Home » Pardon Me, Do You Have Any Grey Poupon? 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs 1989 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur

Pardon Me, Do You Have Any Grey Poupon? 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs 1989 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur

Sbsd 7 31 2026

For our final one-make Showdown of the week, I thought we’d class the place up a little bit and look at some Rolls-Royces. The British firm has a long and rich history of making some of the finest cars ever, but that doesn’t stop depreciation from hitting them hard. These two are a bit out of our typical price range, but they’re still pretty cheap for what they are.

Yesterday we looked at two Suzukis, one that was sold here new, and one that came in after it got old enough for the government not to care anymore. By more than a two-to-one margin, you chose the 4×4 Vitara that came here through official channels when it was new. The automatic transmissions in both cars sapped some of the fun, but the majority of you felt like it was a bigger sin in the little Alto.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I agree. I think the Alto with an automatic would be a fun curiosity for a little while, but it would get boring quick. A manual would make that car more entertaining for longer. The Vitara should also be a stick for maximum enjoyment, but it’s fine with an automatic. I guess.

Screenshot From 2026 07 30 17 25 49

I want to start today’s Showdown with a book recommendation: The Perfectionists, by Simon Winchester. It’s an excellent history of precision measurement and its importance in shaping the modern world. It’s a fascinating read, and I think plenty of you would find it as entertaining as I did. The reason I bring it up now is that it includes an entire chapter on Rolls-Royce. In it, I learned that you should always refer to the company by its full name, Rolls-Royce, and never shorten it to just Rolls. Why? Because Henry Royce was the engineer who made the early cars as good as they were. Charles Rolls was mostly just a salesman.

Rolls-Royce cars are more myth than machine these days, since only a select few can afford its now BMW-based offerings. But cars from the 1970s and ’80s can be found for relatively cheap, parked neatly at the bottom of their depreciation curve. They’re expensive to maintain and repair, and sometimes not worth the trouble. But at these prices, the temptation to be able to say “I drive a Rolls-Royce” can be strong. Should you give in? Let’s take a look at a couple of them and find out.

1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow – $13,525

00d0d Guijdvmd53d 0ci0hs 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Engine/drivetrain: 6.75-liter OHV V8, three-speed automatic, RWD

Location: Santa Monica, CA

Odometer reading: 23,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Rolls-Royce didn’t actually sell any complete cars until 1949. Before that, you bought a running chassis from Rolls-Royce, and had a coachbuilder put a body on it. In 1965, however, Rolls-Royce jumped into the modern era with this car, the Silver Shadow, which has a unibody design. This car was built for fifteen years, and it’s still the car I think of when somebody says “Rolls-Royce.” Absolutely everybody famous had a Shadow at some point, and now you can have one, too.

00n0n Kx2xth1pket 0ci0hs 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Behind that classic waterfall grille and Spirit of Ecstasy hood ornament is a 6.75-liter V8, with “sufficient” power output. It drives the rear wheels through a GM Turbo-Hydramatic 400 transmission – yes, the same transmission as in your uncle’s Impala. It’s probably the most reliable part of the whole car. It’s not the only part of this car sourced from another company; it also features a self-leveling hydropneumatic suspension system licensed from Citroën. The seller says it runs and drives “exactly as it should,” but doesn’t provide any details.

00a0a Awfnv25tes2 0ci0hu 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

The end of coachbuilt Rolls-Royces meant a certain degree of personalization was lost, but the possibilities were still extensive. Witness this car’s green (!) leather interior. Green interiors weren’t that uncommon in the ’70s, but typically you’d seen them in green cars, Pintos and Skylarks slathered in green vinyl and fake plastic woodgrain. This isn’t that. This is Connolly leather, wool carpets, and burled walnut. The front seat bottoms need some repair, but the rest of the interior looks really clean. I don’t know what’s up with that steering wheel, though. I’ve never seen one like that in a Shadow before.

00b0b 2wjwthfnzmz 0ci0hs 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

It’s in good shape outside, but that added-on bump strip along the side is absolutely criminal. Hopefully it’s just the tape-on kind, and no holes were drilled in the doors. I do kind of wish it were some other color besides white, but I don’t know what else would go with the green interior. Green, I suppose.

1989 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur – $9,900

00d0d 2ic8xybi14s 0ci0t2 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Engine/drivetrain: 6.75-liter OHV V8, three-speed automatic, RWD

Location: Woodland, WA

Odometer reading: 71,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

The Silver Shadow was replaced in 1980 by the Silver Spirit, along with a long-wheelbase version called the Silver Spur. It’s largely an evolution of the Shadow, with updated styling and a few technological advancements, but the broad strokes are the same.

