It’s hard to believe that the Audi Q7 has been around for 20 years and we’re just now seeing the third-generation model. Ten-year lifecycles are exceptionally rare these days, so if you’re designing something for the long-haul, it better be good. There’s reason to be trepidatious here, because Audi’s been in a bit of a rough patch. First-quarter sales in America were down 30 percent year-over-year, the general sales slide has been happening for years, and it’s relatively easy to see why.
After rebuilding from a late-’80s reputation hit, Audi became the go-to luxury brand not just for all-wheel-drive, but for well-assembled interiors made of lovely stuff. When the TT arrived, styling became another distinctive factor with a string of sleek, modern designs. Audi became seriously cool by the late 2000s, but in the past four years or so, appeal of the overall product line has taken a dip. The new Q5 feels like it’s made of cheaper stuff than the old one, minimization of physical controls across the board hasn’t been great, and the current phase of styling seems hit-or-miss.
On the new Q7 though, that styling is a hit. Ditching the astoundingly crisp character line down the side just works better when you have this much sheetmetal, and all the proportions of the elements just seem about right. Pinching the Hofmeister kink from BMW is a bit cheeky, but the lack of unpainted cladding is welcome and there’s an overall refinement to the SUV that looks reasonably expensive.

As this is an Audi, there’s some lighting news to go over. The new Q7 will be the marque’s first U.S.-spec model with proper matrix-style adaptive driving beams that can selectively dim the lights where oncoming cars are, and you get extra turn signals projected on the ground at night front and rear. These arrows are a fascinating concept, likely to pop a few eyes out in the wild.

While other recent Audis have been relying a bit too heavily on capacitive touch controls, the Q7 actually adds some physical knobs and buttons back in. There’s a real volume knob in the console, scroll wheels on the steering wheel for volume and such, and proper buttons for your memory seats. However, there are still some irritants of modernity at play here. The rest of the steering wheel controls do appear to be virtual, the air vents seem to be controlled through the touchscreen, that passenger screen with the chunky bezel is still of questionable utility, and the door handles are electronic. That last one’s because you can get automatic doors like on the BMW 7 Series, but still.

However, look beyond some of the more controversial technology and the cabin of the new Q7 is pure Audi. Real leathers, woods, and fabrics look expensive and clad all the right surfaces. The second-row seat features a clever 35:30:35 split for through-loading, helpful USB-C ports are dotted across all three rows of seats, and you can spec a 22-speaker Bang & Olufsen audio system. The wireless smartphone chargers feature thoughtfully raised inductive elements to not interfere with your iPhone’s camera bump, an available built-in dashcam offers peace of mind, the moonroof can be optioned to dim at the touch of a button, and the second-row seats can tip forward for third row access without attempting to compress installed child seats. That’s all rather nice stuff, exactly what people buying a big Audi SUV are looking for.

Now let’s talk about power, because this is where things get really interesting. While other markets can get a diesel, American Mk3 Q7s get a 2.9-liter twin-turbocharged V6 similar to the one in the old RS5. This means you get 429 horsepower and 442 lb.-ft. of torque as standard in this family SUV, enabling a claimed zero-to-60 mph time of 4.8 seconds. Some of the credit for that goes to the eight-speed automatic and revised all-wheel-drive system with a preloaded limited-slip center differential, but it’s the output that really shines.

If that isn’t quick enough for you, Audi will offer an SQ7 with a four-liter twin-turbocharged V8. It gets a 22 lb.-ft. boost of torque over the old SQ7, but crucially, an extra 91 horsepower. That’s 591 horsepower and 590 lb.-ft. of torque in a fairly unassuming seven-seater, and a claimed zero-to-60 mph time of just 3.7 seconds. On paper, that’s quicker than the Porsche Cayenne S and about level with the BMW X5 M60i. The SQ7 also adds an electronically-controlled limited-slip rear differential and air suspension, as you’d expect when you step to a V8 in this segment. Regardless of which engine you choose, towing capacity stands at 7,700 pounds. Enough for a reasonably sized boat or a modest camper.

