Home » The U.S. Proposes Deleting Limp Mode Entirely For Running A Diesel Truck With A Broken DEF System

The U.S. Proposes Deleting Limp Mode Entirely For Running A Diesel Truck With A Broken DEF System

Def Regs Ts1

The diesel engine continues to be one of the greatest inventions in transportation. Much of the world runs on diesel, and if these engines aren’t reliable, they can cripple vital transportation systems. But they also come with an environmental toll. Today’s trucks use an assembly of emissions systems to clean up their tailpipes for cleaner air, and one of those systems is Diesel Exhaust Fluid. When your truck runs out of DEF, or the sensor fails, the computers will send the truck into a derate, or go into a full limp mode. In a reversal from past regulations, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has published a proposal to eliminate limp mode almost entirely, so truckers no longer have to worry about DEF anymore.

One of the pillars of the current presidential administration is deregulation, and one of its focuses has been on changing how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) handles diesel emissions regulations and what the Department of Justice (DOJ) does to those who violate the Clean Air Act. In prior administrations, including the first Trump Administration, those who ran shops that specialized in deleting diesel emissions systems faced potential heavy fines and prison time. If you ran your diesel vehicle out of Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF), or the emissions systems failed, your pickup truck or commercial truck would derate its engine power or enter limp mode.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

In January 2026, the government took a major step in unraveling previous policy when the Justice Department announced that it would no longer pursue criminal charges under the Clean Air Act for the alleged tampering with emissions devices. Today, we now see the true impact of the federal government’s intentions. As of publishing, the administration has fully pardoned nine diesel tuners who were convicted of tampering with emissions equipment. Indeed, it appears that the Justice Department has stopped prosecuting diesel emissions cases entirely, and instead, the government is working on vacating sentences and expunging records of those convicted under prior administrations.

Mercedes Streeter

In lockstep with the government’s reversal of enforcement action, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has been leading an effort to deregulate diesel emissions equipment. In August 2025, EPA Administrator Zeldin told manufacturers to stop forcing trucks into immediate limp modes for low DEF levels. In February 2026, the EPA said that it was seeking to hold manufacturers accountable for foisting unreliable DEF systems on consumers. The EPA then openly considered just getting rid of emissions-related limp modes entirely. In March 2026, the EPA announced that, in an effort to eliminate limp modes and power derates from emissions system failures, the EPA will no longer require Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) urea quality sensors on any equipment powered by diesel engines. Lawmakers have also been working on making emissions deletes entirely legal.

After mulling over the idea of eliminating emissions-related limp modes, the EPA is going through with an actual proposal to see it happen. If the EPA has its way, diesel trucks will no longer derate or go into limp mode after system failures.

There has been a long road to how we got here, so let’s take a look into why the government cares about diesel emissions so much.

Modern Diesel Emissions Systems Work Hard…

Dodge

The modern diesel engine is a marvel of engineering. I recently got to drive a new Mack Anthem, a Class 8 semi-tractor that, at its most powerful, houses a 13-liter Mack MP13 straight-six diesel with 515 horsepower and 1,900 lb-ft of torque under its power barn.

Pickup trucks have equally nutty power ratings. You can stroll right into your local Ford dealership today and drive out in an F-250 Super Duty with a 6.7-liter V8 diesel with 500 thoroughbreds and 1,200 pounds of twist on tap. Today’s diesel pickup trucks can pull up to 40,000 pounds, or more weight than anyone can pull with their standard driver’s license. Yet, all of these trucks do this incredible hard work without a puff of black smoke. Perhaps even more amazing is that you can take a direct sniff at the exhaust pipe and it won’t even smell like diesel.