00j0j 6puyaumzcth 0ci0t2 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Its 6.75-liter V8 is the same as the older model, only this one is fuel-injected. This engine actually existed long before and after this car; it was in production for an astonishing sixty-one years. It’s still backed by a TH400, and the suspension is still hydropneumatic. The seller says it runs and drives well, but it needs new tires; they’ve aged out. And it needs an alignment after the tires are replaced.

00e0e Ax434cl7v50 0ci0t2 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

The interior is the classic Rolls-Royce concoction of leather, wood, and wool, but in a more sedate color scheme. Everything is power-operated, of course, but it doesn’t all work; the power seats and a couple of windows are inoperable. It wouldn’t be a British car if all the electrics worked, though, would it?

00m0m 3okdnttir0v 0ci0t2 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Outside, things are a little weird. This car originally had a vinyl top, but the vinyl has been removed, and the roof has been painted with what the seller calls “black undercoating.” It’s a strange choice. I guess it doesn’t look terrible, but can’t you come up with something better for a car like this?

There are probably more foolish things to spend money on than a fully-depreciated Rolls-Royce, but few as classy. The expensive-to-fix parts of both of these work fine, so you should be good for a while, but the repair bills will catch up to you eventually. Until then, however, you get to see that winged hood ornament guiding you on towards adventure – or maybe just the supermarket for some mustard. Which one would you choose?

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
120 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago

Back in my mid-70s college days I saw a silver Silver Shadow wafting around La Jolla under “sufficient” power. It looked splendid in silver, and I remember thinking to myself “I wonder what one of these would cost used some day?” It turns out maybe less than I thought. I didn’t know these had Citroen-style suspensions. In white and with an almost guacamole green (and oddly weathered) interior, this one looks a lot less splendid. Especially with those rub stripes. The Silver less splendid still but if I have to DD, I’d trust it more, once the things that don’t work get sorted out.

I imagine FI would be less fiddly than a pair of SU carburetors and might be a bit less thirsty and the power a bit more “sufficient.”

Last edited 1 month ago by Cars? I've owned a few
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
Member
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
1 month ago

Silver Shadow! Wow, this is definitely not a “Shitbox” day but I definitely like both of these, crazily. They are just so nice, but definitely not to the wallet and peace of mind. They are not my kind of cars at all, but I still appreciate them. This was kinda difficult, but I HAVE to go old skool- I much prefer the more classic ones like this- and that green interior is amazing! The newer interior is too bland/neutral to me, comparably. It great these both have big ol awesome V8’s in them. I will enjoy cruising (don’t need a chauffeur) around in it in the lap of luxury like riding on a cloud of comfort in a big ol land yacht beast. I’d paint it blue (or green?) and actually put miles on the thing. Maybe I’ll even manual swap but keep the radio as close as possible, that way I can change stations while putting my own grey poupon on my sandwich while shifting, thank you very much…ha ha
“Pardon me, do you have any grey poupon?”
“Wayne’s World! Party time, excellent!”

M SV
M SV
1 month ago

I know they are both likely horrible cars. I typically will go fuel injection but between the strange rear end on the newer one and likey lucas electronic on top of all the weird rolls stuff I think the older one might be a safer bet and is better looking. The 89 screams original owner jumped out of a building after being over leveraged or drug overdose. The 74 still seems classy.

Scott
Member
Scott
1 month ago

Sitting this one out.

Rockchops
Member
Rockchops
1 month ago

The shadow just looks more classic. The boxiness of the spur I guess had its day, but it’s just not as classy in my book.

The green interior is also just awesome, even if worn. I’ve read that the biggest parts/financial drag on these cars is the braking systems, which are pretty bespoke? The 6.75L parts can be found reasonably easily since it had such a long run. I don’t know how true this is, but it’s tempted me.

Robert Turner
Robert Turner
1 month ago

Living in the UK during the entire production runs of these two cars, I don’t remember very many RRs being white. Cheap white Rolls-Royce usually means ‘Wedding car with nasty respray’. The Shadow would probably have been sold in British Racing Green and the green interior would have looked great.

IF the shell is rust-free then the Shadow is a much better deal for a slightly masochistic enthusiast.

M SV
M SV
1 month ago
Reply to  Robert Turner

I think white might be more common for the US spec. Especially for California. It wouldn’t surprise me if someone was trying to match their house. White on the outside avocado green on the inside. Its seems to me like most in the US cars are one of the silvers then one of the browns or off white then probably white and black after that then maybe the burgundy or red then maybe the blues and green. The later cars might be blue at a higher rate.