Between the power, the return of some physical controls, and the relatively tasteful adaptation of Audi’s current design ethos, the new Q7 feels like three rows of hope. Fifteen years ago, Audi was on top of the world. The R8, S5, and A7 were all properly desirable cars, a factor that’s waned from the lineup in recent years. This latest Q7—seemingly laser-targeted at the U.S. market—is actually tantalizing, and that sort of intrigue is exactly what Audi needs. If models like the incoming Q9 and the next A3 follow this path, the next few Audi models could be promising indeed.
Top graphic image: Audi









Love the new front end. The side seems to be a mercedes/genesis/bently/everyone clone and I do NOT like any of those cars side views.
The interior….I can’t say I like the passenger screen just because of screen bias. I have to admit it is a really nice layout though, and I could quickly get over it, if it can go black when driving at night.
The shifter, I have to get a better look at that, is it a traditional stalk? It seems like it might be….
Overall, I expected to hate this like most modern cars, but I really like that interior, looks very comfortable and visually pleasing.
Now that I can afford an Audi… screw Audi. No button in sight. Idiotic placement of the hazard switch. As long as their interiors are screen screen screens, the brand is dead to me. And I was once a fanboy, dreaming of owning an A7 when I could not afford it.
Next time don’t tell us what it is, blur the badges and we will guess the brand.
Ford? Hyundai?
Do you know what? In pictures I don’t like Audis current styling and they are expensive and material quality has gotten a bit worse. But – and I am biased here as I do work in an Audi showroom – there is something about them when you sit in the current range, at least for me, that just feels right. Good ergos even with the haptic nonesense. I also think the styling is a grower the S5 avant in particular so long as it’s not on stupid black wheels. Lot of competition though but I am quietly optimistic.
“good ergos” in an audi? Have you been in, I dunno, a Mazda or a Volvo lately? Even a Ford/Lincoln? Y’know, vehicles designed for human use first, not by (seemingly) a randomizer given a collection of primary and secondary controls that put them “wherever”?
Everything is easy to reach, where you expect it to be and quite close. I’ve owned 20 different cars and bikes I have an idea of where I like things to be and the current range of Audis is pretty good in this regard. I just bought a CLK350 from 2006 today – this will likely have been a horrible decision especially as my 2006 C180k blew up and these apparently also have timing chain issues- and the ergos on that are horrendous (but I’ve always liked the shape and it’s quite nice to drive). I’ve had Mazdas (pretty good though NC MX-5 has a lot of compromises) Volvo and other brands too. What I am saying is despite the new interfaces when I sit in the new Q3, Q5 and A5 (and Q6 as interior is the same) everything is for me really well placed.
The all new Ford Explorer X7, by Audi!!
It looks like a glammed up Santa Fe.
The front end looks like an AI blend of every Hyundai and Kia CUV of the last 5 years. The giant rear reminds me of that ugly Nissan/Infiniti boat they’ve been selling for decades (Armada? q80? whatever).
You know it’s ass when it’s best angle(side view) looks like a Highlander.
Design snobbery will only get you so far. If the main feature of expensive cars’ design is to be different from cheaper brands, they’ll all end in beaver tooth grill territory. Chevy’s SUVs are among the best looking currently. Definitely the cleanest classic interior design. Luxury brands are running away from that, and it won’t serve them well.
This thing looks like every Hyundai from before the last 5 years (up to 2020-ish), which were designed by the same people who designed Audis and such when Audis and such were not ugly. Current HyunKia design is atrocious precisely because they are trying to outjump themselves and take themselves too seriously.
The rear is Benz-like. Which the new Highlander also looks like.
