Home » Our Daydreaming Designer Re-Imagines Vector If They Made Amphibious Supercars

Our Daydreaming Designer Re-Imagines Vector If They Made Amphibious Supercars

Vector Amphi Top

Here’s a scene from an alternate reality episode of the MTV-infuenced oh-so-eighties Miami Vice:

Miamivice

Sonny Crockett: “Lieutenant…the Testarossa still has a rod sticking out of the block, and the Donzi barely floats…I understand that we’re dealing with an entrenched bureaucracy and things take time but I can’t keep showing up at six figure drug deals in a Plymouth Reliant or some bass boat without blowing a departmentally approved cover, and…”

Lieutanant Castillo: “…it’s out back…(pause)…”

Sonny Crockett: “..what?..A new car?”

Lieutenant Castillo: ..(silence)

Sonny Crockett: “..is it a boat?”

Lieutenant Castillo: “….(pause)….it’s both…..”

Keytar music starts to play as they walk into the back parking lot to see the nearly new 1989 Vector W15, freshly seized by the DEA–the fastest amphibious car on land and water ever made–if it existed, which it doesn’t.

Big Amphivector

Our own Jason Torchinsky has tirelessly (well, at least a few times) argued about the viability of amphibious play vehicles, and he’s made a number of good points as to why they should exist.  However, even he would likely admit that any independent company attempting to seriously make an amphibious vehicle would have to be absurdly tenacious and borderline batshit crazy.

As it so happens, I know who would have been the perfect guy for the job.

If there is a person that could have beaten Malcolm Bricklin or even Donald Trump for self-promotion, it must have been Jerry Wiegert, the recently deceased designer and builder of an all-American hypercar called the Vector.

Weigart

After attending CCS and Art Center, Weigert spent a decade developing his concept vehicle with ‘aircraft quality’ parts and ultimately plastering it on the cover of many, many car rags. Nobody outside of Jerry had actually driven it to test his four-second-to-60 claims, mind you, and the few production units would wait another ten years to appear, and they still barely ran.  Tennis star Andre Agassi demanded a refund when exhaust heat melted the carpeting in his Vector.

Vector1

Like Delorean and Bricklin, the whole Vector ‘Aeromotive’ venture unsurprisingly failed (I know that he barricaded himself into his office with armed guards after the company was bought some investors) and he even lost ownership of the Vector name.

Did he give up after that? Of course not! His next venture was the ‘Aquajet’, an ultra fast ‘wet bike’ Jet Ski thing. Here are some later Vector cars coming to visit the site of this next endeavor. Note the Vector logo side marker light on the oh-so-1991 teal one…Ice Ice Baby!!

Vector Waterjets

I honestly don’t know the fate of the AquaJet, but a quick search would indicate that it went the way of the Vector.

What went wrong?  A lot of things, but the main issue is that there were plenty of good options already for supercars and fast watercraft. When badge snobbery is more important than performance, you’re fighting a losing battle, even if your product works, which his essentially didn’t. You need to find something that NOBODY else offered.

What’s the alternate reality?  You Autopians are smart; you can see where this is going, right? Weigert could claim (legitimately) that no other person on earth had the experience in creating a supercar and a fast watercraft that he did, so he was the only one qualified to make a performance amphibious car.

Presenting the Vector W15, so named because the of the length of this thing as a boat…and a car, of course.

I need to add something to Torch’s assessment of most amphibious vehicles made- they usually end up looking like just a car plopped in the water. You’re out on the lake and pull up next to a guy in a Cobalt with everyone sunbathing and hanging out, and next thing you know you’re sitting in some floating car. Who wants that? Here is where the real difference would be from previous amphibians: The Vector W15 would have transformed into something more boatlike. The low, pointy body of the Vector really has more in common with a boat hull than a car anyway.

For this amphibious venture, Wiegert would have started with the same mid-engined format as the W2 and W8, and still be powered by a V8. The W8 had a racing engine that NEVER seemed to run right. I think he’d be better served by going back to a hopped-up bored out and twin turbocharged Corvette motor as in the earlier car. The W2 and W8 were automatics only, which makes the transmission situation easy for the amphibious car. He would have needed a transfer case to switch power from the rear wheels to the two steerable JetSki-type impellers. I’d put radiators on both sides of the motor, and I would LOVE to find a way to get the thing to be cooled by the raw water when it’s a boat; how could that work?

[Editor’s Note: This is exactly how lots of marine engine cooling systems work! They pump in the surrounding water into the water jacket, then pump the heated water out, at least for fresh water. There’s systems for sea water that transfer the heat from coolant to the seawater. Here, watch a video:

See, Bishop? There are still wonders in the world, even our tedious real world. – JT]

Amphivector2

 

If at all possible an air/pneumatic suspension would have been great to suck the wheels up into the wells as far as possible to cut resistance in the water. The spoiler up front, used to create downforce on land, would have made the nose submarine in the water, so it would have needed to tilt to allow the nose to rise under power as a boat. I did a lot of extensive nautical research (meaning I did a google image search for ‘boat’ and looked at pictures of like five boats…maybe even six) and it’s obvious that the nose needs to sit high for the thing to look…you know…’boaty’. That’s a Navy term there, by the way. The Vector is designed so that while floating in water there is more buoyancy up front so that the car-which-is-now-a-boat has a more leaned-back stance.