Today’s diesels have better efficiency than the diesels of old. But the engines didn’t do it alone. They’re also festooned with an array of emissions equipment that helps keep the air cleaner. If you have not read my previous stories on this, I’ll explain the history of modern diesel emissions equipment, but keep it short:

According to Diesel Power magazine, the implementation of diesel emissions equipment was gradual. Back in the 2000s, buyers of trucks found an Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system in their engine bays. EGR systems reduce emissions by recirculating a portion of an engine’s exhaust back into the intake. Even your modern gasoline-fueled car has an EGR system. Next came the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF), which is an exhaust aftertreatment system designed to trap particulate matter before it leaves the vehicle.

As emissions requirements demanded diesels to run even cleaner, emissions equipment evolved. The Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) was an important advancement in diesel emissions reduction technology. 2010 model year heavy diesels have SCR to meet the EPA’s strict regulations. Any light-duty diesel that didn’t already use SCR phased in its use during the early 2010s.

Bluenox Pty Ltd

SCR uses an aqueous urea solution, Diesel Exhaust Fluid, or DEF, which is fired into the exhaust to convert NOx into nitrogen and water. DEF is 32.5 percent formaldehyde-free low biuret urea and 67.5 percent deionized water. The use of SCR has been reported to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by as much as around 90 percent.

Semi-tractors often have DEF tanks capable of holding more than 20 gallons of fluid. Depending on model, model year, and driving conditions, that fluid may last 3,000 miles to 5,000 miles or so before running dry. A new Ford Super Duty has a 7.5-gallon DEF tank and, depending on the use case, may go roughly 3,500 miles or so between DEF refills. Older Super Duty trucks were known for going longer between DEF fills. Towing blocky trailers reduces DEF range. Modern diesel passenger vehicles with DEF systems may travel several thousand miles before needing their tanks refilled.

A commercial truck’s DEF tank. Credit: My Little Salesman

This emissions equipment isn’t just in pickup trucks, SUVs, and semi-tractors, but passenger cars and farming implements, too. These vehicles don’t just use a single cleaning method, either. Peer under the hood and you’ll find your modern diesel hooked up to an EGR, DPF, and SCR all at the same time.

…But Can Fail Hard

FreightWaves, a logistics industry-focused publication, explains further:

Modern diesel emissions control is a stack of four interlocking systems. Exhaust gas recirculation, or EGR, routes a portion of exhaust back into the intake to lower combustion temperatures and cut nitrogen oxide formation. The diesel particulate filter, or DPF, is a ceramic honeycomb in the exhaust stream that traps soot, then periodically burns it off in a process called regeneration, which dumps extra fuel into the exhaust to hit temperatures around 1,100 degrees. Selective catalytic reduction, or SCR, injects diesel exhaust fluid, the urea and water mix every trucker knows as DEF, into the exhaust to convert nitrogen oxides into nitrogen and water. Watching over all of it is the onboard diagnostic system, the OBD, a network of sensors that monitors every component and reports faults.

The OBD isn’t just about diagnostics; it enforces compliance. Run out of DEF, or throw a sensor code the system reads as tampering or malfunction, and the engine control module begins derating the truck. First, it cuts power. Then, under the inducement strategies EPA required manufacturers to build in, it can limit the vehicle to as little as 5 mph. The industry calls it limp mode. A loaded truck limping at 5 mph on an interstate shoulder is a stranded asset, a missed delivery, and, for an owner-operator, sometimes the difference between making a truck payment and missing one.

Skoda

While these systems have been great in concept and efficient in actual operation, there has been a lingering issue of poor emissions equipment reliability. Here’s what I said last time:

These vehicles will warn their drivers about depleting reserves, with these warnings ranging from visual reminders to audible alarms. If you fail to replenish the DEF, or the DEF system isn’t working as designed, the truck may immediately derate or enter limp mode until the issue is resolved. To use Ford as an example here, the truck may warn that it will enter limp mode in a certain number of miles, and then slow the truck down to 50 mph once the mileage threshold is crossed. If the truck believes the issue is severe, it may eventually limit the engine to idle. Other trucks have a similar system.

