I adore my life as someone who has somehow made a career out of writing about whatever’s rattling around my brain at any given moment. This career has taken me to places I never would have been on my own and put me behind the wheel of the vehicles I used to dream about as a teenager. But there is one thing about this field that frequently leaves me scratching my head, and it’s the times when embargoes drop. The embargo is an important part of how new car launches and automotive media work, but sometimes they don’t make any sense. Who, exactly, is up at 3 A.M. reading about a new grille on a pickup truck?
The embargo is a handy tool for both automakers and car media. Automotive product debuts are massive undertakings that can cost millions of dollars and involve precise timing. I’m not even talking about the development of the car, either, but just the event to launch it.
Remember when I covered the launch of the Toyota Tacoma and the Toyota Grand Highlander in 2023? Have you ever wondered how Toyota managed to get a whole fleet of trucks and crossovers from Texas to Hawai’i’s Big Island? As Toyota reps told me, they originally intended to ship the vehicles aboard a Roll-On/Roll-Off carrier, but the ship would not get the vehicles to the island in time. Instead, Toyota had to charter a small armada of Boeing 747 freighters and paid around $15,000 per vehicle to fly them across the ocean. Then there’s the hotel, where the 100-plus journalists at the event were staying in rooms that averaged above $1,000 per night. Once you tally up every little thing, the amount of money involved in just telling the world that there’s a new Toyota is almost unfathomable.

All of this was built around a goal to launch the new Tacoma at a certain time that week. Understandably, Toyota didn’t want a journalist ruining its big reveal early. It’s not just about the money, either. There are a lot of people who pour their hearts into these product launches, and they will stand proud when the big reveal happens. So, it makes sense to have journalists sign an embargo, promising that they won’t publish until a certain time.
This can benefit the journalist, too. Depending on when the embargo is, I don’t have to write about a vehicle the moment after I drive it. I’m not racing my industry colleagues to get something out immediately. Instead, we all get the same shot and the same bite at the apple at the same time. The embargo drop also usually coincides with the national or global launch of a vehicle, so eyes are going to be on it.
However, sometimes, these embargo times don’t make any sense.
Why We Sometimes Post Stories At Weird Times

If you’ve ever clicked onto The Autopian while sipping your morning coffee, you might have seen us publish some industry news or a first drive at a time that seemed totally nonsensical to you. A prime example of that is my post today about the 2027 Ford F-150. If you live in the Midwest, as I do, that post went up at 5 a.m., which was at the crack of dawn. If you live in Los Angeles, that post went up at 3 a.m. while you were either asleep, stuck on the late shift, or doom-scrolling social media.
This is pretty common. Automakers will have embargo lift times at some crazy times of day, be it in the middle of the night when people are sleeping or in the early hours of the morning.

Some of these embargo drop times make sense when you think about them. If a car is debuting in Munich, Germany, at 8 a.m., an embargo that lifts at 2 a.m. Eastern Time happens because of the time difference. Strange times for Japanese car launches also make sense, since Tokyo is a whole 14 hours ahead of where I’m sitting in Central Time right now.
Some strange embargo times are also the case just because that’s when a press briefing starts or when the global reveal video drops. Other times, an automaker wants to celebrate a specific holiday, the start of a racing event, or they’ll drop something at midnight, like how movies and video games used to be released. Some embargo times are set to give the media time to get home from a press trip and write something up.
Here are a handful of screenshots of embargoes we’ve honored. A 4 a.m. Eastern Time embargo is perfect to capture the “currently taking a red-eye flight” demographic:

Poor Alanis was burning some late-night oil on this one:

Why did Alpina even bother to do an embargo on this?:

Dodge brings me back to my childhood of waiting in line for Halo 3 at midnight with this one:

Even Jason writes embargoed stories:

You’ll see that many of them drop in the late morning in the United States, which is generally prime time for a car website. Yes, even the Wienermobile has been embargoed! But some embargo drop times come with little explanation.
Often, I find that the American RV industry will drop an embargo at 2 a.m. or 3 a.m. Eastern Time. These always confuse me. The average American RV buyer is not up at that time, and the Indiana RV industry often isn’t advertising their rigs to people in Japan or Europe. So, outside of the managerial decisions that are above my pay grade, there’s little practical reason to launch an RV at 3 in the morning.

