Home » Smallish Stickshift SUVs: 1996 Ford Explorer vs 1997 Toyota RAV4

Smallish Stickshift SUVs: 1996 Ford Explorer vs 1997 Toyota RAV4

Sbsd 3 24 2023
ADVERTISEMENT

Good morning! Today we’re back in the Pacific Northwest looking at a couple of manual SUVs. But before we do,  let’s see whether you like ’em plain or with everything:

Screen Shot 2023 03 22 At 6.57.30 Pm

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Yeah, that’s what I thought. That Caddy is basically a superfund site with keyless entry. The Cavalier is nothing special, but it does the job.

Now then: Need something with a little more room, but still want a stickshift? We’ve got you covered. These two SUVs are fundamentally different: One is an old-school body-on-frame 4×4, and the other is a front-wheel-drive crossover. But either one will carry five people and a bunch of stuff. How do they compare? Let’s find out.

1996 Ford Explorer – $2,900

01515 Go8fgylaqaq 0ci0t2 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

Engine/drivetrain: 4.0 liter overhead valve V6, five-speed manual, part-time 4WD

Location: Tillamook, OR

Odometer reading: 166,000 miles

Runs/drives? Sure does

The Ford Explorer, one of the best-selling vehicles of the 1990s, needs no introduction. But this one is a little different from the Eddie Bauer mommy-mobiles you might remember from the shopping mall parking lots. Here you won’t find any power windows, cruise control, eight-speaker audio system, leather seats, or any of that other bric-a-brac. This Explorer is a former government fleet vehicle, from Yreka, California.

ADVERTISEMENT

00101 Fdkvunrulg2 0t20ci 1200x900

As such, it has not only a manual, but also a plain-Jane interior, with vinyl and plastic as far as the eye can see. It has a basic AM/FM radio, which doesn’t work, and air conditioning that may or may not. It has shift-on-the-fly four wheel drive, and is currently equipped with studded tires. You’ve got about a week to change ’em out for regular tires, by the way.

01212 Edsh4sarcsj 0ci0t2 1200x900

This Explorer runs and drives well, but the seller says it just recently threw a code for a misfire. From what I remember of the Explorer my wife had for years, that’s a sign that it’s time for new plugs and wires. No maintenance records come with it, so a good thorough inspection isn’t a bad idea. The Cologne 4.0 liter V6 and Mazda-built five-speed manual used in these trucks are both stout units, but the front end ball joints will almost certainly need replacing, if they haven’t been.

01212 K30brjqahm2 0ci0t2 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

Otherwise, it’s a clean truck, with just a little rust on the roof (again, typical; ours had it too) and some holes plugged from CB antennas and whatnot. Yeah, it’s refrigerator-white, but it’s a fleet vehicle, so that kind of comes with the territory.

1997 Toyota RAV4 – $3,000

00h0h Cq0xhmrotdf 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.0 liter dual overhead cam inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD

Location: Seattle, WA

Odometer reading: 163,000 miles

ADVERTISEMENT

Runs/drives? Yep!

This is it, the one that started the whole compact crossover craze: the first-generation Toyota RAV4. Built on a unibody architecture, with a front-wheel-drive drivetrain and the engine from a Camry, the RAV4 is nothing like a typical SUV of its time. But it struck a chord with buyers, Toyota sold a ton of them, and the rest is history.

00l0l 37plbera2bd 0xs0pp 1200x900

The first-generation RAV4 was available in two-door or four-door models, with front- or four-wheel-drive. The two-doors rode on a much shorter wheelbase than four-doors like this, and could be had with a soft convertible top over the back half, similar to Suzuki’s Sidekick and Geo Tracker. But it was the four-door wagon model, like this one, that set the template for the compact crossover class.

00606 4tceefskwdq 0ci0t2 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

This RAV4 is in good shape, and has fewer miles on it than you typically see. Most of them I see for sale hover around a quarter million miles, and more often than not are automatics. A stick with only 163,000 on it is a treat. The seller says it runs and drives well, and the timing belt is about 50,000 miles old (which means it’s due again soon). It was rear-ended by a hit-and-run driver and has a banged-up rear door; there’s no word on whether the door still opens, but the only photo of the cargo area is from the inside. Not a good sign.

00v0v 4zfuulcyxdt 0ci0t2 1200x900

It does have this fun seat fabric, though, and it’s in good condition. I like how the pattern carries over into the door panels as well. Nice touch, Toyota.

Obviously, these are different vehicles that are each good at different things, but they’re similar enough that someone looking for a smallish SUV and insisting on a stick might cross-shop them. Which one moves you?

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: Craigslist sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
49 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phil Ventura
Phil Ventura
11 months ago

had an explorer, wifey now drives a 96 rav 4 4 door. 200,000 miles on the original clutch! i’m a ford guy but that rav 4 just keeps going and going. not a sporty handling car but capable. it handles snow and ice ok, it’s fwd, not the awd model. can’t find a comfy seat position for my wonkie back, but wife loves it.

Colin Hoover
Colin Hoover
1 year ago

I am contractually obliged to vote for the Toyota.

Justin Short
Justin Short
1 year ago

50/50 split right now, 😉

Ordinarily I would say toyota but that explorer, nice

Masterbuilder
Masterbuilder
1 year ago

I had a ’96 Explorer and it was a really durable vehicle.

I took it a lot of places it had no business going and it never let me down. The M5OD and 4.0 Cologne are pretty much dead nuts reliable.

The Explorer all the way.

LindaNichols
LindaNichols
1 year ago

I’m making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

That is what I do… https://c2d.in/joblive76

ShouldaboughtaHonda
ShouldaboughtaHonda
1 year ago
Reply to  LindaNichols

So, Explorer or RAV4?

Space
Space
1 year ago

At $13k a month he can buy both with enough left over to fix both.!

OrigamiSensei
OrigamiSensei
1 year ago

Fleet spec means it was probably treated pretty roughly and is really more aged than the mileage would indicate. Give me the RAV and the cool seats.

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
1 year ago

Toyota for me even with the damage to the rear hatch door that I’m sure could be banged back into the right shape to enable it to open and close again with a sledgehammer.

Kyle Brant
Kyle Brant
1 year ago

Explorer for sure, set of better rims off a sl200-2003 sport have it looking newer, plus might be bad idea to do the timing chains

Mr. Canoehead
Mr. Canoehead
1 year ago
Reply to  Kyle Brant

Definitely a bad idea if it’s the SOHC engine because it’s an engine out job.

Hotdoughnutsnow
Hotdoughnutsnow
1 year ago

I’ll take the Explorer, then I can cosplay as a government employee. There is something sort of punk rock about that.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
1 year ago

Upside: park anywhere the hell you want.
Downside: have to always carry a clipboard.

D.B. Platypus
D.B. Platypus
1 year ago

1st-gen RAV4 is a classic.

SlowCarFast
SlowCarFast
1 year ago

I’m just not in the mood for a utility-spec SUV (with no picture of the hatch) today.

49
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x