Interesting site showing all the factory colors.
https://www.rrsilvershadow.com/EKleur/Kleur1.htm

The yellow and bronze cars pop up sometimes here. Some of those blues you rarely see if at all.

Dan Roth
Dan Roth
1 month ago

ABSOLUTELY NOT.

Neither of these.

“Hand-made” can be a pejorative, even if it’s dressed up in finery.

The purchase price is just the beginning – these things are nearly as particular and expensive to maintain and repair as exotics.

Tbird
Member
Tbird
1 month ago

I’ve seen vinyl tops replaced with spray on bedliner on old Malaise era barges locally, but never on a Rolls Royce. That fuel injection system looks utterly terrifying. Gimme the classic Shadow.

Last edited 1 month ago by Tbird
Gubbin
Member
Gubbin
1 month ago

Silver Shadow survivor for me. I love the green, it’s a more reasonable size and I’m not riding in that enormous back seat. Also, emissions compliance scares me a lot more than old carbs do.
Just have to find a Citroen mechanic for the suspension.

Y2Keith
Member
Y2Keith
1 month ago

Does that ’74 have a 5-digit odometer? Because those seats look more like 123k miles than a mere 23k. Still, that green interior is calling me, and the 8-track rack in the center console is a nice curiosity.

Get those front seats redone and paint the outside a pale, sage green (aka the color of money!) and it’s a winner for me.

ETA: Replace that steering wheel too, either with an original or a wood-rimmed aftermarket one.

Last edited 1 month ago by Y2Keith
Matt Sexton
Member
Matt Sexton
1 month ago
Reply to  Y2Keith

One thing I’ve noticed with old Rollers, even ones from the 90’s, is the seats seem to age terribly.

Cerberus
Member
Cerberus
1 month ago
Reply to  Y2Keith

Had the same thoughts. Sage with maybe a cream coachline.

Son of Dad
Son of Dad
1 month ago
Reply to  Y2Keith

agreed on all counts!!

Roofless
Member
Roofless
1 month ago

Unless that roof mod was some kind of commonly accepted way to fix or replace the vinyl, I’m steering clear of the second one. The only thing more expensive than “used ultra luxury car of questionable provenance” is “used ultra luxury car of questionable provenance with visual evidence of a prior owner too cheap to maintain it correctly.”

Call this the “all original, save rims, tint, and stereo” rule.

Last edited 1 month ago by Roofless
That guy
Member
That guy
1 month ago

Both

Manwich Sandwich
Member
Manwich Sandwich
1 month ago

Newer and cheaper one for me that also seems to need less work. Also I prefer fuel injection over carbs any day.

Edit… in the ad for the 1974 Rolls, anyone know why the seller puts “[1, 2, 3]”, “, “[1, 2, 3, 4] and “[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]” beside some points?

What’s that supposed to be about?

Last edited 1 month ago by Manwich Sandwich
The Mark
Member
The Mark
1 month ago

This jumped out at me too: • Displacement: \(6.75 \text{ liters}\) (\(412 \text{ cu in}\))

Did the seller use some kind of template that they completed online and somehow it doesn’t copy/paste right?

Last edited 1 month ago by The Mark
M SV
M SV
1 month ago

It’s most likely formatting likely carried over from an ai output. Could also be carried over from formatting in some document. Possibly with linked sources. They pasted into CL and their html wysig took it and displayed it like that likey as they don’t allow some functions or broken formatting from website style or similar. Some wysig editors have a paste a plain text function to clean up weird formatting carried over like that.

Last edited 1 month ago by M SV
Cyko9
Member
Cyko9
1 month ago

The price disparity made it a tough decision, but the Silver Shadow won me over. If I’m going to put effort (and money) into a car like this, I’d want the classic prestige. The green interior is unusual, but that also contributes to its uniqueness.

ImissmyoldScout
Member
ImissmyoldScout
1 month ago

I just can’t with the green interior.

Phil
Phil
1 month ago

Agree. Looks like a Ford Country Squire.

Last edited 1 month ago by Phil
The Bishop's Brother
Member
The Bishop's Brother
1 month ago
Reply to  Phil

And that’s…… Bad? 🙂

Phil
Phil
1 month ago

lol. Only to some. As an unwashed Philistine I may not be capable of appreciating such finery.

Matt Sexton
Member
Matt Sexton
1 month ago

It’s amazing how cheap Silver Spurs have gotten, and I keep getting them in my feed because apparently I’ve clicked on them too many times in Hemmings.