RV startup companies are even weirder with their embargoes. I won’t name the exact company, but one RV startup decided to have its new product launch embargo drop two days before the same reveal happened at a press event. Technically, what it meant was that media who did not go to the event, myself included, got to publish their content two days before the people who actually went to the event. Sure, I didn’t make a bunch of YouTube Shorts and videos like the influencers who went to the event did, but I was reeling in traffic before they published a single video.
Then there are the American automakers who are debuting a car for the American market, but have an embargo drop at a time when nobody is awake or is otherwise occupied doing something else. If an outlet is lucky, they get the embargo with enough time to have written the article ahead of time. But sometimes, embargoes hit less than 24 hours after you even get the information. Also, in our specific case, our post scheduler has been broken for some time and forgets to post what we tell it to. Someone has to be awake to make sure the posting robot actually does its job.
It’s not just us who have noticed this. Last year, Doug DeMuro complained about the embargo time on the 2025 Ford Mustang GTD:
Here’s what he stated:
“The embargo for this video is at 6am Eastern, which is 3am Pacific,” Doug DeMuro said during a recent podcast. “If you’re an automaker and you’re watching this, and I know you are … I know you are. Do not make your embargoes 6am Eastern ever. It is a bad idea. You’re trying to get your stuff launched across the broadest swath of North American consumer. I have studied this my entire YouTube career … 13 years.”
“And the answer is you want to go live at noon Eastern, which is 9 Pacific. It hits everybody. It allows the East Coast people to see it at lunchtime and carries your story throughout the afternoon. It allows the West Coast people to get it right in the morning. That is the time you want to go live always, 100 percent. When you launch at 3am Pacific, it makes no sense, it’s insane. The West Coast doesn’t get the stuff. The stuff’s already out when you wake up, the story is lost by the middle of the say. It is bad.”
He’s not wrong, either. I track post data, and there are maybe dozens of people reading articles at 3 in the morning.
Messing With Embargoes Is Bad For Everyone

Now, some of you might wonder why auto media even bothers? Why don’t we just post our story about the vehicle whenever we want? There was a time when one outlet in particular did not honor embargoes. If an automaker sent them embargoed information, they’d write about it right then and there, blowing the embargo. [Ed note: This was Jalopnik, and this was me. Basically, early in the blog days, people were constantly breaking embargoes, and it was extremely annoying. Even worse, people would send us embargoed information before we ever agreed to an embargo, meaning that they were taking away our right to do our jobs as journalists. Rather than deal with all the nonsense, I just decided it would be easier to not play the game for product info. We still did embargoes for press trips. Obviously, no one understands nuance, and this policy became more annoying than helpful, and it was slowly abandoned. – MH] Naturally, the people involved in product launches get their hearts broken when this happens, and sometimes, the publication gets punished by getting blacklisted from events and press loaners.
Alternatively, you could just decide to miss an embargo. This is bad for a different reason. Now, your competitors have leapfrogged you on coverage and have likely scooped up most of the clicks already. It also looks bad to the automaker because now it looks like you don’t actually care enough to honor the embargo. So, most outlets aim to hit the embargo the minute it drops, even if it means writing a post at 1 in the morning and knowing that nobody is going to read the story until hours after it publishes.
So, technically, I know you don’t want to read about a pickup truck at 3 a.m.; the data I have says that you’re probably sleeping at that time. I know I want to be sleeping at that time. But if an automaker really wants third shift workers to know about their newest gray color or slightly restyled grille, automotive publications will set that as their go time. Now, pardon me while I go chug a Red Bull.
Top graphic images: Warner Bros.; Ford