Many diesel owners carry spare jugs of DEF so that they can refill anywhere when needed. I always buy extra DEF whenever I test diesel trucks because I don’t know if I will run into a fuel station that doesn’t have DEF, or run into a station that does have DEF, but the price of it is absurd.

DEF systems do have an aggravating quirk, and it’s that the derates and limp modes still occur even when a part of the system fails. Unfortunately, some manufacturers and models struggle with emissions equipment reliability more than others. One infamously unreliable diesel truck is the Nissan Titan XD Cummins, which you can read my story about by clicking here. The cruel twist is that you could have a full DEF tank, but get stuck during a road trip because of a sensor or other system failure.

Under the EPA’s revised rules, a semi-tractor would be able to drive 650 miles or 10 hours before a 15 percent reduction in torque. A pickup truck will enter a 45 mph limp mode 4,200 miles or 80 hours after the detection of a DEF issue. Click here to read a previous story for more about the grace period.

Cs8mt 490 Def Quality Sensor
DEF Quality Sensor. Credit: KUS Americas

According to FreightWaves, a DPF replacement on a Class 8 truck can run between $3,000 and $7,000. Depending on who you ask, a DEF sensor replacement may range from as low as $500 to over $2,500. In my experience with Volkswagen’s infamously unreliable post-Dieselgate DPF system, a dealership quote to have a VW TDI’s DPF replaced isn’t too far off from the aforementioned number. Personally, I leave my emissions systems intact and just consider their eventual replacement to be the cost of owning a weird car.

Of course, that’s just the cost to replace the failed part. It doesn’t account for the time spent stranded on the side of a highway, the cost to tow your vehicle to a repair center, lost income, or missed payments.

Yet, a kit to simply delete and forget the emissions equipment entirely often costs a fraction of replacing the equipment. At the same time, several states don’t even test diesel vehicle emissions. If you’re the end user, it can seem like there’s no real consequence to throwing the emissions equipment in the trash. You can begin to see where the economy of illegal emissions deletes came from.

The EPA Attacks DEF

Yoddha Performance

After taking the aforementioned steps to loosen the federal government’s requirements for what happens when DEF equipment is run empty or fails, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin is proposing an ultimate solution. From the EPA:

Today, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a proposal estimated to save American truckers $12 billion through commonsense revisions to unnecessary and unworkable Biden-era compliance requirements. The reimagined approach also heeds calls from American truckers and diesel operators to eliminate deratements entirely, a burdensome problem often caused by Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) system failures. If finalized, the savings could reach up to $6,000 per vehicle on new truck purchases, on top of the increased productivity operators are currently losing when deratements cause sudden speed loss on the road. Collectively, these savings will be passed on to American families through lower costs for food, household goods, and other products trucks deliver, while still maintaining strong environmental protections and ensuring clean air.

[…]

EPA is also specifically proposing to scale back the emissions warranty requirements that added the largest single cost to the trucking industry. Under the proposal, the Trump EPA would maintain the underlying emission standards, including nearly 90% of the nitrogen oxide (NOx) reductions, while sparing Americans from unnecessary warranty costs. Once again, the Trump EPA is demonstrating that environmental protection and economic prosperity do not need to be a binary choice. EPA is also proposing additional lead time before the longer regulatory useful life requirements from the 2023 rule take effect. This will allow manufacturers to ensure new technologies perform reliably under real-world conditions, rather than rushing unproven products to market.

[…]

EPA understands that sudden speed losses and shutdowns caused by DEF system failures compromise safety and productivity and are unacceptable. In August 2025, EPA issued new, clear guidance calling on engine and equipment manufacturers to revise DEF system software in existing vehicles and equipment to massively reverse deratements that were harming farmers and truckers. Today, the agency is taking a historic step to provide a commonsense solution to deratements for American operators. EPA is proposing to completely remove deratements and vehicle speed restrictions for newly manufactured highway engines and vehicles and new nonroad engines and equipment, including those used in agriculture. Instead of trucks and tractors lurching to a halt when DEF systems fail, under EPA’s proposal, operators would receive visible and/or audible alerts that allow them to continue operating until they can safely address the problem. EPA is also taking public comment on whether guidance should be developed to allow manufacturers to implement this change for in-use on road and nonroad engines and equipment. If finalized, American operators will be able to drive America forward without worry.