In any case, from what I’ve learned about these, the seats are each controlled by their own ECU which is powered by a specific battery, which when they go bad will leak electrolyte on the circuit boards. All of this is expensive, so if you’re shopping a Silver Spur that “only needs power seat fixed” do a bit of research first.

I’m still picking the Spur, because the seats are nicer. For whatever reason it seems Rolls Royce seats wear terribly. Also the Shadow is just a bit too fogey looking for me.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
1 month ago

I can redo the interior of the Silver Shadow II and still have an interesting/unusual color combo, or I can redo the Everflex roof of the Spur (I’d select a tan or brown roof) and still have rectangular headlamps.

It’s the Shadow for me.

Njd
Member
Njd
1 month ago

Heck I’ll take both. When one breaks I’ll drive the other.

Banana Stand Money
Member
Banana Stand Money
1 month ago
Reply to  Njd

Correct answer – plus as much as I love the green, I’m not sure if I would be in the mood be surrounded by it every day.

RayJay
RayJay
1 month ago

Depending on his mood, the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh had 93 to choose from for daily drives around his Oregon compound in the 1980’s.

Phil
Phil
1 month ago
Reply to  Njd

But what happens when they both break?

lastwraith
lastwraith
1 month ago
Reply to  Phil

Your butler doesn’t have their own car? Send Jeeves to get whatever it is.

If you need to go somewhere, crowd into your chauffeur’s Honda.

Pneumatic Tool
Pneumatic Tool
1 month ago

This was a battle of the heart and head. Heart wanted the original, but head saw the interior of the Spur. Heart obliged and agreed with head until head started extrapolating exactly what early electronics might mean for one of these things, and the whole roof thing put a few more questions into the mix. The heart (now utterly disgusted by the waffling) told the head to STFU, go with the Shadow and enjoy the (very) relative simplicity of the package, while it soaked in the ambiance of something that was once considered the absolute pinnacle of automotive luxury.

Dan Roth
Dan Roth
1 month ago
Reply to  Pneumatic Tool

I will say, “early electronics” means “able to be repaired/serviced” a lot of the time.

But I will also say that the ’80s was not “early” for electronics and you may find more ICs and surface-mount than you expected.

Today, if some of these things are unobtanium (like the op-amp or RISC IC no longer exists for the power seats or whatever) you can probably work up an emulator with a Raspberry Pi or something.

Or just…not. These are probably more satisfying to get cash pressed into your hand for their weight in scrap than they are to own or drive.

Mad Hungarian
Member
Mad Hungarian
1 month ago

That steering wheel in the Shadow is 100% aftermarket, early-mid 80s is my best guess. Looks a lot like a Personal or Nardi from that era, I used to sell tons of them at Auto Drugstore in Montreal back in the day, but I don’t recall ever seeing this exact model.

Last edited 1 month ago by Mad Hungarian
SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
1 month ago

I would dump either of these in a second for a Bently Turbo R. Jay Leno describes it as the car you use to pick up the in-laws from the airport. I think it would be interesting driving such a “sporty tank” of a car.

Looking at my comment, I guess these could also be used to pick up someone from the airport.

Squirrelmaster
Member
Squirrelmaster
1 month ago
Reply to  SlowCarFast

I’m with you – if I’m making a financially-devastating choice on a British luxury car, it is a Bentley Turbo R, not a Rolls-Royce.

TheNewt
Member
TheNewt
1 month ago

If I’m going to buy a money pit, I buy one with class and originality. Silver Shadow today.

Manwich Sandwich
Member
Manwich Sandwich
1 month ago
Reply to  TheNewt

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Grayvee280
Member
Grayvee280
1 month ago

Had to go old school. As a child of the 80s, it is what Rolls Royce looks like in my head.

I also want to stuff a black wing from a caddy in it. Silent exhaust, stock tires, the gentlemen’s sleeper.

Manwich Sandwich
Member
Manwich Sandwich
1 month ago
Reply to  Grayvee280

[1, 2, 3, 4]

Slirt
Member
Slirt
1 month ago

the older one’s steering wheel looks like a pre-merger [old skool] AMG wheel to me…

Canopysaurus
Member
Canopysaurus
1 month ago

Rich people in Rolls Royces went from looking for Grey Poupon in the 80s to these days looking for average Joes they can poop on.

Last edited 1 month ago by Canopysaurus
lastwraith
lastwraith
1 month ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

Pretty sure they’re just pooping on anyone who isn’t a billionaire+ these days, at least in the US.

120
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x