I’m not trying to be a snob here. I don’t drive luxury cars and think many of them look ridiculous, not just this one. For example, I think the Audi here is better looking than most of the current BMW SUVs I’ve seen (especially the electrics *shudder*). However, that doesn’t change that I really don’t like the Q7. The giant fish scale grill looks horrible to me, and that is only one of at least 4 plastic grill/textures on the front end. Yet, at a glance, it could be confused with any random SUV. It’s simultaneously busy and boring which is hard to pull off and I’m sure not what they were going for.
But hey, taste is subjective and no two people will ever like exactly the same thing. If you think Chevy is making the best looking SUVs, I don’t think we’re going to find much common ground, so maybe we should just agree to disagree.
Too bad it’s so ugly.
No thanks.
Are we not supposed to talk about the fact that the front end looks like a 2020 Hyundai SanteFe?
Once you see it, can’t unsee.
I don’t care where it comes from, it is better than it was imo. The side view is the real issue for me.
I genuinely hate the front end. It looks like a weird mashup of a Ford CUV and a Mitsubishi Outlander.
The rear I guess I don’t hate, it’s a lot cleaner than the front. But the taillights look like they just took the DRLs and flipped them over. And the damn full-width light bar. I do not understand the fascination with these things.
It looks OK from the side – decent proportions as you say, for what it is. Does look a lot like an XC90. But that front is hot garbage with too many disconnected elements going on, and that humungous grille with sort of blobby looking openings. Back is tidy enough but the tail lights have adopted the weird Cadillac/Lexus “droop” and again they just don’t fit in with anything else.
Good to see some positive comments. The new S5 sure went sideways – worse interior and 0-60 performance. Exterior did little for me. Sadly, that was poised to be the aspirational upgrade for me when ye olde A5 is ready for pasture. It’s perhaps more worrying that Audi can get the Q7 right-ish (at least on paper) but miss the mark hard on a smaller car that preceded it on the release schedule.
Every Q7 update after the 1st gen has looked just a bit awkward to me, and this latest generation continues that trend.
Sorry, but this is a downgrade aesthetically both inside and out. Sure, at least it doesn’t look as weirdly blobby as the Q5 on the outside, but it also doesn’t scream Q7 in any way, shape or form. Every generation of Q7 so far has had some design connection between them.
The interior is just nicer materials on current Audi garbage. Random screens with ears, capacitive touch controls. I will give them credit for removing the piano black from the centre console though.
The side view is giving GM. Rear 3/4, Mazda CX9. Good thing Audi came up with a trademark grille shape.
From the photos it looks OK. I guess. Kinda like an older Hyundai Santa Fe got funky with an X5.
That a problem because Audi used to have either the best, or close to the best, looking cars in a given segment. They used to look great. They used to stand out. Now, they don’t stand out much at all.
Not being ugly doesn’t mean it looks great.
I seriously initially thought this was a new Kia. That’s what it looks like.
Not even a NEW Kia, but rather a USED Hyundai.
Load up a pic of a 2020 Hyundai SanteFe. The more you look at the two, the more similaries you see.
Mercedes is copying gawdy Chinese designs and Audi is mimicking Korean vehicles.
And the mismatched screens set into that ovalish piece of glass? I can buy it on an entry level Q3 but for six figures, come on… The car just looks uninspired. “We designed a new one because we had to” is the vibe I get.
Have always thought the Lincoln Nautilus looks good.
If it’s not bold and in your face, how will other people know that you’ve spent the big bucks on it?
I’m sure it’s a nice car. It’s not offensive. But it also doesn’t stand out for any real reason.
I think the powertrains stand out. Two 400+ horsepower mills that are used in Audi RS and Porsche GTS products. Hell I don’t even know if I’d upgrade to the SQ7 at this point. Yeah, V8 noises are cool but I can’t imagine driving a boat that hits 60 in the mid to low 4s (the 4.8 quoted is almost certainly up a hill in the rain at elevation, as is German tradition) and being like “I simply MUST have more power”….
Audi became successful precisely because their styling wasn’t bold and in your face. They’re supposed to look quiet but with nice subtle details when you looks closer, though their recent models don’t really accomplish that.