Peterbilt Model 579 Ultraloft Red
Peterbilt

While the EPA’s press release talks only about system failures, the actual proposed rule specifically calls out what would happen when a truck is run low or out of “DEF supply.” In the actual proposal, it says that the truck will initially give you audible warnings about low and then empty DEF. After that, it’ll just warn you every hour. Engine manufacturers have the option (but are not required) to derate for running out of DEF or for poor DEF quality if either scenario will damage the engine or aftertreatment system. As for how the derate will work, the derate would decrease the truck’s speed by 1 mph every five minutes until the specified derate speed is reached.

The proposal also rolls back tougher durability requirements that would be required for future model years. It also reverses some of the extended emissions warranty requirements that were adopted in 2023. The EPA also points out that this proposal is mostly about DEF, and otherwise leaves intact 90 percent of the NOx emissions reduction standards established under the Biden administration.

Reportedly, even though the EPA dramatically extended the time that you could drive with an empty tank of DEF or with failed equipment, operators of heavy diesel engines didn’t think it went far enough. The EPA says “individual operators and States, such as Iowa, Alaska, and Nebraska, expressed concerns with inducements, and a bill was brought to Congress regarding relief for inducements in prolonged cold weather.” According to the EPA, the Small Business Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture also have been working with the environmental department to eliminate derates entirely.

Fordmd
Ford

The EPA is also leaving the option out there for manufacturers to remove derates entirely for no DEF. It’s also requesting public comment on whether the provisions noted in the above paragraph are too restrictive or not restrictive enough. If an engine will no longer derate for an issue regarding DEF, it’s possible that some drivers will never refill their DEF tanks and just live with the nagging warnings. For some drivers, the only reason they refill their DEF tank is to prevent a derate or limp mode. So, it’ll be interesting to see where this proposal goes.

The EPA said it came to this conclusion when it evaluated studies on seatbelt usage. In those studies, drivers were most likely to put on a seatbelt when pestered by a visual and audible warning. It was found that a limp mode triggered by not wearing a seatbelt wasn’t any more effective than audible warnings.

The next step in the EPA’s plan to completely remove the requirement for derates and limp mode is a 45-day public comment period as well as a public hearing on the matter. Should the proposal become regulation, it would impact 2027 model year vehicles. So, older trucks would still derate, but new ones would not. If you want to read the legalese of the proposal, click here.

Photo: Ford

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
32 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
7 minutes ago

DEF Jam? DEFcon 3? DEF penalty?

It sounds like Trump wants to abolish the DEF Penalty

Last edited 6 minutes ago by Dogisbadob
M SV
M SV
8 minutes ago

DEF failures are so common something has to be done. Plus the whole spray and pray with urea crystals forming in all sorts of places. Alot of the euro desiels are clean enough they just run egr and dpf. Dpf are far from perfect especially with regen cycles. But if you make them easy to take out and clean maybe not such a huge problem. This is really a right to repair issue. Putting these systems into off road systems makes little sense as well. There were all sorts of loop holes like roller in class 8 truck. The systems are unreliable enough the military doesn’t run them. The newer diesels are cleaner but people don’t want to run them for reliably reasons. On top of that we really don’t know what all that urea in the air is doing or will do. You often smell it near interstates or whenever a modern diesel accelerates. Having a modern diesel designed for less emissions running egr and a dpf has to be generating less emissions then keeping something with no emissions on the road.

Shooting Brake
Member
Shooting Brake
13 minutes ago

Ha obviously we don’t need air to breath!

