into, and willingly forked over (too much) cash for a bag of shit labeled “Shit”. Caveat Emptor.

Farmer Meeple
Farmer Meeple
1 hour ago

What’s odd to me is gearing seems like it should be a “solved” engineering problem. How do you not have a proven gearset for these types of things?

Last edited 1 hour ago by Farmer Meeple
Pat Rich
Pat Rich
50 minutes ago
Reply to  Farmer Meeple

No one else made or makes anything like this PTU, it has a 2 speed gearset in it for 4-low (in many models, some are still 1 speed with a similar architecture). It was ambitious, but apparently needed more R&D time.

G. K.
Member
G. K.
22 minutes ago
Reply to  Pat Rich

Yeah, a two-speed transfer case in a transverse powertrain is pretty uncommon.

Pat Rich
Pat Rich
13 minutes ago
Reply to  G. K.

completely unique to the KL at this point.

FormerTXJeepGuy
Member
FormerTXJeepGuy
1 hour ago

If there’s one thing Jeep and their suppliers should be able to get right, its a damn transfer case. Glad I never bought one of these, but just another data point for why you shouldn’t buy a Jeep past the 4.0 I6 era.

Pneumatic Tool
Pneumatic Tool
1 hour ago

Between this and the myriad of issues with the hybrids…oof.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Pneumatic Tool
Alexk98
Member
Alexk98
1 hour ago

Guy 1: “Hey man, can I get a ride to work again?”
Guy 2: “Dude, what is going on? How are you stranded AGAIN? Isn’t your car almost new? What they heck do you drive?”
Guy 1: “It’s a Jeep Cherokee, you know what they say: It’s a MOPAR; NO CAR :(“

4jim
4jim
1 hour ago

Rats, This sucks. I am usually for newer designs but good old fashion transfer cases and normal rear diffs seem to have most of the bugs worked out unlike these overly complex AWD crossovers. (see the bronco sports dual clutch rear drive system with a separate cooling system)

Last edited 1 hour ago by 4jim
19
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x