Diag1

How would it have converted to a more ‘boatlike’ format? First, the glass sunroof would raise up and become the ‘boat’ windshield. Next, the seats would rise up on scissor-jack type mechanisms and let the driver and passenger poke through the roof. The controls/instrument panel would electrically slide up the A pillars when in this ‘flying bridge’ boat mode (by the way, as a ‘boat’ you could have kept it in car format if you wanted and drive it that way, sunroof closed…but there would have been an interlock so you couldn’t drive it as a car when you’re elevated out the sunroof!).

The instrument panel design itself mimics the one in the Vector W2 and W8, a slab-type affair that was supposed to simulate fighter jets (and also did not require complex production molds). Note that I used vacuum fluorescent displays and a Buick Rivera touch screen (why not take what already exists for something built in the dozens?) for climate and radio functions.  Also, there are lever controls for throttle and trim (for boat use) and the selector for the GM automatic transmission (car mode). I think we could make the boat throttle be able to drop down out of the way for car use.

Dash1

So why does my Vector amphicar look a bit like a wagon?  I wanted high air intakes for the motor (sort of like a VW Type 2, 3, or 4), and cargo space over the engine. The rearmost roof panel could tilt up at speed to create a rear spoiler (sorry..no insane wing in back of this thing).

There’s more tricks: After raising the windshield for boat format, the roof panels behind would have folded back to cover the backlight, giving a more traditional boat stern look and a place to put the name of your boat (practical question– can you name an amphibious car as a boat or is that a violation of nautical protocol? Or is there some superstitious thing that you shouldn’t do that?).

Roof1

Rear1

At the rear, note the ‘black hole’ slots which would have been for engine exhaust and heat exhaust, plus the taillights hidden behind there (anything would have worked, as long as they were flat..maybe upside down 1982-87 Cavalier taillights?) The rear license plate and back bumper are submerged when this amphibian is in the water.

So the Vector W15 would have given you everything except the kitchen sink! But an option would have existed to rectify that last omission!

With the rear roof panels open, the aforementioned cargo space over the engine would have been an open space for a variety of uses in boat mode. Options for this space could have included a wet bar (fold down faucet) with mini fridge or a small jump seat for a third person (you’d pretty much need to sit sideways) or a full width ‘couch’ (if you didn’t get the wet bar option).

Rear Int

A flip up ‘light bar’ enhances the boat look and gives a place for the DOT approved elevated white light, and lights underneath as well for cabin glow. There could have been padding stored rolled up in the front trunk to throw on the hood/windshield to allow sunbathing like a forward deck (no pop up lights, just waterproof covered lights that include red/green navigation lights for boat mode). The padding would have hooked onto the front lip of the trunk lid, and would have magnets securing the sides, so it would have stayed in place even at speed.

Would it have sold? I think it could have. We’re not looking at some orthodontist that would have driven to work, he would have just gotten a 928GTS and kept some kind of boat at the yacht club (where his social life is based anyway). Look at who bought the few Vectors made: Arab sheiks and a tennis celebrity. It wouldn’t have been the fastest car or fastest boat available by any means, but guys like Andre likely had a half dozen fast cars and boats anyway, and I KNOW it would have been the fastest car that could turn into a boat by far. They’re all toys for this kind of buyer, and this would have been the ultimate party trick toy. The toy you can’t get anywhere else, so that’s the edge Jerry would get. And if it made in appearance every Friday night on NBC, who knows where Vector Aeromotive would be today.

 

Images: galant.commycarquest.com, facebook, offscreen.com

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit

22 Responses

  1. When I was a kid my folks took me down to a concert at the Jefferson Memorial on the Tidal Basin in Washington, DC. The water was filled with colorful Amphicars, along with paddle boats all bobbing up and down to John Philip Sousa’s patriotic “Be Kind to Your Web Footed Friends.” It was a delightful childhood memory.

    I’m pretty sure that memory would be ruined if the Tidal Basin had been filled with 25, 1,500 horsepower silver AmphiVectors, all driven aimlessly and aggressively by cocaine fueled 20 something (get off of my lawn) offspring of billionaire government contractors.

    As near as I can tell, the Amphicar is the only moderately successful amphibious production vehicle to have been produced. It had 43 horsepower.

    I think the Vector is cool. With wheels and a barely functional racing engine. Thankfully, there were only a few built and that makes them more rare and exotic.

    Sometimes history gets it right.

  2. I can definitely believe that the tech boomers of that era would have bought this car without a doubt. My question would be, what colors would it be available? Boats are usually white with graphics, but you can find other colors. But cars on the other hand….

    1. I did silver, but in reality the buyer of this thing kind of cheesy thing would have ordered it in white with white wheels, and maybe teal and pink stripes on the sides….with drop shadows of course. To match his Gemballa 911

  3. Torch, Bishop – So its normal to run the water of whatever you’re floating in to cool a boat. However, if you think about for a little bit, its probably a Very Bad Idea to then close that fluid up in the engine and let that stay there.