Last edited 13 minutes ago by Shooting Brake
Bearddevil
Member
Bearddevil
17 minutes ago

I had a Mercedes GLK250 with the 4-cyl diesel for a few years (great little car, very nice to drive), and the biggest hassle in the DEF system was getting to the filler neck that was under the floor of the cargo area. Otherwise it was an incredibly minor expense in the scheme of things.

Ferdinand
Member
Ferdinand
17 minutes ago

Not mentioning how early a typical low-fluid warning is across various models seems like a miss.

If these F350 owners are ignoring low-DEF fluid warnings for 1,000 miles, let them suffer the consequences. If it’s 50 miles, then I’m a lot more willing to support a grace period.

Unexpected failures? I also support some form of grace period. But 4,200 mile long one (even if limited to 45 mph) seems just crazy.

M SV
M SV
3 minutes ago
Reply to  Ferdinand

In my experience its not predictable. Others I’ve talked to say the same. You might look down and it says full or half then it’s down to low in just maybe hundred to few hundred miles. It’s not uncommon for the level sensor to freeze up either. That’s why everyone carries a container of def. It’s really a spray and pray system.

Last edited 1 minute ago by M SV
Gen3 Volt
Member
Gen3 Volt
20 minutes ago

Since it needs to be said even though this isn’t specifically about rolling coal?

Rolling coal should be a federal crime and provided with sentencing guidelines akin to those for attempted murder.

Jay Mcleod
Jay Mcleod
26 minutes ago

DEF is a giant headache on our school bus fleet. One example of countless was a fairly new class d unit that was in the shop for nine months waiting for a back ordered DEF sensor.

That’s absurd.

And so we pulled a 99′ class d out of storage to run those routes, lord only knows how much more pollution it emitted over that nine month span. Those old busses have zero emission gear, not even a particulate filter.

DEF parts fail continually, and they are always back ordered because they fail nation wide, all the time.

So we have to pull the new busses out of rotation because of limp modes and run the old gross polluters.

Eliminating limp mode while we wait for parts would be a win for everyone.

I don’t support letting “tuners”, aka scoff laws, remove the emissions gear on anything, gas or diesel.

AllCattleNoHat
AllCattleNoHat
22 minutes ago
Reply to  Jay Mcleod

Next time order two so there’s a spare on the shelf? And re-order whenever that gets used.

Jay Mcleod
Jay Mcleod
12 minutes ago
Reply to  AllCattleNoHat

We don’t keep parts on hand like that.

GirchyGirchy
Member
GirchyGirchy
1 minute ago
Reply to  AllCattleNoHat

Only two? For a fleet of school buses? Good luck getting that approved on a budget that’s seven figures in the hole already.

TK-421
TK-421
26 minutes ago

Cut off catalytic converters and go back to leaded gas. I’ll bet that saves some $ on new cars as (cough) well (cough).

Data
Data
17 minutes ago
Reply to  TK-421

It’s all part of making America great again, with smog so thick you can taste it.

Hazdazos
Hazdazos
30 minutes ago

While I am totally against overly burdensome regulations, but as usual this administration is proving that it doesn’t have specific goals other than to fuck shit up.

Whatever makes this country weaker, dirtier, less prepared for the future, more divided, these traitors will push for it. And about 1/3 of the country agrees with them.

AllCattleNoHat
AllCattleNoHat
36 minutes ago

I don’t know if I will run into a fuel station that doesn’t have DEF, or run into a station that does have DEF, but the price of it is absurd.”

Really? A 2.5 gallon container of SuperTech DEF at WalMart is under $10. Complaining about an occasional $10 charge every few thousand miles on what seems to be $60-$100k pickups seems absurd to everyone else.

I rarely see big rigs stranded at the side of the freeway and travel about 25,000 miles of the a year all over the west. It doesn’t seem to be a big deal. I almost NEVER see big car hauler or oil service HD trucks stranded unless for a flat tire.