“Who, exactly, is up at 3 A.M. reading about a new grille on a pickup truck?”
I was gonna say… people in Australia, India, China and other countries around there.
Sadly, we don’t really get much traffic from those places. I mean, we have a lovely Australian contingent and others spread out across the UK, Germany, and so on. But casual readers in those nations will usually just read whatever their local car publications are, and probably not at 3 a.m. their time.
But they must be reading something at 3am EST, CST and other North American time zones!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqiUjwi0rqs
Seems appropriate.
PR Guy here. About to weigh in to explain the PR side of an embargo. One caveat: Mercedes is 100% right here. The consistent use of weird times of day is, well, weird. Here’s why I make use of them:
If I have a piece of news that I feel is top tier, or even medium top tier, an embargo gives us the opportunity to shop it around to the publication with the best possible reach without breaking the news too early. It’s super helpful to know that the Wall Street Journal is a “no” a week before you’re able to release your news.
Side note: For me, this is most useful if I’m shopping an exclusive. In other words, a publication agrees to publish the news from my release under embargo, and I agree they get to publish it first. Everyone else gets it later and can decide whether they want to publish it or not.
It’s possible that the weird times are because the news was shopped exclusively to some major publication (more major than The Autopian? Blasphemy. I guess somebody things CNN will cover their new RV reveal?). Technically embargoes don’t work that way – once one publication puts the news out, it’s fair game, but it’s possible some of these companies are trying to give a big publication a head start.
I’m already seeing plenty of comments throwing shade at embargoes, but they are very helpful when it comes to avoiding an absolute clusterf*** of rushing and insanity when it’s a juicy piece of news and you just put it out there for public consumption on a Tuesday morning.
With the embargo, interviews can be scheduled in advance, pressing questions can be handled, lawyers can get involved and tell us what follow-up questions we can answer… and all of this mess can be done when it’s not the last minute.
When I’m sending a press release out, there’s usually a ton of legal constraints we have to clear before we can make the news public, so it’s also possible the embargo is designed to avoid any news getting out before the ink is on the paper and nobody will get sued. I’ve made a career as a communicator out of learning to work with lawyers and doing my best to accommodate legal concerns while still making sure the news publication gets a story that’s worth publishing.
There’s my two cents. I’ll go back to making joke comments on other articles now.
Thinking about this now, are the embargos timed based on historical newspaper releases?
Like, traditionally the papers would be at retailers by early morning.
They better not be anymore unless someone is specifically targeting some print-only publication. The PR world adapted quickly when the news cycle became a 24-hour event. For a second I thought they might be worried about peak internet times, but that’s just for TV shows that will overload a streaming site. That typically doesn’t happen with news unless you’re announcing something HUGE, like a new Citroen 2CV.
Fair. I’m too used to working in industries where change only happens when all other options are exhausted.
Does Argo ever do embargos?
Does Winnebago called theirs the “Winnebargo”?
What about shippers?
Do they have to embargo their cargo?
So many questions! So few answers to be released at an agreed upon date and time!
I think shippers only embargo their cargo when they are Hip and Go to a Bar…
I think I’d rather be sleeping than driving a crew-cab F150, a crew-cab Toyota truck, or whatever Toyota white blob SUV-thing was in those photos.
The wiener-mobile? That might be interesting at least.
I usually get up around 5am central time, and am on the treadmill with my laptop in front of me by 5:15 so I read a lot of these early articles.
So you’re interested in an early morning wienering?
I believe the Toyota blob is a RAV-Bore but don’t quote me on that.
…so I presume an announcement is forthcoming at something like 02:57.15 CDT, tomorrow morning?
LOL! I think I would lose my mind if I saw an embargo specify the exact second to publish something. 🙂
Thank you for this look behind the curtain of automotive journalism. So many things in the world that we take for granted actually take a lot of work and thought behind the scenes to make happen.
I do appreciate when the response to “this is dumb, why” is “because THIS,” rather than no reason.
I’d rather live in a stupid universe than a chaotic one.
Does the backend structure of the website allow you to write an article and then schedule it’s release, or are you actually having to be up at that time to hit the ‘Post’ button?
