Home » Which Friendly Little Suzuki Could Warm Your Cold Heart? 1997 Alto Works vs 1999 Vitara

Which Friendly Little Suzuki Could Warm Your Cold Heart? 1997 Alto Works vs 1999 Vitara

Sbsd 7 30 2026

It’s easy to be cynical about cars these days. Prices are high, styling is by and large atrocious, and everything feels way too serious. Add in all this self-driving folderol and the headaches that go along with a car being connected to the internet, and the modern automotive landscape can make you want to give it all up and just walk everywhere. But luckily, I have a one-word cure for your gearhead blues: Suzuki.

Yesterday was all about Nissan. We looked at cars from two different eras, and considering Nissan’s reputation in recent years, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that the older Stanza won. The Versa may have done better if it had a manual, but the CVT’s reputation sealed its fate.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Ordinarily, I would choose the Stanza as well, but I remembered, too late to mention it, that the Stanza has automatic seat belts. I can grudgingly tolerate them, but my wife hates them, so the old beige box could never find a home in our garage. I rented a first-generation Versa back when they were new, and it was fine. I’m sure it still is.

Screenshot From 2026 07 29 17 09 05

Suzuki stopped selling cars in the US in 2012, after two and a half decades. It all started with the Samurai and the badge-engineered Chevy Sprint, both of which defined the term “cheap and cheerful.” The company still sells motorcycles, ATVs, and boat engines here, but we are denied the latest iterations of fun little vehicles like the Swift and the Jimny. We have to get our Suzuki fix on the used market. Fortunately, lots of cool little Suzukis have aged into import eligibility and have found their way to the US. Today, we’re going to take a look at one such import, and one small SUV that was sold here new.

1997 Suzuki Alto Works – $7,500

685310886 970418345911077 634146379420651272 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 658 cc DOHC inline 3, three-speed automatic, FWD

Location: Durham, NC

Odometer reading: 130,000 kilometers

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Japanese kei vehicles are a hot topic these days; these pint-sized cars seem to have taken American car culture by storm. The vast majority of kei cars aren’t all that interesting, though; most are just boring little hatchbacks. Enthusiasts tend to favor the spicier variants. After all, it costs the same to import a regular Suzuki Alto as it does this turbocharged Works model, so why not go for the fun version?

681322668 971009671951034 4962611576531851630 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

I didn’t realize this until I started looking into them, but the majority of kei cars are automatics. You’d think small cars would benefit from a manual transmission, but I guess traffic is bad enough in Japan to make the automatic more desirable. Kei engines are limited to 660 cubic centimeters, and a “gentleman’s agreement” between automakers limits horsepower to 64, but this Alto, like many others, pushes right up to those limits. I would imagine that just about anything modern could outrun this thing, but it sure looks fast, and I bet it feels fast, since it’s so small. It just had a bunch of maintenance work done, including the timing belt, so it should be good to go.

681174381 35134232606192052 2366037518511346774 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

The interior is in good shape, and it includes these racy-looking seats. It is of course right-hand-drive, which presents all sorts of challenges in a left-hand-drive country, but kei cars are pretty narrow. There’s a chance you could just lean across to reach drive-thru windows.

684154075 964478766543639 6401918193505724443 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

It has been repainted, and it looks like it used to be white. I’m not sure if I consider the red an improvement, but it is nice and shiny. The wheels have some scuffs on them, but that’s all I see. I do love the double rear spoiler, though I don’t know how much good it does on a car with a top speed of 85 MPH.

1999 Suzuki Vitara JX – $4,995

00o0o 283vsrsceav 0es0co 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Engine/drivetrain: 2.0-liter DOHC inline 4, four-speed automatic, 4WD

Location: Kent, WA

Odometer reading: 166,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Suzuki first built a small 4×4 way back in 1970, and first sold one in America in 1986. The Jimny, sold here as the Samurai, was a big hit – despite Consumer Reports best efforts – and in 1989 it was followed up with a larger and more sophisticated model, the Sidekick. The Sidekick was also sold through Chevy/Geo dealers as the Tracker. For the second generation, Suzuki dropped the Sidekick name in favor of Vitara, the name used in the rest of the world. By the time this one was built, most Vitaras were four-door wagons. This two-door convertible is uncommon.

00z0z Jq7pwu65blb 0gw0co 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

The old Samurai and Sidekick were not known for an excess of power. This second generation does a bit better, with a 2.0-liter four that makes 127 horsepower and 134 pound-feet of torque. This one has an automatic transmission, which wouldn’t be my first choice, but sometimes you have to take what you can get. It’s being sold by a dealer, so we don’t get any history. As always, you’d be wise to do a careful inspection, or bring along someone who can.

00n0n Drj4qghcam3 0gw0co 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

The Vitara is a lot nicer and more car-like than earlier Suzuki 4x4s. It has power windows and air conditioning and all that good stuff, which makes it a little more pleasant to live with if you drive it daily. It also has cool seat fabric, though it does sort of give Extended Stay sofa vibes.

00n0n F3m3mjnwpy9 0gw0co 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

I don’t think it’s actually green on the bottom; I think that’s just a weird tone in the photos. It’s probably silver. This would have originally come with a soft top, but it wears an aftermarket cap that sort of looks like a tiny truck topper. Whether or not it still includes the soft top, I don’t know. It also looks like it might have had a tow bar on the front bumper too; these were popular as tow-behind vehicles for RVs, because of the manual transfer case. Put it in neutral, and you can flat-tow it easily.