I think this is probably the most appealing new Audi in years, for a couple of reasons.
1). They’ve finally figured out their new design language for crossovers. The current Q5 is a bulbous, anonymous egg in a sea of bulbous, anonymous eggs. They tweaked things a bit, added some more angles, and gave us a fairly attractive car in the new Q3.
But this is the first time I think it’s looked fully cohesive. The more vertical grille and traditional, boxier SUV shape just works here. It’s the first time in a while I’ve seen a new Audi that stirred any emotion in me whatsoever.
2). It’s going to be excellent dynamically. This platform (MLB Evo, I think?) also underpins the Cayenne and Urus, cars that come with much greater expectations as far as the driving experience is concerned. The general consensus with the Q7/Q8 has always been that they punch above their weight as far as handling, engagement, etc. are concerned.
3). The engine! Dear lord, Audi made a good powertrain choice for once. One of the issues with Audis compared to BMWs and even Mercedes is the engines are just blah. It was hard to choose that good but not mind blowing 3 liter turbo V6 over God’s own engine the B58. Hell Mercedes has a great straight six as well.
But now? This is the same mill as in the RS5 and Porsche GTS products, as a base engine. It’s way up on power compared to the competitors and you get some cool dad bragging rights. It won’t be as efficient as the straight 6s and it isn’t exactly known for overflowing with character, but it’s damn potent…and I assume now that it’s long since been developed and paid for it’ll trickle down into other stuff as well.
…can we get it as the new engine in the S5? Or maybe as a new S6? Pretty please? Also Audi even ditched the haptic bullshit on the steering wheel! Unfortunately the climate controls are still stuck in the screen but I think that’s just a universal hell we’re going to have to accept in luxury cars at this point. Thanks a lot, Tesla…
In conclusion: I think Audi cooked with this one and it seems like there are in fact still some folks over there that still have a modicum of sense.
I have bad news: I’m 99% sure the steering wheel is haptic. Otherwise… yeah I agree.
It’s on the PPC (so the same as A5, A6, Q5). Seems like front-engined Porsches are switching to MSB though.
I also think that this wears their current design language the best of anything so far. They always seem to nail it on the Q7. The fact that the current gen (the one I own) has been around since 2017 and still gets glowing reviews should tell you something about how these cars are engineered.
So far the comments here in this thread have said it looks like a:
Which tells you a few things
Awful lot of BMW X5 in the rear and profile. Am I wrong?
This looks like a decent redesign, unlike the tragedy of the A5 Sportback.
Audi simply love to make messy fronts with ugly grilles.. and actually continues to make them even uglier! What even is this pattern?
It’s known as Kaisegraterengrosslichgrundeschluven.
Trademarked, by the way, so don’t you go stealing it Hyundai/Kia.
This thing is surprisingly un-ugly, compared to its direct competition. Little did I know that Audi will some day look classic, simply because it didn’t jump into design insanity head over heels.
It also perfectly illustrates how screens on dashboards are not ugly per se, as long as they are integrated into a dash, with sunvisors on top of them and a classic dashboard look. They then simply become glorified gauges, which is what they are supposed to do, rather than nailing rectangular screens on top of the dash like a mad carpenter’s statement.
This is a car that actually doesn’t look bad. Rare enough to be praised.
Their reliability has been total garbage for a long time. My TT-S had the blend doors break at 30k miles. It was the only car I ever owned that had that did this.
how was the service dept? Super brutal>?
When I had my Q3 and my wife had the A3, the service dept around our way was top notch (in NW PHL we went to Audi Ft Washington). They never tried to pork you with BS stuff
I don’t think we will see many here. Also apparently, diesel only for the moment.
Must be the only passenger car currently on sale that only offers diesel engines.