Oh, now that’s a whole hilarious thing for a different time. Yes, officially, our backend does allow us to schedule posts. However, it routinely decides to do nothing at publishing time for reasons that are beyond our understanding.
The system will even indicate that it missed the scheduled post time, so it knows that it didn’t do it!
That’s an Exhaust Leaks post in the making.
Can you shift an unpublished article between you to leverage the authors’ specialties and location? Let’s say, hypothetically, GM decides to install amber rear signals on all future models and those, not the backup lights, will light as puddle lamps for the cargo area.
That’s obviously a Jason article, but the embargo lifts at 2AM Eastern. Does that mean he can write the article and then hand it off to David to push the “Publish Now, Dammit!” button at 11PM Pacific?
There’s generally someone awake who tries to make sure the publishing robot does its job, even if it’s not for their own article. In my case, I knew everyone else was still sleeping, so I woke up, made sure it published, then went back to sleep. Then, I had a dream about a Ford F-150. lol
I thought you guys had everything written and ready to go and the computer is set to publish it at the exact time?
We usually try to do so, but sometimes, the embargo comes in late enough that we don’t really have enough time to write something earlier in the day to schedule later.
Also, our post scheduler is broken, so there’s a 50 percent chance that it won’t actually publish the article. I made sure I woke up at 4:58, watched the system actually publish the F-150 post, and then went back to sleep.
Ooof, I’m sorry about that. I definitely have even more appreciation for what you guys do. I hope you guys get that post scheduler fixed!
So what you’re saying is SWG did in fact write the JAAAAAG article but the scheduler just failed to publish it?
I actually have no idea what happened with that piece of Autopian lore!
I’d rather be sleeping in my bed, crashed out
Thanks for this low-key Exhaust Leak. It’s a good primer/reminder that something that seems as seemingly straightforward as words on a website has a whole lot of machinations behind it, and that’s before you even get to actually picking the words and putting them in a hopefully nice order, or if you’re from the Torchinsky School of Journaltastic Writification for the Especially Erudite and Hirsute, at least a memorably unsettling combination of words.
Nice work channeling Torch’s style while describing Torch’s style, some sort of Torch-duck-en if you will.
Embargos are dumb.
Don’t want your PR released before a given time?
Don’t send it out.
Simple as that.
Its like putting dessert in front of my kids but telling them not to eat it while I leave the room and wait for me to get back… good luck
I can understand the point for press trips. As Mercedes said, it makes it more fair and I suspect leads to better stories. Otherwise you’d have journos publishing “reviews” 2 min after getting in the car trying to be the first to post.
But yeah, for a press release…the embargo should be when the OEM hits “send.”
Presumably this is a remnant of the pre-internet world of print publication when things would take different durations to arrive in the mail?
I disagree. Embargoes (used correctly, anyway) give outlets a chance to digest news and write a proper story about it, rather than rushing to be the first to print and firing off a bunch of shallow, probably inaccurate, knee-jerk reactions. If you want car news to be nothing but regurgitating press releases, then by all means, eliminate embargoes.
Like it or not, timing matters a lot. If you’re a day late publishing a story because you did some actual research into it, you can lose a huge amount of potential traffic when all your competitors posted their AI-summarized press releases before you did. It sucks, but it’s true. Now more than ever, I suspect.
Considering most new vehicle reveal “reviews” are just reworded, regurgitated PRs…
…with the more significant ones stretching out content for days afterward of “Things we didn’t know to tell you until now about the new
SlateFathomMustangPorsche 911 derivativeNissan Armada Nismo(fill in the blank) wedrovereceived a PR kit for last week….”…and the fact that many of us don’t rely upon just one blog/site for our news – it’s not a true loss when one outlet puts their article out a couple hours after “Auto A.I. Blog-du-jour” posts theirs.
Even given a search for news/content, Google and other search engines spits out results that are most recent first – – not first first.
Enbargoes are good for the members of the press, the business of journalism, and for the quality of the articles that we get to read. Without such a system, there would be a mad dash among the journalists to get their story out first, because the first story of a big reveal is likely to get the most clicks. This will lead to a bunch of low-quality “articles” being shoved out, likely with incorrect information, all in a race to be first. The publications that have higher editorial standards would publish articles late and miss out on the needed traffic.