These are both a little expensive for what they are, but that’s just how the market is these days. Sure, they’d be more engaging with manual transmissions, but if you can’t have fun with an automatic, you aren’t trying hard enough. And these two both look like fun to me. Which one looks like more fun to you?

 

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ExAutoJourno
ExAutoJourno
14 seconds ago

Vitaras are kind of fun, and a major improvement over the Samurai. Not loving the autobox, but I guess we can’t have everything. Still, it will do mild off-roading well, and isn’t awful on the highway. Pretty sure I remember seeing the two-tone on a Vitara wearing its original paint. I like it.

My experience with Kei cars is that you have to wind the bejeebers out of those mouse motors to make much forward progress. The automatic doesn’t encourage that. Otherwise, the Alto is nifty.

So both are really second choices today, manual transmissions away from being as fun as they could be.

Grey alien in a beige sedan
Member
Grey alien in a beige sedan
55 seconds ago

I used to drive a Grand Vitara… so I’m going for the two-door convertible variant here.

James McHenry
Member
James McHenry
5 minutes ago

*gasp!*
Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee *inhaaaaaaale* eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeicar!

*huff*…And since both be auto…*huff*….then I be Alto.

Last edited 3 minutes ago by James McHenry
Elhigh
Elhigh
19 minutes ago

I was all over the little Alto until I saw the slushbox. Then I was entirely meh.

The Vitara fixed most of what was dreadful about the Samurai – namely, its willingness to exchange shiny for dirty sides facing up – while retaining a lot of its surprisingly capable offroadiness wrapped in a twee little Speedo-like fit. It’s got the hard top instead of the fabric fold-down; fold down roofs might be fun for some folks but never for me.

Vitara takes the cake today. Takes it waaaaaaayyyy out into the boonies.

Clark B
Member
Clark B
30 minutes ago

My grandpa had a 1990(?) Sidekick for years when I was a kid and teenager. Bought it at a yard sale for $1,000. Lots of good memories driving around his farm and the countryside with him in that thing. I even got to drive it once I got my license. It’s nothing special to drive, and I’d really prefer the Sidekick version, but for noatalgia’s sake I’m going with the Vitara.

LBJsPNS
Member
LBJsPNS
32 minutes ago

Beep Beep Hi!

The Stig's Misanthropic Cousin
Member
The Stig's Misanthropic Cousin
35 minutes ago

I voted Vitara. It would be hard to pass up an imported baby offroader for this price, even if it has the wrong number of pedals. I’m torn as to whether or not I like the hard top – it presumably reduces noise considerably and is small/light enough I could remove and install it easily without help, but it looks weird. I don’t think it would keep me from buying this Vitara, but I would try to locate a soft top.

The Alto is interesting, but it isn’t for me. I think it is weirdly proportioned from most angles and I don’t like the front or rear end styling. Also, I prefer “normal” cars – I can’t fix most car problems myself, and finding someone willing to work on this car might be challenging. Also, I’m not sure I would fit in this thing, even after losing 70 lbs. in the past year.

Last edited 34 minutes ago by The Stig's Misanthropic Cousin
Elhigh
Elhigh
17 minutes ago

Well congrats on the weight loss at least.

Assuming that was what you were going for. If it’s cancer or you had a few yards of intestine removed, then my condolences.

TK-421
TK-421
37 minutes ago

Going against the (probable) grain today and choosing Alto! It’s more expensive, still an auto, but maybe that auto would make learning RHD a bit easier? Just point and go (eventually).

Michael Fortenbery
Michael Fortenbery
27 minutes ago
Reply to  TK-421

The learning curve for RHD in a LHD place (even with a manual) is not an issue for the most part. The most difficult thing is to remember that the turn signal stalk is now on the right side of the steering column. Don’t ask how many times I’ve activated the wipers instead of the turn signals on my Sambar.

Mr. Wallace
Member
Mr. Wallace
39 minutes ago

“0 – 60? Yes.”
I think that New Beetle billboard copy from the 90’s fits both these vehicles pretty well.

Ricardo M
Member
Ricardo M
43 minutes ago

A tiny, high-revving, turbocharged engine would be a tragic thing to experience through a three-speed automatic transmission. I’ll take the Vitara, it’s cheap enough to off-road guilt-free.

Elhigh
Elhigh
16 minutes ago
Reply to  Ricardo M

Right?

“This peaky little mill needs something to carve off its rough edges.” Said no enthusiastic driver ever.

Buzz
Buzz
49 minutes ago

I’m not paying 8 large for an automatic Alto. Vitara it is.

TDI in PNW
TDI in PNW
49 minutes ago

That Alto Works is flexing a unique charm that the Vitara can’t even begin to aspire to. I’d say the Vitara is a better car to own for all the things but the irrational car person inside me chooses the little Alto.

StillNotATony
Member
StillNotATony
52 minutes ago

Vitara, all day, every day.

I had a ’95 Geo Tracker as the first new car I ever bought. I loved that little guy, and my oldest even learned to drive in it. I’d love to have another one.

16
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x