    A water to water cooling system could work, but you very much do not want to let sea water into your cooling system.
    Corrosion will happen, kittens will weep, planes will crash, puppies will die, it will be the start of Very Bad Things.

    Other than that, I like it.

    1. My 1979 San Juan 28 sailboat sports its original (!) raw-water cooled (!!) two-cylinder Yanmar diesel, semi-reliably delivering its 14 horsepower in the salt water of Puget Sound.
      To reduce corrosion, it has a pair of zinc anodes srategically positioned in the cooling system. (This reminds me — it’s time to change those out.)
      I rebuilt the engine once (about ten years ago) and still no water in the oil, nor vice-versa. The aged inboard continues to perform well — I use it weekly — and its only issues are more compression- rather than corrosion-related.

    2. Mr. Asa- I agree that it would never make sense to have the fresh or salt water running in the engine, since you need a standard cooling system for land use. Having water flow over the radiators as a heat exchanger makes more sense, but still not enough sense to justify it (and then your fans would be submerged as well as a boat which is not a great idea). I believe the Amphicar has the radiator mounted over the engine very high up.

  4. I like this idea, and most of the features, but I think there’s a space issue here. Looking at the image that shows the driver position in car vs boat modes, there isn’t much space behind them. Yet somehow we get a wet bar or couch? That’s gonna be cramped, especially with the light bar in the up position.

    1. You’ve got that right. Well aware that there would barely be much space to do much more than open the fridge. Realized as I was adding crap that I really need to stretch the wheelbase …but that would be the least of the issues in getting this thing to be real. But it just wasn’t stupid enough without a sink.

  5. “Oh Sea Dee” is hilarious – I’m sure not original with you but awesome nonetheless.

    One thing I consistently enjoy about your fantastical speculations is your take on interior design. I appreciated the detail of the boat throttle and the gear shift, although I have to ask – what’s wrong with the good old gas pedal that’s already there? I know that’s not a conventional boat control, but this is anything but conventional.

    Delving into realistic problems, as another poster noted you won’t have much room behind once you elevate the front seats into position. This is an artifact of the highly slanted windshield – a more vertical windshield would help a lot, but would also kill much of the supercar vibe and mess up your geometries for a front deck. The difficulties of the mechanical connections for the steering column are quite real, although I think a telescoping column in the cabin going down to a U-joint may serve. Also, the wiring harness and ducting for the instrument panel are going to get real interesting.

    The sheer ridiculousness of the built-in wet bar is wonderful. If we’re going for cocaine-fueled fantasy let’s go all the way!

    As always, thanks for a fun ride through some creative insanity. Love your articles!

    1. OrigamiSensei- glad you like the concept! A few things:

      -There are two possible issues with using the gas pedal. First, with the seat elevated it might be tough to reach. Secondly- and this is an odd one- if typically-non-boat-owning people use the gas pedal there is a tendency for them to hit the brake pedal as well when it’s used as a boat and subconsciously think it will stop! Sort of like the muscle memory thing where the left foot of stick drivers will hit a nonexistent pedal on the floor when they first get into an automatic. The hand control keeps your mind in ‘boat’ mode.

      -The steering could indeed be done with telescopic rods and universal joints. The wiring harness could be a small issue compared to other challenges. Ducting might just stay where it is- and the dash (and eyeball vents) would sync up with it is in the lowered position. Not like you’ll be running A/C in boat mode (or at least elevated boat mode).

      -As mentioned earlier, would likely need to be a longer wheelbase to have anything more than just a tiny wet bar and Lotus Evora-level rear seat.

      1. You’ve convinced me on all points. Didn’t really stop to think about those factors with a gas pedal and you’re absolutely right. Also the ducting and wiring considerations make sense. Thanks for the response.

  6. With a wedge shape so much like the James Bond Lotus Esprit, it is almost disapointing, that it doesn’t dive too.

    Had a talk with an Esprit owner, when I took the 356 to the Kronborg Castle classic car meet this sunday, and the engine-placed-in-hole-in-the-cabin-floor vibe, with a removabel dome over it, was actually very much like an inboard boat motor.

    But as always a nice effort from you, with all the fun and funky details! I’m not too crazy about your computer colouring skills, but I really like the lines and style on the black and white sketches.

  7. I like this very much…

    As to: “… practical question– can you name an amphibious car as a boat or is that a violation of nautical protocol?”

    I am not sure, so I propose a compromise:

    “Boaty McCar-Face”

    although I do love Oh Cee Dee …

    My only quibble with the design is the disappoint lack of provision for water-skiing. Could life ever get any better than water-skiing behind this thing while your giggling, slightly-drunk, bikini-clad, girl friend takes the wheel?

    1. Lokki- yes, it could get better…having controls to drive the thing on the ski handle so you can operate it while you waterski…your girlfriend can just sit in the cramped rear ‘seat’ and empty the mini bar.

Leave a Reply