This seems to be a far bigger issue for those that drive a giant diesel truck for their own amusement/enjoyment than for people actually using them for work, especially long-distance work. Maintenance and repair are costs of doing business, sure those costs get passed along but so does every other cost, I doubt it’s significant in the overall scheme of things.

AllCattleNoHat
AllCattleNoHat
24 minutes ago

Many diesel owners carry spare jugs of DEF so that they can refill anywhere when needed. I always buy extra DEF whenever I test diesel trucks because I don’t know if I will run into a fuel station that doesn’t have DEF, or run into a station that does have DEF, but the price of it is absurd.

Here’s the rest of it. I re-read it a few times and came to the same conclusion. Then though I read it slightly different and think you mean you are guarding against overpriced DEF relative to what’s commonly available so now it makes more sense (?).

AllCattleNoHat
AllCattleNoHat
19 minutes ago

Ah, makes more sense now, kind of like windshield wiper fluid. Still though even if it is jacked up at some stations it’s not really a very significant cost in the overall scheme of things, especially as compared to the cost of diesel fuel itself.

Ferdinand
Member
Ferdinand
15 minutes ago

What are we talking here, $30 instead of $10? And that lasts how long? I don’t support people getting ripped off, but how much warning are you getting for low DEF. My cheating VW gave me hundreds and hundreds of miles of warning for low DEF and it was never an issue. I never once even considered the price of DEF; probably because it was cheating and thus used so little, but even if it used 3x the amount (or cost 3x the amount) I’m not sure I would have cared.

Box Rocket
Box Rocket
44 minutes ago

Believing thatany operators will continue to use it until it fails, I’m in favor of the multi-stage limp mode with warnings currently in place.

MyMustangBestMustang
Member
MyMustangBestMustang
48 minutes ago

This whole thing is a massive headache for manufacturers. Significant resources have already been spent to meet stricter 2027 emissions regs. There’s a middle ground here and what’s being proposed here is ridiculous smh

4jim
4jim
52 minutes ago

Government by grabby ignorant old curmudgeons. The “real men breath polluted air” people will kill us all. VW should ask for its money back for Dieselgate, they would probably get it.
Rolling coal, “clean beautiful coal” will soon be mandatory.

Last edited 50 minutes ago by 4jim
Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
53 minutes ago

It sure was nice having clean air (and water, as those regs are getting axed too) for a while.

But heh, Bubba can roll coal in his Cummins with impunity going forward. ‘Murica, F’ Yeah!

AllCattleNoHat
AllCattleNoHat
44 minutes ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

I think you wrote that backwards, should be “Yeah! F ‘Murica” as that’s the net result.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
30 minutes ago
Reply to  AllCattleNoHat

I think you may be right – that IS the current Administration’s general policy.

GirchyGirchy
Member
GirchyGirchy
17 seconds ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

Calling any of that *waves hands in air* a “policy” is a stretch.

FormerTXJeepGuy
Member
FormerTXJeepGuy
56 minutes ago

4200 miles is more than enough time for a pickup owner to refill their DEF. This should be more like 500 miles.

AllCattleNoHat
AllCattleNoHat
14 minutes ago

Kind of like filling the fuel tank itself… Most people don’t seem to run out of that.

Angry Bob
Member
Angry Bob
1 hour ago

I worry whenever I hear a politician say “common sense”.

Phil
Phil
52 minutes ago
Reply to  Angry Bob

I worry whenever I hear much of anyone say it. Most seem to think the term “common sense” is interchangeable with “my uniformed and unchangeable emotional opinion”.

Lewis26
Lewis26
1 hour ago

It’s frustrating how little people give a shit about the planet and won’t care until it’s too late. Many of them are proud of being ignorant or obtuse, and decided anything “green” is DEI and woke. (See Sean Duffy calling bike lanes DEI).

Meanwhile climate change is accelerating faster and faster, weather is getting more extreme.

We are screwed as a species.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Lewis26
32
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x